Tomas Hucl 1 , Eric Wee , Sekaran Anuradha , Rajesh Gupta , Mohan Ramchandani , Kalpala Rakesh , Ramila Shrestha , Duvvuru Nageshwar Reddy , Sundeep Lakhtakia Show Affiliations »
Abstract
Show RCT »
Hide RCT «
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Histological examination of core tissue samples may have advantages over cytology in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of a new 22G core biopsy needle . PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with a pancreatic mass lesion or peri-intestinal lymphadenopathy sequentially underwent fine needle biopsy with both a newly developed 22G core needle (the FNB needle) and a standard 22G fine needle aspiration (FNA) needle , in randomized order. RESULTS: In 144 patients, mean age 48 years (± standard deviation [SD] 14; range 18 - 82), with 145 lesions (mean lesion size 39 ± 15 mm, range 15 - 99), EUS-guided sampling was technically feasible with both needles in all patients. Mean number of passes to obtain sufficient tissue was 1.2 ± 0.5 with the core needle vs. 2.5 ± 0.9 with the standard needle (P < 0.001). FNB specimens were adequate for evaluation in 125 (86.2 %) vs. 127 (87.6 %) with FNA (P = 0.72). Among 139 patients available for follow-up, FNB provided a correct diagnosis in 110 (79.1 %) and FNA in 112 (80.6 %) (P = 0.73). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for diagnosis of malignancy were 90 %, 100 %, 100 %, 93 %, 96 % for FNB and 77 %, 100 %, 100 %, 85 %, 92 % for FNA, respectively (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: FNB with the new 22G core needle was technically feasible, efficient and comparable to FNA with a standard needle. The core needle required fewer passes to provide an adequate sample, offering potentially shorter procedure time. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
RCT Entities: Population
Interventions
Outcomes
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Histological examination of core tissue samples may have advantages over cytology in endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided sampling. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility and efficiency of a new 22G core biopsy needle. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients with a pancreatic mass lesion or peri-intestinal lymphadenopathy sequentially underwent fine needle biopsy with both a newly developed 22G core needle (the FNB needle) and a standard 22G fine needle aspiration (FNA) needle, in randomized order. RESULTS: In 144 patients , mean age 48 years (± standard deviation [SD] 14; range 18 - 82), with 145 lesions (mean lesion size 39 ± 15 mm, range 15 - 99), EUS-guided sampling was technically feasible with both needles in all patients . Mean number of passes to obtain sufficient tissue was 1.2 ± 0.5 with the core needle vs. 2.5 ± 0.9 with the standard needle (P < 0.001). FNB specimens were adequate for evaluation in 125 (86.2 %) vs. 127 (87.6 %) with FNA (P = 0.72). Among 139 patients available for follow-up, FNB provided a correct diagnosis in 110 (79.1 %) and FNA in 112 (80.6 %) (P = 0.73). Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for diagnosis of malignancy were 90 %, 100 %, 100 %, 93 %, 96 % for FNB and 77 %, 100 %, 100 %, 85 %, 92 % for FNA, respectively (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: FNB with the new 22G core needle was technically feasible, efficient and comparable to FNA with a standard needle. The core needle required fewer passes to provide an adequate sample, offering potentially shorter procedure time. © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York.
Entities: Disease
Species
Mesh： See more »
Year: 2013
PMID： 24068588 DOI： 10.1055/s-0033-1344217
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Endoscopy ISSN： 0013-726X Impact factor: 10.093