| Literature DB >> 24064603 |
Katrin Reder-Christ1, Patrick Schmitz, Marian Bota, Ursula Gerber, Hildegard Falkenstein-Paul, Christian Fuss, Marius Enachescu, Gerd Bendas.
Abstract
Model membrane approaches have attracted much attention in biomedical sciences to investigate and simulate biological processes. The application of model membrane systems for biosensor measurements is partly restricted by the fact that the integrity of membranes critically depends on the maintenance of an aqueous surrounding, while various biosensors require a preconditioning of dry sensors. This is for example true for the well-established surface acoustic wave (SAW) biosensor SAM®5 blue. Here, a simple drying procedure of sensor-supported model membranes is introduced using the protective disaccharide trehalose. Highly reproducible model membranes were prepared by the Langmuir-Blodgett technique, transferred to SAW sensors and supplemented with a trehalose solution. Membrane rehydration after dry incorporation into the SAW device becomes immediately evident by phase changes. Reconstituted model membranes maintain their full functionality, as indicated by biotin/avidin binding experiments. Atomic force microscopy confirmed the morphological invariability of dried and rehydrated membranes. Approximating to more physiological recognition phenomena, the site-directed immobilization of the integrin VLA-4 into the reconstituted model membrane and subsequent VCAM-1 ligand binding with nanomolar affinity were illustrated. This simple drying procedure is a novel way to combine the model membrane generation by Langmuir-Blodgett technique with SAW biosensor measurements, which extends the applicability of SAM®5 blue in biomedical sciences.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24064603 PMCID: PMC3821348 DOI: 10.3390/s130912392
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sensors (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8220 Impact factor: 3.576
Figure 1.Schematic illustration of model membrane preparation by Langmuir-Blodgett transfer and potential use for sensor measurements. Model membranes can be formed by a monolayer formation at the air/water interface followed by vertically dipping the sensor through this monolayer. The surface attached bilayer requires an aqueous surrounding to maintain its integrity and functionality. Sensor incorporation can be performed either in aqueous solution (QCM) or, as aimed in this study, in a dried state protected by trehalose (SAW and QCM). Drying without protection would lead to non-ordered membranes with functional defects or lipid stacking.
Kinetic constants of avidin binding to POPC/Biotinyl-PE membranes detected by QCM. The preparation of model membranes by LB technology and handling in aqueous solution was compared with a drying step in presence of trehalose. Since the latter resulted in nearly identical affinity data, trehalose appears a promising option to protect surface attached model membranes in a functional state.
| Aqueous solution | 2.36 × 105 ±0.81 × 105 | 1.00 × 10−4 ±0.56 × 10−4 | 4.03 × 10−10 ±0.94 × 10−10 |
| Trehalose treatment | 3.19 × 105 ±0.56 × 105 | 2.25 × 10−4 ±0.37 × 10−4 | 7.24 × 10−10 ±1.86 × 10−10 |
Figure 2.Illustration of avidin binding to POPC/biotinyl-PE covered and trehalose-protected SAW-quartz crystals. Trehalose replacement and rehydration immediately occurs after the run was started (deposited in grey). Avidin injections with increasing concentrations lead to an increase in the phase shifts. Kinetic binding constants, calculated from the SAW-sensorgram, are indicated and display an affinity in the sub-nanomolar range.
Figure 3.SAW detection of the VLA-4/VCAM-1 binding affinity using a trehalose protected model membrane approach. (A) Scheme of an immobilized PL mixture (colored green) with the chelating lipid DGS-NTA to interact with the His-tagged integrin VLA-4 at the membrane surface; (B) SAW sensorgram of the reconstitution of the dried membrane and trehalose replacement (I) followed by in situ integrin immobilization (II) and interaction with increasing concentrations of VCAM-1 (III) in real time; (C) Kinetic calculations from the sensorgram lead to binding affinities in the nanomolar range.
Figure 4.Comparison of trehalose protected and unprotected DSPC model membranes by SPFM. Unprotected DSCP membranes in aqueous surrounding (A) are comparable to trehalose protected dry DSPC membranes (B) and those after rehydration (C). Inserted bars represent 2 μm.