BACKGROUND: Accurate evaluation of aortic root geometry is necessary in congenital aortic valve lesions in children, to guide surgical or angiographical intervention. AIM: To compare aortic annulus diameters measured by two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D- and 3D-TTE), to determine the feasibility and reproducibility of 3D imaging and assess the dynamic changes during the cardiac cycle. METHODS: Thirty children without heart disease were prospectively included. Two orthogonal aortic annulus diameters were measured offline using multiplanar reconstruction in diastole and in systole and were compared with the measurement of the aortic annulus diameter by 2D-TTE. RESULTS: Mean age was 11±3.6 years. Feasibility of 3D imaging was 100%. The coefficients of intra- and interobserver variability were 3.5% and 6%, respectively. The 2D mean diameter was significantly smaller than the 3D maximum diameter in systole (1.94 vs. 2.01mm; p=0.005). 2D and 3D measurements were well correlated (p<0.0001). The maximum and minimum diameters in 3D were significantly different both in systole and in diastole (p<0.001) underlining an aortic annulus eccentricity. The mean aortic annulus diameters were not significantly different between systole and diastole, with important individual variability during the cardiac cycle. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility and reproducibility of 3D-TTE for the assessment of the aortic annulus diameter in a normal paediatric population. Because of an underestimation of the maximum diameter by 2D-TTE and the asymmetry of the aortic annulus, 3D measurements could be important before percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty or surgical replacement.
BACKGROUND: Accurate evaluation of aortic root geometry is necessary in congenital aortic valve lesions in children, to guide surgical or angiographical intervention. AIM: To compare aortic annulus diameters measured by two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (2D- and 3D-TTE), to determine the feasibility and reproducibility of 3D imaging and assess the dynamic changes during the cardiac cycle. METHODS: Thirty children without heart disease were prospectively included. Two orthogonal aortic annulus diameters were measured offline using multiplanar reconstruction in diastole and in systole and were compared with the measurement of the aortic annulus diameter by 2D-TTE. RESULTS: Mean age was 11±3.6 years. Feasibility of 3D imaging was 100%. The coefficients of intra- and interobserver variability were 3.5% and 6%, respectively. The 2D mean diameter was significantly smaller than the 3D maximum diameter in systole (1.94 vs. 2.01mm; p=0.005). 2D and 3D measurements were well correlated (p<0.0001). The maximum and minimum diameters in 3D were significantly different both in systole and in diastole (p<0.001) underlining an aortic annulus eccentricity. The mean aortic annulus diameters were not significantly different between systole and diastole, with important individual variability during the cardiac cycle. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the feasibility and reproducibility of 3D-TTE for the assessment of the aortic annulus diameter in a normal paediatric population. Because of an underestimation of the maximum diameter by 2D-TTE and the asymmetry of the aortic annulus, 3D measurements could be important before percutaneous aortic valvuloplasty or surgical replacement.
Authors: Khaled I Naguib; Mohamed A Attia; Mohamed S Bashandy; Muhammad Saad Reihan; Tarek Ahmed Dabash; Ahmed B Abd El-Salam; Hosam H Helal; Eshak I Bahbah Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) Date: 2021-03-05 Impact factor: 1.817