Literature DB >> 24070469

Current views on the source of the autophagosome membrane.

Sharon A Tooze1.   

Abstract

Autophagy was discovered in the late 1950s when scientists using the first electron microscopes saw membrane-bound structures in cells that contained cytoplasmic organelles, including mitochondria. Pursuant to further morphological characterization it was recognized that these vesicles, now called autophagosomes, are found in all eukaryotic cells and undergo changes in morphology from a double-membraned vesicle with recognizable content, i.e. sequestered organelles, to a uniformly dense core autolysosome. Genetic screens in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the 1990s provided a molecule framework for the next era of discovery during which the interest in, and research into, autophagy has rapidly expanded into many areas of human biology and disease. A relatively small cohort of approximately 36 proteins, called Atgs (autophagy-related proteins), orchestrate the formation of the autophagosome, and these are now being studied and functionally characterized. Although the function of these proteins is being elucidated, the underlying molecular mechanisms of how autophagosomes form are still not completely understood. Recent advances have, however, provided a significant advance in both our understanding of the molecular control of the Atg proteins and the source of the membranes. A consensus view is emerging from these advances that the endoplasmic reticulum is the nucleation site for the autophagosome, and that contributions from other compartments (Golgi, endosomes and plasma membrane) are required. In the present chapter, I review the data from the pre-molecular decades, and discuss the most recent publications to give an overview of the current view of where, and how, autophagosomes form in mammalian cells.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24070469     DOI: 10.1042/bse0550029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Essays Biochem        ISSN: 0071-1365            Impact factor:   8.000


  18 in total

Review 1.  An overview of macroautophagy in yeast.

Authors:  Xin Wen; Daniel J Klionsky
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 5.469

2.  ER-plasma membrane contact sites contribute to autophagosome biogenesis by regulation of local PI3P synthesis.

Authors:  Anna Chiara Nascimbeni; Francesca Giordano; Nicolas Dupont; Daniel Grasso; Maria I Vaccaro; Patrice Codogno; Etienne Morel
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 11.598

Review 3.  Ion channels in the regulation of autophagy.

Authors:  Artem Kondratskyi; Kateryna Kondratska; Roman Skryma; Daniel J Klionsky; Natalia Prevarskaya
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2017-11-23       Impact factor: 16.016

4.  Autophagosomal membranes assemble at ER-plasma membrane contact sites.

Authors:  Anna Chiara Nascimbeni; Patrice Codogno; Etienne Morel
Journal:  Mol Cell Oncol       Date:  2017-07-25

Review 5.  Axonal autophagy: Mini-review for autophagy in the CNS.

Authors:  Andrea K H Stavoe; Erika L F Holzbaur
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Autophagy triggers CTSD (cathepsin D) maturation and localization inside cells to promote apoptosis.

Authors:  Yu-Qin Di; Xiao-Lin Han; Xin-Le Kang; Di Wang; Cai-Hua Chen; Jin-Xing Wang; Xiao-Fan Zhao
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 16.016

Review 7.  Apoptosis, autophagy and unfolded protein response pathways in Arbovirus replication and pathogenesis.

Authors:  Mahmoud Iranpour; Adel Rezaei Moghadam; Mina Yazdi; Sudharsana R Ande; Javad Alizadeh; Emilia Wiechec; Robbin Lindsay; Michael Drebot; Kevin M Coombs; Saeid Ghavami
Journal:  Expert Rev Mol Med       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 5.600

8.  PDPK1 regulates autophagosome biogenesis by binding to PIK3C3.

Authors:  Boli Hu; Yina Zhang; Tingjuan Deng; Jinyan Gu; Juan Liu; Hui Yang; Yuting Xu; Yan Yan; Fan Yang; Heng Zhang; Yulan Jin; Jiyong Zhou
Journal:  Autophagy       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 16.016

9.  Chronic Inflammation: Synergistic Interactions of Recruiting Macrophages (TAMs) and Eosinophils (Eos) with Host Mast Cells (MCs) and Tumorigenesis in CALTs. M-CSF, Suitable Biomarker for Cancer Diagnosis!

Authors:  Mahin Khatami
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2014-01-27       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 10.  Autophagy in Drosophila: from historical studies to current knowledge.

Authors:  Nitha C Mulakkal; Peter Nagy; Szabolcs Takats; Radu Tusco; Gábor Juhász; Ioannis P Nezis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-18       Impact factor: 3.411

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.