Literature DB >> 24064068

Why size matters: differences in brain volume account for apparent sex differences in callosal anatomy: the sexual dimorphism of the corpus callosum.

Eileen Luders1, Arthur W Toga, Paul M Thompson.   

Abstract

Numerous studies have demonstrated a sexual dimorphism of the human corpus callosum. However, the question remains if sex differences in brain size, which typically is larger in men than in women, or biological sex per se account for the apparent sex differences in callosal morphology. Comparing callosal dimensions between men and women matched for overall brain size may clarify the true contribution of biological sex, as any observed group difference should indicate pure sex effects. We thus examined callosal morphology in 24 male and 24 female brains carefully matched for overall size. In addition, we selected 24 extremely large male brains and 24 extremely small female brains to explore if observed sex effects might vary depending on the degree to which male and female groups differed in brain size. Using the individual T1-weighted brain images (n=96), we delineated the corpus callosum at midline and applied a well-validated surface-based mesh-modeling approach to compare callosal thickness at 100 equidistant points between groups determined by brain size and sex. The corpus callosum was always thicker in men than in women. However, this callosal sex difference was strongly determined by the cerebral sex difference overall. That is, the larger the discrepancy in brain size between men and women, the more pronounced the sex difference in callosal thickness, with hardly any callosal differences remaining between brain-size matched men and women. Altogether, these findings suggest that individual differences in brain size account for apparent sex differences in the anatomy of the corpus callosum.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain; Corpus callosum; Gender; MRI; Sex

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24064068      PMCID: PMC3867125          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  33 in total

1.  Callosal morphology in Williams syndrome: a new evaluation of shape and thickness.

Authors:  Eileen Luders; Margherita Di Paola; Francesco Tomaiuolo; Paul M Thompson; Arthur W Toga; Stefano Vicari; Michael Petrides; Carlo Caltagirone
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2007-02-12       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  Three-dimensional statistical analysis of sulcal variability in the human brain.

Authors:  P M Thompson; C Schwartz; R T Lin; A A Khan; A W Toga
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

3.  Inverse relationship between brain size and callosal connectivity.

Authors:  H Steinmetz; J F Staiger; S G Schlaug; Y Huang; L Jäncke
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  1996-05

4.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation.

Authors:  R P Woods; S T Grafton; C J Holmes; S R Cherry; J C Mazziotta
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1998 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

5.  High-resolution random mesh algorithms for creating a probabilistic 3D surface atlas of the human brain.

Authors:  P M Thompson; C Schwartz; A W Toga
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Development of the human corpus callosum during childhood and adolescence: a longitudinal MRI study.

Authors:  J N Giedd; J Blumenthal; N O Jeffries; J C Rajapakse; A C Vaituzis; H Liu; Y C Berry; M Tobin; J Nelson; F X Castellanos
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.067

7.  Gender effects on callosal thickness in scaled and unscaled space.

Authors:  Eileen Luders; Katherine L Narr; Eran Zaidel; Paul M Thompson; Arthur W Toga
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2006-07-31       Impact factor: 1.837

8.  Parasagittal asymmetries of the corpus callosum.

Authors:  E Luders; K L Narr; E Zaidel; P M Thompson; L Jancke; A W Toga
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-05-18       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  Sex differences in the human corpus callosum: myth or reality?

Authors:  K M Bishop; D Wahlsten
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 8.989

10.  Morphometry of the corpus callosum in Chinese children: relationship with gender and academic performance.

Authors:  Wing Hung Alex Ng; Yu Lung Chan; Kit Sum Agnes Au; Ka Wai David Yeung; Ting Fai Kwan; Cho Yee To
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2004-10-15
View more
  33 in total

1.  Functional organization of human subgenual cortical areas: Relationship between architectonical segregation and connectional heterogeneity.

Authors:  Nicola Palomero-Gallagher; Simon B Eickhoff; Felix Hoffstaedter; Axel Schleicher; Hartmut Mohlberg; Brent A Vogt; Katrin Amunts; Karl Zilles
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Psychoradiologic abnormalities of white matter in patients with bipolar disorder: diffusion tensor imaging studies using tract-based spatial statistics

Authors:  Cheng Yang; Lei Li; Xinyu Hu; Qiang Luo; Weihong Kuang; Su Lui; Xiaoqi Huang; Jing Dai; Manxi He; Graham J. Kemp; John A Sweeney; Qiyong Gong
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 6.186

3.  Differences in cognitive ability and apparent sex differences in corpus callosum size.

Authors:  Sharlene D Newman
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-07-25

4.  Beyond a Binary Classification of Sex: An Examination of Brain Sex Differentiation, Psychopathology, and Genotype.

Authors:  Owen R Phillips; Alexander K Onopa; Vivian Hsu; Hanna Maria Ollila; Ryan Patrick Hillary; Joachim Hallmayer; Ian H Gotlib; Jonathan Taylor; Lester Mackey; Manpreet K Singh
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 8.829

5.  Brain size, sex, and the aging brain.

Authors:  Lutz Jäncke; Susan Mérillat; Franziskus Liem; Jürgen Hänggi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 5.038

6.  Sex differences associated with corpus callosum development in human infants: A longitudinal multimodal imaging study.

Authors:  Astrid Schmied; Takahiro Soda; Guido Gerig; Martin Styner; Meghan R Swanson; Jed T Elison; Mark D Shen; Robert C McKinstry; John R Pruett; Kelly N Botteron; Annette M Estes; Stephen R Dager; Heather C Hazlett; Robert T Schultz; Joseph Piven; Jason J Wolff
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Investigating the differential contributions of sex and brain size to gray matter asymmetry.

Authors:  Florian Kurth; Paul M Thompson; Eileen Luders
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.027

8.  Age and sex effects on corpus callosum morphology across the lifespan.

Authors:  Daniel M Prendergast; Babak Ardekani; Toshikazu Ikuta; Majnu John; Bart Peters; Pamela DeRosse; Robin Wellington; Anil K Malhotra; Philip R Szeszko
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-04-02       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  Structural and functional correlates of epileptogenesis - does gender matter?

Authors:  Ivanka Savic; Jerome Engel
Journal:  Neurobiol Dis       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.996

10.  Mapping connectivity in the developing brain.

Authors:  Emily L Dennis; Paul M Thompson
Journal:  Int J Dev Neurosci       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 2.457

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.