Literature DB >> 24065806

Episcleral venous pressure and IOP responses to central electrical stimulation in the rat.

Clemens A Strohmaier1, Herbert A Reitsamer, Jeffrey W Kiel.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Histological evidence suggests a role for the central nervous system in controlling episcleral venous pressure (EVP). Based on prior studies that identified candidate regions in the brain stem, the present study assessed the effect of electrical stimulation at the location of the superior salivatory nucleus (SSN) on EVP in rats.
METHODS: Male Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 11) were anesthetized using pentobarbital sodium (50 mg/kg intraperitoneally initially, supplemented intravenously [IV] as needed) and paralyzed with gallamine triethiodide (1 mg/kg, IV). The animals were artificially ventilated and the femoral artery and vein were cannulated for blood pressure measurement and drug administration. Carotid blood flow was measured with an ultrasound flow probe and heart rate with a cardiotachometer. IOP was measured through a cannula in the vitreous compartment and EVP was measured through a micropipette in episcleral veins using the servonull technique. After a craniotomy was performed, a unipolar stainless steel electrode was inserted into the brainstem at the coordinates of the SSN using a stereotactic instrument. Stimulations were performed at 20Hz, 9 μA, 1 ms pulse duration, and 200 pulses.
RESULTS: Stimulation at the SSN coordinates increased IOP from 10.6 ± 0.4 to 11.8 ± 0.6 mm Hg (P < 0.01) and EVP from 7.8 ± 1.3 to 10.7 ± 1.1 mm Hg (P < 0.01). Mean arterial pressure, carotid blood flow, and heart rate remained unaltered.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study indicates that the SSN may participate in regulating EVP.

Entities:  

Keywords:  IOP; episcleral venous pressure; stimulation; superior salivatory nucleus

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24065806      PMCID: PMC3805088          DOI: 10.1167/iovs.13-12781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  27 in total

1.  A MATHEMATICAL FORMULATION OF INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE AS DEPENDENT ON SECRETION, ULTRAFILTRATION, BULK OUTFLOW, AND OSMOTIC REABSORPTION OF FLUID.

Authors:  E H BARANY
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol       Date:  1963-12

2.  In vivo observations of the episcleral vasculature in the albino rabbit.

Authors:  R H Funk; J W Rohen
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  A novel method for computerized measurement of episcleral venous pressure in humans.

Authors:  Arthur J Sit; Noha S Ekdawi; Mehrdad Malihi; Jay W McLaren
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2011-04-02       Impact factor: 3.467

4.  Episcleral venous pressure: a comparison of invasive and noninvasive measurements.

Authors:  D E Gaasterland; J E Pederson
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1983-10       Impact factor: 4.799

5.  Pre- and post-ganglionic nerve fibres of the pterygopalatine ganglion and their allocation to the eyeball of rats.

Authors:  M P Ten Tusscher; J Klooster; B Baljet; F Van der Werf; G F Vrensen
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1990-05-28       Impact factor: 3.252

6.  Diurnal variation of episcleral venous pressure in healthy patients: a pilot study.

Authors:  P Blondeau; J P Tétrault; C Papamarkakis
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  A rabbit model to study orbital venous pressure, intraocular pressure, and ocular hemodynamics simultaneously.

Authors:  Herbert A Reitsamer; Jeffrey W Kiel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.799

8.  Angioarchitecture and innervation of the primate anterior episclera.

Authors:  J Michael Selbach; Johannes W Rohen; Klaus-Peter Steuhl; Elke Lütjen-Drecoll
Journal:  Curr Eye Res       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.424

9.  Aqueous humor dynamics in mice.

Authors:  Makoto Aihara; James D Lindsey; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  Topical proparacaine and episcleral venous pressure in the rabbit.

Authors:  David O Zamora; Jeffrey W Kiel
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2009-01-17       Impact factor: 4.799

View more
  9 in total

1.  Intracranial pressure modulates aqueous humour dynamics of the eye.

Authors:  Kayla R Ficarrotta; Christopher L Passaglia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2020-01-09       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Aqueous Humor Dynamics of the Brown-Norway Rat.

Authors:  Kayla R Ficarrotta; Simon A Bello; Youssef H Mohamed; Christopher L Passaglia
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  Autonomic control of the eye.

Authors:  David H McDougal; Paul D Gamlin
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 9.090

4.  [Transcorneal electrical stimulation in primary open angle glaucoma].

Authors:  T Röck; L Naycheva; G Willmann; B Wilhelm; T Peters; E Zrenner; K U Bartz-Schmidt; F Gekeler; A Schatz
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.059

5.  Episcleral Venous Pressure and the Ocular Hypotensive Effects of Topical and Intracameral Prostaglandin Analogs.

Authors:  Susan S Lee; Michael R Robinson; Robert N Weinreb
Journal:  J Glaucoma       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 6.  Vascular Aspects in Glaucoma: From Pathogenesis to Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Anna-Sophie Mursch-Edlmayr; Matthias Bolz; Clemens Strohmaier
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-04-28       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Ocular Autonomic Nervous System: An Update from Anatomy to Physiological Functions.

Authors:  Feipeng Wu; Yin Zhao; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-14

8.  Clinical factors affecting intraocular pressure change after orbital decompression surgery in thyroid-associated ophthalmopathy.

Authors:  Jae Hoon Jeong; Jeong Kyu Lee; Dong Ik Lee; Yeoun Sook Chun; Bo Youn Cho
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-18

9.  Computational Study on the Biomechanics of Pupil Block Phenomenon.

Authors:  Wenjia Wang; Hongfang Song; Zhicheng Liu
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-09-25       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.