The pH-regulated M2 proton channel from the influenza A virus has a His-tetrad in its transmembrane (TM) domain that is essential for proton conduction. At neutral pH, the tetrad has been observed in two distinct configurations, the "His-box" and "dimer-of-dimers", with similar backbone structures suggesting competing models for proton conduction. Here, we propose that both conformations can play a role. In support of this hypothesis, we used molecular dynamics simulations based on density functional theory to simulate the M2-TM domain and force-field-based simulations to estimate the relevant free-energy barriers. Both configurations are stable on accessible simulation time scales, and transitions between them occur faster than the millisecond time scale of proton conduction. Moreover, the deprotonation energy is too high for spontaneous conduction, consistent with their occurrence in the low-current regime. Our computations support a multiconfiguration model with different population levels, thereby connecting experimental data obtained under different conditions.
The pH-regulated M2 proton channel from the influenza A virus has a His-tetrad in its transmembrane (TM) domain that is essential for proton conduction. At neutral pH, the tetrad has been observed in two distinct configurations, the "His-box" and "dimer-of-dimers", with similar backbone structures suggesting competing models for proton conduction. Here, we propose that both conformations can play a role. In support of this hypothesis, we used molecular dynamics simulations based on density functional theory to simulate the M2-TM domain and force-field-based simulations to estimate the relevant free-energy barriers. Both configurations are stable on accessible simulation time scales, and transitions between them occur faster than the millisecond time scale of proton conduction. Moreover, the deprotonation energy is too high for spontaneous conduction, consistent with their occurrence in the low-current regime. Our computations support a multiconfiguration model with different population levels, thereby connecting experimental data obtained under different conditions.
The diffusion of protons (H+) through water is a ubiquitous phenomenon with unique characteristics
among those involving atomic cations. Few examples exist of controlled
proton diffusion near neutral pH; one of them comes from biology,
the M2 protein of the influenza A virus, which is a tetrameric channel
embedded in the viral membrane, conducting protons from the exterior
of a viral particle via its lumen.[1,2] The conduction
is modulated by the presence of a lower pH level at the exterior;
after entering a host cell, a viral particle lowers its pH to match
the cellular level and to release its viral genetic material and trigger
replication. Therefore, significant effort has been devoted to understand
the mechanism of proton conduction through a lipid membrane by the
M2 channel.[3−5]Extensive experimental[6−14] and computational[15−21] work has been devoted to study the structure of the tetrameric M2
channel protein, especially various M2-TM constructs. Not surprisingly,
the structure of its backbone is sensitive to pH, and an allosteric
mechanism was hypothesized to model pH regulation.[8,10,20] Central to this mechanism are the histidine
amino acids, evolutionarily required for pH-regulated conduction of
protons and other cations.[22−24] When histidine is present in
the amino acid sequence of M2 at position 37 (His37), the conduction
rate is highly nonlinear with the proton concentration, suggesting
that the two mechanisms of gating and conduction are intimately connected.[22,23] To understand both mechanisms, knowledge of the structural ensemble
of the His37 tetrad is paramount.One of the first atomic-resolution
experiments specifically aimed
at the His37 tetrad measured the magnetic chemical shielding of their
nitrogen atoms by solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (SSNMR) spectroscopy,
at a temperature of 277 K and pH levels in the range between 8.5 and
5.0. The magnitude of the measured shieldings suggested a dimer-of-dimers
arrangement for the imidazole groups,[6] in
which each of the charged His37 forms a strong hydrogen bond (HB)
with an adjacent neutral His37. On the basis of this hypothesis, the
structure of the His37 tetrad was further refined by additional SSNMR
measurements on the protein backbone and by quantum mechanical calculations
(PDB entry: 2L0J).[14] In apparent contrast, a high-resolution
X-ray structure obtained at 100 K and pH 6.5 (PDB entry: 3LBW; 1.65 Å) exhibited a tightly packed His-box,[10] with the imidazoles forming HBs with adjacent
water molecules rather than with each other.[6,14]Extensive experimental work emerged to support either the dimer-of-dimers[25−27] or the His-box[4,12,28−30] configuration, suggesting that the two are mutually
exclusive. However, another possibility is that the two configurations
coexist at neutral pH but that their respective populations are finely
tuned by experimental conditions such as pH, temperature, and the
composition of the viral membrane mimic. In this work, we explore
the latter hypothesis using molecular dynamics (MD) protocols that
span multiple time scales.We first studied the stability of
the two alternative configurations,
which are putatively in the doubly protonated (+2 charge) state at
neutral pH conditions (Figure 1a and b),[6,28] by simulating these tetrameric M2-TM proteins embedded in fully
hydrated phospholipid bilayers. To accurately model the structure
of the proton-binding chemical groups, we used a quantum mechanical/molecular
mechanical (QM/MM) methodology, explicitly calculating the electronic
structure of His37, the adjacent Trp41, plus neighboring water molecules.
To do so, we made use of density functional theory (DFT) with the
Becke exchange[31] and Lee–Yang–Parr
correlation[32] functionals, including semiempirical
dispersion corrections.[33] To model the
equilibrium structure of the protein and the distribution of water
in the lumen, we embedded the high-resolution X-ray structure[10] in a hydrated lipid bilayer with the His37 and
Trp41 constrained in configuration and the rest of the system simulated
with the CHARMM and TIP3P force fields.[34−36] We equilibrated each
system for 40 ns and extracted two uncorrelated snapshots as the starting
points for subsequent QM/MM MD simulations; each of the four were
accumulated for ∼25 ps (100 ps in total).
Figure 1
Two His37 configurations
in the M2 protein at the 2+ state and
their stabilities. (a) The dimer-of-dimers configuration (PDB entry: 2L0J); (b) the His-box
configuration (PDB entry: 3LBW); (c) RMSDs of the backbone Cα atoms in the
simulations; (d) principal component of the His37 tetrad configurations
as a function of time. In both (c) and (d), two parallel simulations
of the dimer-of-dimers model are colored in red and green, and two
parallel simulations of the His-box model are in blue and pink.
Two His37 configurations
in the M2 protein at the 2+ state and
their stabilities. (a) The dimer-of-dimers configuration (PDB entry: 2L0J); (b) the His-box
configuration (PDB entry: 3LBW); (c) RMSDs of the backbone Cα atoms in the
simulations; (d) principal component of the His37 tetrad configurations
as a function of time. In both (c) and (d), two parallel simulations
of the dimer-of-dimers model are colored in red and green, and two
parallel simulations of the His-box model are in blue and pink.Within the time scale explored,
both models appear to represent
locally stable or metastable minima on the free-energy surface of
the system. The root-mean-square deviations (RMSDs) of the backbone
Cα atoms from the starting snapshot quickly saturate to a value
of 0.6 Å (Figure 1c), indicating that
the protein backbone had been fully relaxed during the 40 ns pre-equilibration
steps (Figure S1, Supporting Information). To detect possible transitions of the His37 tetrad between the
two configurations, we calculated a principal component, λ,
along the vector connecting the two configurations (see the Supporting Information): λ = 0 represents
the dimer-of-dimers configuration and λ = 1 the His-box. During
all simulations, λ-values remained within 0.1 from their initial
values (Figure 1d), showing the stability of
both configurations. We then monitored the specific structural motifs
of them.On the basis of chemical shift measurements, in the
dimer-of-dimers
model, each dimer was proposed to form a low-barrier hydrogen bond
(LBHB),[6] with the shared proton freely
moving between the donor and the acceptor.[37] Our simulations confirm the ∼2.75 Å distance between
the donor and acceptor N atoms and explicitly show multiple proton
“jumps” between the two (Figures 2 and S2, Supporting Information). Although
the proton was treated as a classical particle, a high rate of jumps
indicates a rather delocalized wave function.[38] We did not observe a strong preference for either the Nδ position
(π tautomer) or the Nε position (τ tautomer); the
relative occupancies were ∼40% and ∼60%, respectively.
This suggests that the structure of the histidine tetrad tunes the
pKa’s of the two sites to be approximately
equal, providing optimal conditions to form LBHBs. Furthermore, the
LBHBs appear explicitly to be robust structural motifs; even though
one LBHB pair temporarily broke in one of the simulations, it quickly
re-formed in ∼2 ps (Figure S2c, Supporting
Information).
Figure 2
Correlation between the HB distance and proton population
in two
independent simulations of the dimer-of-dimers model. The inset graph
shows the jump frequency of the proton within a dimer in the dimer-of-dimers
model by monitoring the hydrogen-bonding-involved Nδ−H
(red) and Nε–H (green) distances.
Correlation between the HB distance and proton population
in two
independent simulations of the dimer-of-dimers model. The inset graph
shows the jump frequency of the proton within a dimer in the dimer-of-dimers
model by monitoring the hydrogen-bonding-involved Nδ−H
(red) and Nε–H (green) distances.In the His-box configuration, despite the tight packing,
there
are no direct HBs between the four His37; instead, each forms HBs
with the adjacent clusters of water molecules,[10] and the overall His37–water HB network is well-conserved
in our simulations. The distribution of water molecules fits well
to the electron density determined in the X-ray structure (Figure
S3, Supporting Information).[10] A few HB distances changed with respect to the
X-ray structure; the two outermost waters of the “entry cluster”,
separated by ∼2.6 Å in the X-ray structure,[10] featured an average O···O distance
of ∼2.8 Å during our simulations. The Nδ1···O
distance between all four His37 and water is ∼2.8 Å in
the X-ray structure; in our simulations, one charged His37 reduced
its HB distance to ∼2.7 Å, while the remaining three increased
to 3.0–3.1 Å. HB distances with the two waters at the
Nε2 positions did not differ from the X-ray structure beyond
their observed fluctuations. However, the magnitude of such fluctuations
is larger than that of the six waters at the Nδ1 positions,
a fact consistent with the 15N–1H dipolar
couplings measured by SSNMR.[12]The
Trp41 side chains, neighboring His37, constitute a structural
motif for both configurations, as shown by the high-resolution structures[10,14] and suggested by Raman spectroscopy.[39] At pH < 6, when 3 or 4 of the His37 are thought to be charged,
a cation−π interaction has been suggested between each
charged His37 and the indole of the neighboring Trp41.[39] For the 2+ charge state studied here, such cation−π
interactions are obviously weaker due to the delocalization of charge.[10,14,21] Nevertheless, they are preserved
during our simulations; in the dimer-of-dimers, the distance and the
angle between the His37 N–H and the indole plane remain at
3.15 Å and 72°, respectively; in the His-box, the two are
3.15 Å and 45°. These cation−π interactions
may play a role in stabilizing the rotameric state of Trp41, which
is the tp rotamer (χ1 = 180°,
χ2 = −90°) in the dimer-of-dimers and
the tm rotamer (χ1 = 180°,
χ2 = 90°) in the His-box. If additional protons
bind to the His37, cation−π interactions are likely to
become prominent in both models, reaching the threshold for being
detected by Raman spectroscopy.[39]Because the presence of water through the channel is the prerequisite
for proton conduction,[40] we monitored during
all simulations the distribution of water and the size of the channel’s
pore. In both configurations, two constriction regions could be identified
along the pore (Figure 3). One region, formed
by His37 and Trp41, is responsible for gating and conduction,[22,23,41] and the other region, formed
by Val27, is at the outer end of the channel and is shown in previous
simulations to partially hinder the water flow through the channel.[4,10,17,20] While these two regions are narrow in both configurations, the dimer-of-dimers
configuration features a wider hydrophobic portion (radius = 1.6 Å)
and a narrower hydrophilic portion (0.9 Å); the His-box has,
instead, radii of 1.0 and 1.3 Å, respectively. This alternation
is reminiscent of the allosteric mechanism of proton conduction proposed
for the M2 channel,[8,10,20] where pH regulates the dynamical equilibrium between two states,
labeled “openout–closedin”
and “closedout–openin”.[42]
Figure 3
Pore size of the two configurations. (a) Averaged radius
of the
pore in the dimer-of-dimers (red line) and the His-box (blue line)
models. The pore dimension of the dimer-of-dimers model (b) and the
His-box model (c) were generated by the HOLE program. The backbone
is shown with a silver ribbon, and side chains of Val27, His37 and
Trp41 are shown in orange, yellow, and magenta, respectively, in stick
mode.
Pore size of the two configurations. (a) Averaged radius
of the
pore in the dimer-of-dimers (red line) and the His-box (blue line)
models. The pore dimension of the dimer-of-dimers model (b) and the
His-box model (c) were generated by the HOLE program. The backbone
is shown with a silver ribbon, and side chains of Val27, His37 and
Trp41 are shown in orange, yellow, and magenta, respectively, in stick
mode.Having failed to observe spontaneous
loss of protons in the previous
simulations, we then calculated explicitly, for both configurations,
the energy differences for deprotonation. To this end, we computed
the difference between the final structure of each QM/MM MD simulation
and a structure where one proton was removed from the Nε2 position
of one charged His37 and bound to the adjacent water molecule to form
hydronium (H3O+). We then optimized this structure
(Figure S4, Supporting Information) for
both configurations. The energy difference in the dimer-of-dimers
reaches ∼40 kcal/mol, which compares well with the estimated
LBHB formation energy of ∼31 kcal/mol in the gas phase;[43] no stable HBs with water are formed in the product.
In the His-box configuration, the calculated energy difference between
the two is ∼12 kcal/mol, which is high enough to prevent fast
spontaneous release of protons. The relatively high energies can be
most likely attributed to the presence of only two acceptor water
molecules; when one of them is transformed into an H3O+, the lack of a complete solvation shell destabilizes the
product. These results indicate that the proton release, bringing
the His37 tetrad from a 2+ to a 1+ charge state, is a kinetically
unfavorable event, if not thermodynamically. In the SSNMR experiment
that first proposed the dimer-of-dimers model, the second pKa constant of the His37 tetrad was estimated at 8.2, two
units higher than the third pKa of 6.3.[6] In another SSNMR experiment using a different
membrane mimic, consistent instead with the His-box model,[28] these were estimated as 6.8 and 4.9, showing
the same difference of two units. Therefore, the higher affinity of
the protein for the second proton than that for the third does not
appear to depend on the membrane environment, and the doubly protonated
M2 channel can be considered to be in its resting, nonconducting state.[6] Finally, the calculated energy differences are
further evidence of the ability by M2 to stabilize excess charge within
a lipid membrane by delocalizing among the proton-binding groups.[10,14,19,21]Having established that both the dimer-of-dimers and the His-box
are stable configurations of the system, we finally attempted to estimate
the time scale of conversion between the two. A direct computation
of a kinetic constant is currently not possible because the large
collections of states associated with the protein backbone and the
water distribution are likely to be greatly undersampled by subnanosecond,
and possibly even submicrosecond, MD simulations. This task is further
complicated by a predictably small free-energy difference between
the two configurations because both were observed experimentally under
different conditions. Therefore, we performed a simulation with enhanced
sampling to evaluate the order of magnitude of the energies involved,
using the classical CHARMM force field[34] and a metadynamics biasing potential[44] acting on the two RMSD functions of the His37 and Trp41 tetrads,
respectively. On the basis of these calculations, we estimate that
the highest energy required to transition between the dimer-of-dimers
and the His-box configurations is on the order of 10 kcal/mol (Figure 4). Due to the classical force field description
of the system, this number does not account for the LBHBs characteristic
of the dimer-of-dimers and may be overestimated. Thus, we did not
observe significant energy barriers between the two configurations;
this is consistent with a putative transition pathway composed of
individual ring flips rather than one concerted motion. On the basis
of this assumption, we predict that the time scale of conversion between
the dimer-of-dimers and the His-box is larger than or equal to the
time of a ring flip of a single His37, measured by SSNMR to be approximately
microseconds.[12] Due to the enhanced sampling
protocol, we were able to access many configurations (Figures 4 and S6, Supporting Information), which we analyzed in terms of rotameric states of the His37 tetrad.
Figure 4
2D free-energy
surface of the transformation between the dimer-of-dimers
and the His-box models. The reference positions for both RMSD variables
are the His-box configurations. Due to thermal motions, states with
zero RMSD values have very low populations.
2D free-energy
surface of the transformation between the dimer-of-dimers
and the His-box models. The reference positions for both RMSD variables
are the His-box configurations. Due to thermal motions, states with
zero RMSD values have very low populations.The distribution of the χ1 and χ2 angles of His37 is shown in Figures S5 and S6 (Supporting Information). In both the charged
and the neutral
His37, most of the values of χ1 are around 180°,
the value observed in all experimental structures.[7,8,10,11,14] The values of χ2 are more widely
distributed; in our simulation, by effect of the biasing potential,
χ2 spans reversibly all accessible values throughout
the entire 360° period. In particular, values characteristic
of the dimer-of-dimers as well as the His-box configurations are observed.
In addition, we also observed values characteristic of the low-pH
structures,[8] which are typically associated
with an expanded protein backbone; however, the latter was held restrained
during our simulations (RMSD < 1.5 Å). This suggests that
the His37 tetrad may sample both the neutral and low-pH configurations,
with minor structural changes in the protein backbone and a relatively
low free-energy cost. For example, we show in Figure S6 (Supporting Information) a “hybrid”
configuration, where two His37 form a dimer connected by a HB, while
the other two are in a His-box-like geometry. We therefore conclude
that the two configurations can experience fast exchange and that
the membrane environment ultimately dictates the precise balance between
their relative populations.In summary, we investigated the
stability of two competing models
for the His37 tetrad at neutral pH, the His-box and the dimer-of-dimers.
Both were found to be either stable or metastable within the subnanosecond
time scale by QM/MM MD simulations, and the unique characteristics
of them were well-reproduced. The release of a proton to a water molecule
in the direction of proton flow is energetically unfavorable in both
models, consistent with the low current at neutral pH conditions.
The energy cost associated with converting between the two configurations
is comparable to that of individual ring flips. On the basis of the
above data, we propose a multiconfiguration model, in which the dimer-of-dimers
and the His-box configurations are populated with different probabilities
and where they are both able to stabilize two protons within the viral
membrane. By this mechanism, the precise relationship between proton
flow and pH may be preserved against changes in the membrane environment.
This conclusion sets the grounds for a quantitative description of
the mechanism of proton conduction.
Authors: Thach V Can; Mukesh Sharma; Ivan Hung; Peter L Gor'kov; William W Brey; Timothy A Cross Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2012-05-25 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Ruibin Liang; Jessica M J Swanson; Jesper J Madsen; Mei Hong; William F DeGrado; Gregory A Voth Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jessica L Thomaston; Mercedes Alfonso-Prieto; Rahel A Woldeyes; James S Fraser; Michael L Klein; Giacomo Fiorin; William F DeGrado Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-11-02 Impact factor: 11.205