Literature DB >> 24066951

Tomotherapy: implications on daily workload and scheduling patients based on three years' institutional experience.

T Piotrowski1, E Czajka, B Bak, J Kazmierska, M Skorska, A Ryczkowski, M Adamczyk, A Jodda.   

Abstract

Helical tomotherapy (HT) was introduced at the Greater Poland Cancer Centre (GPCC) in April 2009. Retrospective analysis included data from the treatments performed for the first 656 patients treated with HT between May 2009 and May 2012 at the GPCC. In order to evaluate the implications on daily workload and scheduling of patients, stepwise regression and time analysis for each component of the overall treatment time, such as positioning, imaging, registration, and irradiation were performed. A detailed analysis included: (1) learning curves and optimized time needed for positioning and registration; (2) relation between irradiation time and parameters used for plan creation; and (3) average time of daily imaging. The irradiation component has the highest influence on the overall treatment time (R = 0.911). The lowest influence was observed for the imaging (R = 0.670). The learning curve for positioning was 7 months while the reduction of the average daily time needed for registration was observed even after two years. The irradiation time strongly depends on the planning parameters. Changing the pitch from 0.215 to 0.287 for pelvic cancer cases decreased the average daily beam-on time per patient by about 2 minutes. Similar changes for head and neck reduced this time by 1.3 minutes. The limitation in the usage of 1 cm field width only for complex cases, lower than 10 cm in the cranio-caudal direction, reduced the beam-on time per patient by 2 minutes. The average overall treatment time decreased from 21.5 minutes per patient in the first year of the HT usage to 13.8 minutes per patient in current practice. Our current practice shows that for a group of patients including mainly those with pelvis and head and neck cancers, the HT treatment takes approximately 15 minutes per patient allowing 40 patients to be treated within 10 hours.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24066951     DOI: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500374

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 1533-0338


  13 in total

1.  Prospective study on dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and 3DCRT for craniospinal irradiation - A single institution experience.

Authors:  Anna Bandurska-Luque; Tomasz Piotrowski; Agnieszka Skrobała; Adam Ryczkowski; Krystyna Adamska; Joanna Kaźmierska
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-01-18

2.  Safety of adjuvant intensity-modulated postoperative radiation therapy in endometrial cancer: Clinical data and dosimetric parameters according to the International Commission on Radiation Units (ICRU) 83 report.

Authors:  Abel Cordoba; Philippe Nickers; Emmanuelle Tresch; Bernard Castelain; Eric Leblanc; Fabrice Narducci; Florence Le Tinier; Anne Lesoin; Thomas Lacornerie; Eric Lartigau
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2015-07-03

3.  Performance of the eclipse monitor unit objective tool utilizing volumetric modulated arc therapy for rectal cancer.

Authors:  Alejandro Prado; Ángel Gaitán; Mario Leonor; Marta Manzano; Eduardo Cabello; Raúl Díaz; Alejandro Ferrando; Ana Milanés; Gustavo Pozo
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2019-02-25

4.  Evaluation of the target dose coverage of stereotactic body radiotherapy for lung cancer using helical tomotherapy: A dynamic phantom study.

Authors:  Masahide Saito; Hidekazu Suzuki; Naoki Sano; Kazunari Ashizawa; Kazuya Yoshizawa; Yuki Shibata; Koji Ueda; Takafumi Komiyama; Kan Marino; Shinichi Aoki; Ryo Saito; Yoshiyasu Maehata; Hiroshi Onishi
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2020-01-14

5.  Perihippocampal failure after hippocampal-avoidance whole-brain radiotherapy in cancer patients with brain metastases: Results of a retrospective analysis.

Authors:  Li-Tsun Shieh; Sung-Wei Lee; Chia-Chun Chen; Yi-Chia Ho; Yu-Wen Wang; Sheng-Yow Ho
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-04-08       Impact factor: 1.817

6.  Efficacy of the Dynamic Jaw Mode in Helical Tomotherapy With Static Ports for Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Chikao Sugie; Yoshihiko Manabe; Akihiro Hayashi; Taro Murai; Taiki Takaoka; Yukiko Hattori; Hiromitsu Iwata; Ran Takenaka; Yuta Shibamoto
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-14

7.  Light and shadows of a new technique: is photon total-skin irradiation using helical IMRT feasible, less complex and as toxic as the electrons one?

Authors:  Michela Buglione; Luigi Spiazzi; Mauro Urpis; Liliana Baushi; Rossella Avitabile; Nadia Pasinetti; Paolo Borghetti; Luca Triggiani; Sara Pedretti; Federica Saiani; Alfredo Fiume; Diana Greco; Stefano Ciccarelli; Alessia Polonini; Renzo Moretti; Stefano Maria Magrini
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 3.481

8.  Helical and Static-port Tomotherapy Using the Newly-developed Dynamic Jaws Technology for Lung Cancer.

Authors:  Yoshihiko Manabe; Yuta Shibamoto; Chikao Sugie; Akihiro Hayashi; Taro Murai; Takeshi Yanagi
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-26

9.  Feasibility of a Skin Dose Reduction for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Treated With High-Intensity-Modulated Delivery Techniques.

Authors:  Xiongfei Liao; Jie Li; Pei Wang; Xinghong Yao; Yulei Zhang; Tingqiang Tan; Lucia Clara Orlandini
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-01-01

10.  Helical tomotherapy: Comparison of Hi-ART and Radixact clinical patient treatments at the Technical University of Munich.

Authors:  K M Kraus; S Kampfer; J J Wilkens; L Schüttrumpf; S E Combs
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.