Literature DB >> 24068549

Fast-track surgery improves postoperative clinical recovery and reduces postoperative insulin resistance after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Guibin Zhao1, Shouqiang Cao, Jian Cui.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study aims to investigate the influence of fast-track surgery (FTS) on insulin resistance indicators in a prospective randomized, controlled clinical trial in esophageal cancer patients.
METHODS: Between November 2009 and March 2011, 34 patients underwent the FTS pathway, and 34 patients underwent the conventional pathway after esophagectomy in our department. The times to postoperative flatus and defecation, duration of postoperative hospital stay, hospitalization expenditures, and postoperative complications were recorded. Insulin resistance indicators were measured before operation as well as on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days (PODs), including serum levels of fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting insulin (FINS), interleukin-6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP) in patients of both groups. The insulin resistance index (homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)) was calculated at each time point.
RESULTS: We found a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay and faster return of gastrointestinal function in patients who underwent FTS (P < 0.01). In addition, the total hospitalization expenditure was significantly lower in the FTS group (P < 0.01). The preoperative insulin resistance indicators showed no significant differences between the two groups. On PODs 1 and 3, the levels of log-HOMA-IR, FINS, IL-6, and CRP in the FTS group were significantly lower than those in the control group (all P < 0.05). On POD 7, the CRP level in the FTS group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: FTS promotes early recovery of gastrointestinal function and reduces stress reaction and postoperative insulin resistance after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24068549     DOI: 10.1007/s00520-013-1979-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  29 in total

1.  Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort.

Authors:  Stephen H Bailey; David A Bull; David H Harpole; Jeffrey J Rentz; Leigh A Neumayer; Theodore N Pappas; Jennifer Daley; William G Henderson; Barbara Krasnicka; Shukri F Khuri
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Clinical application of C-reactive protein for cardiovascular disease detection and prevention.

Authors:  Paul M Ridker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 3.  Insulin resistance: a marker of surgical stress.

Authors:  A Thorell; J Nygren; O Ljungqvist
Journal:  Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 4.294

4.  Elevated levels of interleukin 6 are reduced in serum and subcutaneous adipose tissue of obese women after weight loss.

Authors:  J P Bastard; C Jardel; E Bruckert; P Blondy; J Capeau; M Laville; H Vidal; B Hainque
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.958

5.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy without the use of postoperative nasogastric tube decompression.

Authors:  Ninh T Nguyen; Johnathan Slone; James Wooldridge; Brian R Smith; Kevin M Reavis; David Hoyt
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Fast track program for esophagectomy patients.

Authors:  Qin Jianjun; Li Yin; Xing Wenqun; Yan Ming; Jiang Qingfeng
Journal:  Thorac Cancer       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 3.500

7.  The association of preoperative glycemic control, intraoperative insulin sensitivity, and outcomes after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Hiroaki Sato; George Carvalho; Tamaki Sato; Ralph Lattermann; Takashi Matsukawa; Thomas Schricker
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 5.958

8.  Near-total esophagectomy: the influence of standardized multimodal management and intraoperative fluid restriction.

Authors:  Joseph M Neal; Robert T Wilcox; Hugh W Allen; Donald E Low
Journal:  Reg Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 6.288

9.  Effect of epidural analgesia on postoperative insulin resistance as evaluated by insulin clamp technique.

Authors:  I Uchida; T Asoh; C Shirasaka; H Tsuji
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 6.939

10.  Mechanisms of insulin resistance following injury.

Authors:  P R Black; D C Brooks; P Q Bessey; R R Wolfe; D W Wilmore
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  19 in total

1.  Impact of enhanced recovery program on patients with esophageal cancer in comparison with traditional care.

Authors:  Lihong Wang; Chenjing Zhu; Xuelei Ma; Kai Shen; Hongmei Li; Yuanyuan Hu; Linghong Guo; Jing Zhang; Ping Li
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 2.  Regionalization of esophagectomy: where are we now?

Authors:  James M Clark; Daniel J Boffa; Robert A Meguid; Lisa M Brown; David T Cooke
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 2.895

3.  Feasibility of Fast-Track Surgery in Elderly Patients with Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Jun Bu; Nian Li; Xiong Huang; Shan He; Jing Wen; Xiaoting Wu
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Risk-stratified clinical pathways decrease the duration of hospitalization and costs of perioperative care after pancreatectomy.

Authors:  Jason W Denbo; Morgan Bruno; Whitney Dewhurst; Michael P Kim; Ching-Wei Tzeng; Thomas A Aloia; Jose Soliz; Barbara Bryce Speer; Jeffrey E Lee; Matthew H G Katz
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2018-05-25       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Early versus the traditional start of oral intake following esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Li-Xiang Mei; Guan-Biao Liang; Lei Dai; Yong-Yong Wang; Ming-Wu Chen; Jun-Xian Mo
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-11       Impact factor: 3.359

Review 6.  Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Programs Improve Patient Outcomes and Recovery: A Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christine S M Lau; Ronald S Chamberlain
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Impact of a Fast-track Esophagectomy Protocol on Esophageal Cancer Patient Outcomes and Hospital Charges.

Authors:  Jitesh B Shewale; Arlene M Correa; Carla M Baker; Nicole Villafane-Ferriol; Wayne L Hofstetter; Victoria S Jordan; Henrik Kehlet; Katie M Lewis; Reza J Mehran; Barbara L Summers; Diane Schaub; Sonia A Wilks; Stephen G Swisher
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Enhanced recovery pathways vs standard care pathways in esophageal cancer surgery: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tania Triantafyllou; Michael T Olson; Dimitrios Theodorou; Dimitrios Schizas; Saurabh Singhal
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 4.230

9.  Is closed thoracic drainage tube necessary for minimally invasive thoracoscopic-esophagectomy?

Authors:  Lei Cai; Yan Li; Wen-Bin Wang; Man Guo; Xiao Lian; Shu-Ao Xiao; Guang-Hui Xu; Xue-Wen Yang; Li Sun; Hong-Wei Zhang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 10.  Enhanced recovery protocols for major upper gastrointestinal, liver and pancreatic surgery.

Authors:  Giles Bond-Smith; Ajay P Belgaumkar; Brian R Davidson; Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-02-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.