Literature DB >> 24068576

Improved spatial resolution and electrogram wave direction independence with the use of an orthogonal electrode configuration.

Nathaniel C Thompson1, Justin Stinnett-Donnelly, Nicole Habel, Bryce Benson, Jason H T Bates, Burton E Sobel, Peter S Spector.   

Abstract

To improve spatial resolution in recordings of intra-cardiac electrograms we characterized the utility of a novel configuration of two recording electrodes arranged perpendicularly to the endocardial surface. We hypothesized that this configuration denoted as orthogonal close unipolar (OCU) would combine advantages of conventional unipolar and contact bipolar (CBP) configurations. Electrical excitation was simulated in a computational model as arising from dipole current or from multi-wavelet reentry sources. Recordings were calculated for electrode tips 1 mm above the plane of the heart. Analogous recordings were obtained from swine hearts. Electrograms recorded with CBP showed strong dependence on orientation of the electrode pair with respect to the direction of spread of tissue excitation. By contrast, OCU recordings exhibited no directional dependence. OCU was significantly superior to CBP with respect to avoidance of far-field confounding of local tissue activity; the average far-field/near-field ratios for CBP and OCU were 0.09 and 0.05, respectively, for the simulated dipole current sources. In the swine hearts the ratios of ventricular to atrial signals for CBP and OCU were 0.15 ± 0.07 and 0.08 ± 0.09, respectively (p < 0.001). The difference between the actual dominant frequency in the tissue and that recorded by the electrodes was 0.44 ± 0.33 Hz for OCU, 0.58 ± 0.40 Hz for unipolar, and 0.62 ± 0.46 Hz for CBP. OCU confers improved spatial resolution compared with both unipolar and CBP electrode configurations. Unlike the case with CBP, OCU recordings are independent of excitation wave-front direction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24068576     DOI: 10.1007/s10877-013-9508-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput        ISSN: 1387-1307            Impact factor:   2.502


  14 in total

1.  Effects of electrode size and spacing on the resolution of intracardiac electrograms.

Authors:  Justin M Stinnett-Donnelly; Nathaniel Thompson; Nicole Habel; Vadim Petrov-Kondratov; Daniel D Correa de Sa; Jason H T Bates; Peter S Spector
Journal:  Coron Artery Dis       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.439

2.  Electrogram fractionation: the relationship between spatiotemporal variation of tissue excitation and electrode spatial resolution.

Authors:  Daniel D Correa de Sa; Nathaniel Thompson; Justin Stinnett-Donnelly; Pierre Znojkiewicz; Nicole Habel; Joachim G Müller; Jason H T Bates; Jeffrey S Buzas; Peter S Spector
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-10-09

3.  Emergence of complex behavior: an interactive model of cardiac excitation provides a powerful tool for understanding electric propagation.

Authors:  Peter S Spector; Nicole Habel; Burton E Sobel; Jason H T Bates
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2011-06-08

4.  A comparison of unipolar and bipolar electrograms for cardiac pacemaker sensing.

Authors:  V DeCaprio; P Hurzeler; S Furman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  A computer model of the electrogram: what causes fractionation?

Authors:  M D Lesh; J F Spear; M B Simson
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 1.438

6.  Simulation of intracardiac electrograms with a moving dipole source. Role of electrode geometry and high-pass filtering.

Authors:  E J Berbari; J Dyer; P Lander; D B Geselowitz
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 1.438

7.  The temporal variability of dominant frequency and complex fractionated atrial electrograms constrains the validity of sequential mapping in human atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Nicole Habel; Pierre Znojkiewicz; Nathaniel Thompson; Joachim G Müller; Bryan Mason; James Calame; Susan Calame; Shruti Sharma; Gagan Mirchandani; Deborah Janks; Jason Bates; Arshia Noori; Andreas Karnbach; Daniel L Lustgarten; Burton E Sobel; Peter Spector
Journal:  Heart Rhythm       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 6.343

8.  Electrophysiologic and anatomic basis for fractionated electrograms recorded from healed myocardial infarcts.

Authors:  P I Gardner; P C Ursell; J J Fenoglio; A L Wit
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  Mechanisms of wave fractionation at boundaries of high-frequency excitation in the posterior left atrium of the isolated sheep heart during atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Jérôme Kalifa; Kazuhiko Tanaka; Alexey V Zaitsev; Mark Warren; Ravi Vaidyanathan; David Auerbach; Sandeep Pandit; Karen L Vikstrom; Robert Ploutz-Snyder; Arkadzi Talkachou; Felipe Atienza; Gérard Guiraudon; José Jalife; Omer Berenfeld
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Frequency-dependent breakdown of wave propagation into fibrillatory conduction across the pectinate muscle network in the isolated sheep right atrium.

Authors:  Omer Berenfeld; Alexey V Zaitsev; Sergey F Mironov; Arkady M Pertsov; José Jalife
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2002-06-14       Impact factor: 17.367

View more
  2 in total

1.  Identification and Characterization of Sites Where Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Is Terminated by Localized Ablation.

Authors:  Junaid A B Zaman; William H Sauer; Mahmood I Alhusseini; Tina Baykaner; Ryan T Borne; Christopher A B Kowalewski; Sonia Busch; Paul C Zei; Shirley Park; Mohan N Viswanathan; Paul J Wang; Johannes Brachmann; David E Krummen; John M Miller; Wouter Jan Rappel; Sanjiv M Narayan; Nicholas S Peters
Journal:  Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol       Date:  2018-01

2.  Interpreting Activation Mapping of Atrial Fibrillation: A Hybrid Computational/Physiological Study.

Authors:  Francisco Sahli Costabal; Junaid A B Zaman; Ellen Kuhl; Sanjiv M Narayan
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 3.934

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.