Literature DB >> 24066341

rhBMP-2/ACS grafts versus autogenous cancellous marrow grafts in large vertical defects of the maxilla: an unsponsored randomized open-label clinical trial.

Robert E Marx, Lawrence Armentano, Alberto Olavarria, Juan Samaniego.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study compared the histologic parameters and outcomes of two types of grafts in large vertical maxillary defects: a composite graft of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2/acellular collagen sponge (rhBMP-2/ACS), crushed cancellous freeze-dried allogeneic bone (CCFDAB), and platelet-rich plasma (PRP); and size-matched 100% autogenous grafts.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients each were treated with a composite graft, which contained 1.05 mg rhBMP-2/ACS per two-tooth segment together with CCFDAB and PRP, or a 100% autogenous graft prior to implant placement. Grafting material was contained within a titanium mesh crib.
RESULTS: Two grafts in each group were lost as a result of early mesh exposure and infection. Three grafts in each group developed a late exposure of the mesh that did not affect bone regeneration. The remaining 18 autogenous grafts all regenerated sufficient bone for implant restoration (100%), and 17 of 18 (97.4%) of the composite grafts regenerated sufficient bone for implant restoration. The autogenous grafts included 54% ± 10% of new viable bone but also included residual nonviable graft particles. The composite grafts contained 59% ± 12% viable new bone and no remaining nonviable bone particles. The composite grafting technique resulted in less blood loss and shorter surgical time but greater and longer-lasting edema. The costs of both grafts were nearly equal.
CONCLUSION: A composite graft of rhBMP-2/ACS-CCFDAB-PRP regenerates bone in large vertical ridge augmentations as predictably as 100% autogenous graft with less morbidity, equal cost, and more viable new bone formation without residual nonviable bone particles, but with more edema. This composite graft represents an in situ tissue engineering concept that is able to achieve results equivalent to autogenous grafts in large vertical ridge augmentations without donor bone harvesting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24066341     DOI: 10.11607/jomi.te04

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants        ISSN: 0882-2786            Impact factor:   2.804


  11 in total

Review 1.  Scientific evidence on the use of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2) in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Authors:  Pedro Henrique Silva Gomes-Ferreira; Roberta Okamoto; Sabrina Ferreira; Danila De Oliveira; Gustavo Antonio Correa Momesso; Leonardo Perez Faverani
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-05-29

2.  Osteogenic Effect of Fisetin Doping in Bioactive Glass/Poly(caprolactone) Hybrid Scaffolds.

Authors:  Henri Granel; Cédric Bossard; Anne-Margaux Collignon; Fabien Wauquier; Julie Lesieur; Gael Y Rochefort; Edouard Jallot; Jonathan Lao; Yohann Wittrant
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2022-06-21

Review 3.  Bone regeneration with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jannice de Queiroz Fernandes; Valthierre Nunes de Lima; João Paulo Bonardi; Osvaldo Magro Filho; Sormani Bento Fernandes Queiroz
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-12-16

4.  Virtual Surgical Planning, Stereolitographic Models and CAD/CAM Titanium Mesh for Three-Dimensional Reconstruction of Fibula Flap with Iliac Crest Graft and Dental Implants.

Authors:  Carlos Navarro Cuéllar; Manuel Tousidonis Rial; Raúl Antúnez-Conde; Santiago Ochandiano Caicoya; Ignacio Navarro Cuéllar; Gema Arenas de Frutos; Ángela Sada Urmeneta; María Isabel García-Hidalgo Alonso; Carlos Navarro Vila; José Ignacio Salmerón Escobar
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 4.241

5.  Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein type 2 in the reconstruction of atrophic maxilla: Case report with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  André Luiz Zétola; Thalyta Verbicaro; Sahara Littieri; Rafaela Larson; Allan Fernando Giovanini; Tatiana Miranda Deliberador
Journal:  J Indian Soc Periodontol       Date:  2014 Nov-Dec

6.  Comparative Evaluation of Bone Repair with Four Different Bone Substitutes in Critical Size Defects.

Authors:  Gustavo Grossi-Oliveira; Leonardo P Faverani; Bruno Coelho Mendes; Tárik Ocon Braga Polo; Gabriel Cury Batista Mendes; Valthierre Nunes de Lima; Paulo Domingos Ribeiro Júnior; Roberta Okamoto; Osvaldo Magro-Filho
Journal:  Int J Biomater       Date:  2020-05-23

7.  Efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma in treating patients with burn wounds: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yan-Hong Wu; Li-Ming Zhang; Yu-Zhi Wang; Jian-Wu Chen; Bin Zhang; Jian-Bing Tang; Biao Cheng
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 8.  Platelet-rich plasma in bone regeneration: engineering the delivery for improved clinical efficacy.

Authors:  Isaac A Rodriguez; Emily A Growney Kalaf; Gary L Bowlin; Scott A Sell
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  Platelet-rich plasma stimulated proliferation, migration, and attachment of cultured periodontal ligament cells.

Authors:  Kanyawat Rattanasuwan; Supanee Rassameemasmaung; Sirichai Kiattavorncharoen; Anongporn Sirikulsathean; Jarinee Thorsuwan; Wilasinee Wongsankakorn
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Oct-Dec

10.  Proteomic Classification and Identification of Proteins Related to Tissue Healing of Platelet-Rich Plasma.

Authors:  Ho Won Lee; Kyung-Ho Choi; Jung-Youn Kim; Kyung-Ok Kim; Bai Haotian; Liu Yuxuan; Kyu-Cheol Noh
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.