Literature DB >> 24062833

Iron-catalyzed decarboxylative alkenylation of cycloalkanes with arylvinyl carboxylic acids via a radical process.

Jiancan Zhao1, Hong Fang, Jianlin Han, Yi Pan.   

Abstract

A Fe(acac)3-catalyzed decarboxylative coupling of 2-(aryl)vinyl carboxylic acids with cycloalkanes was developed by using DTBP as an oxidant through a radical process. This reaction tolerates a wide range of substrates, and products are obtained in good to excellent yields (71-95%). The reaction also shows excellent stereoselectivity, and only trans-isomers are obtained.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fe(acac)3; alkenylation; cycloalkanes; decarboxylative; free radical; sp3 C–H bonds

Year:  2013        PMID: 24062833      PMCID: PMC3778410          DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.9.197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem        ISSN: 1860-5397            Impact factor:   2.883


Introduction

Direct C–H functionalization has become one of the most useful and attractive tools in organic chemistry because it can construct carboncarbon or carbon–heteroatom bonds in a highly atom economical manner [1-8]. Among all these C–H functionalization methods, the direct C(sp3)–H functionalization attracts particular attention due to its low reactivity and challenging activation [9-11]. In previous studies, numerous transition-metal-catalyzed processes, such as Pd [12-18], Cu [19-23], Ru [24-27], Rh [28-31], Co [32-34], Au [35-36], Ir [37-39], Fe [40-43] and other metals [44-47], have been developed for sp3 C–H activation reactions. Additionally, metal-free methodologies, which use TBHP, PhI(OAc)2, TBAI, I2 or Lewis/Brønsted acids, have also been employed for cross-dehydrogenative coupling reactions [48-57]. Owing to the general low reactivity of cycloalkane C(sp3)–H bonds, the direct alkenylation of cycloalkanes with high selectivity and stereospecificity remains a great challenge and attracted a lot of attention in the past years. In 1996, the Fuchs group described the alkenylation of cyclohexane by a radical reaction with vinyl triflone [58]. In 2003, the Yao group reported that styryl cycloalkanes were prepared based on a radical substitution of cyclohydrocarbon units to (E)-β-nitrostyrenes by using the radical initiator benzoyl peroxide [59]. Recently, the Liu group developed a copper-catalyzed decarboxylative coupling of vinylic carboxylic acids with simple alcohols and ethers in high yields. Cycloalkanes were also investigated in this catalytic system, though only moderate yields were obtained [60]. Several other groups have also found that Pd, Ag or Cu could catalyze the decarboxylative coupling of various aromatic, alkenyl, and alkynyl carboxylic acids [61-68]. Our group was surprised to find that low-cost Fe(acac)3 could catalyze the direct alkenylation of cyclohexane sp3 C–H bonds by decarboxylative couplings with high efficiency.

Results and Discussion

We initiated our investigation by reacting cinnamic acid (1a, 0.3 mmol) with cyclohexane (2a, 2 mL) in the presence of iron(II) chloride tetrahydrate (20 mol %) and 2.0 equiv of di-tert-butyl peroxide (DTBP) as the oxidant at 120 °C under nitrogen, which provided the expected (E)-(2-cyclohexylvinyl)benzene (3a), but in a moderate 54% yield (Table 1, entry 1). The use of aqueous TBHP as oxidant instead of DTBP reduced the yield to only 38% (Table 1, entry 2). With the help of 1,10-phenanthroline (30 mol %) as the ligand, the yield could be slightly improved to 68% (Table 1, entry 3). Iron(III) acetylacetonate provided a superior yield (91%) compared to the other Fe salts such as FeCl3, ferrocene, Fe2O3 and Fe3O4 tested (Table 1, entries 4–8). Application of other oxidants such as K2S2O8, H2O2 (30% aqueous solution) or TBPB did not afford any improvements (Table 1, entries 9–11). A decreased loading of Fe(acac)3 to 10 mol % or an increased amount of DTBP to 5.0 equiv and a lower temperature (110 °C), decreased the yield to 63%, 69% and 79%, respectively (Table 1, entries 12–14). The reaction did not proceed without the iron catalyst or DTBP (Table 1, entries 15 and 16).
Table 1

Optimization of typical reaction conditions.a


Entrycat. (mol %)oxidantyield (%)b

1FeCl2·4H2O (20)DTBP54
2FeCl2·4H2O (20)TBHP38
3FeCl2·4H2O (20)DTBP68c
4FeCl3 (20)DTBPTrace
5Ferrocene (20)DTBP74
6Fe2O3 (20)DTBP78
7Fe3O4 (20)DTBP80
8Fe(acac)3 (20)DTBP91
9Fe(acac)3 (20)K2S2O8N.D.
10Fe(acac)3 (20)H2O2d21
11Fe(acac)3 (20)TBPB49
12Fe(acac)3 (10)DTBPe63
13fFe(acac)3 (20)DTBP69
14Fe(acac)3 (20)gDTBP79
15Fe(acac)3 (20)N.D.
16DTBPN.D.

aCatalytic conditions: cinnamic acid (0.3 mmol), cyclohexane (2 mL), iron catalyst (20 mol %), oxidant (2.0 equiv), 120 °C, 24 h, N2. bIsolated yields based on cinnamic acid. cUsing 1,10-phenanthroline (30 mol %) as the ligand. d30% aqueous solution. e5 equiv. f12 h. g110 °C.

Optimization of typical reaction conditions.a aCatalytic conditions: cinnamic acid (0.3 mmol), cyclohexane (2 mL), iron catalyst (20 mol %), oxidant (2.0 equiv), 120 °C, 24 h, N2. bIsolated yields based on cinnamic acid. cUsing 1,10-phenanthroline (30 mol %) as the ligand. d30% aqueous solution. e5 equiv. f12 h. g110 °C. We then examined the substrate scope and limitation of the procedure by reacting cyclohexane with a variety of substituted cinnamic acid derivatives under the optimized conditions (Table 1, entry 8). As shown in Scheme 1, almost all of the tested substrates worked well in this reaction. Several substituents on the aromatic ring were tolerated and the position of these substituents showed almost no effect on the chemical yield. We also observed that electron-donating substituents, such as methyl or methoxy groups at any position of the ring, efficiently took part in the reaction with a slightly decreased yield in case of ortho-substituted products (Scheme 1, 3b–g). Furthermore, a reaction of 2,6-disubstituted cinnamic acid 1m lead to the expected product 3m, which was obtained in a lower yield due to steric hindrance. In addition, heteroaryl-substituted acrylic acids can also be efficiently converted under these conditions. This was shown by the reaction of 3-(thiophen-2-yl)acrylic acid (1p) with cyclohexane furnishing the product 3p in 89% yield. In general, the stereoselectivity of this reaction was excellent and only trans-isomers were obtained in all cases.
Scheme 1

Fe(acac)3-catalyzed alkenylation of cyclohexane. Catalytic conditions: cinnamic acid (1) (0.3 mmol), cyclohexane (2 mL), Fe(acac)3 (20 mol %), DTBP (2.0 equiv), 120 °C, 24 h, N2. Yields are isolated yields based on cinnamic acid.

Fe(acac)3-catalyzed alkenylation of cyclohexane. Catalytic conditions: cinnamic acid (1) (0.3 mmol), cyclohexane (2 mL), Fe(acac)3 (20 mol %), DTBP (2.0 equiv), 120 °C, 24 h, N2. Yields are isolated yields based on cinnamic acid. Next, other cycloalkanes, including cyclopentane, cycloheptane and cyclooctane, were reacted with different cinnamic acids 1, giving products 4a–f in 83–95% chemical yield (Scheme 2). As already shown for cyclohexane as a substrate, the reaction of other cycloalkanes performs equally well with a variety of cinammic acid derivatives under these conditions. It is noteworthy, that the decarboxylative cross-coupling with cyclooctane showed a higher efficiency than with smaller cycloalkanes.
Scheme 2

Fe(acac)3-catalyzed alkenylation of cyclopentan, cycloheptane and cyclooctane. Catalytic conditions: cinnamic acid (1) (0.3 mmol), cycloalkanes (2.0 mL), Fe(acac)3 (20 mol %), DTBP (2 equiv), 120 °C, 24 h, N2. Yields are isolated yields based on cinnamic acid.

Fe(acac)3-catalyzed alkenylation of cyclopentan, cycloheptane and cyclooctane. Catalytic conditions: cinnamic acid (1) (0.3 mmol), cycloalkanes (2.0 mL), Fe(acac)3 (20 mol %), DTBP (2 equiv), 120 °C, 24 h, N2. Yields are isolated yields based on cinnamic acid. Finally two control experiments were carried out to shed light on the reaction mechanism. Addition of the radical scavenger 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine N-oxide (TEMPO) or azobisisobutyronitrile (AIBN) completely inhibited the reaction, and almost no desired product was obtained. Based on these results and literature reports [69-70], a plausible mechanism for the radical oxidative coupling is illustrated in Scheme 3. At the beginning, Fe-catalyzed cleavage of DTBP by Fe(III) in the presence of cinnamic acid, gives tert-butoxy radical A, intermediate B and one acac. Next, a cyclohexane radical C is generated by the reaction between tert-butoxy radical A and cyclohexane. Subsequently, addition of cyclohexane radical C to the α-position of the double bond in B gives intermediate D. Finally, the radical intermediate D is oxidatively decarboxylated by Fe(III) to give product 3, Fe(II) and carbon dioxide. The Fe(III) catalyst is then reformed via DTBP oxidation [71].
Scheme 3

A plausible pathway for the reaction.

A plausible pathway for the reaction.

Conclusion

In conclusion, an efficient procedure for the Fe(acac)3-catalyzed direct alkenylation of sp3 C–H bonds of cycloalkanes with DTBP as an oxidant has been reported. This method provides a useful strategy for the stereospecific synthesis of substituted E-alkenes. Various cinnamic acids and cycloalkanes are well-tolerated in this catalytic system with good to excellent chemical yields. The mechanism of this reaction has also been studied, and a radical mechanism was proposed. Further studies on the alkenylation of other sp3 C–H substrates are currently investigated in our laboratory.

Experimental

General procedure for the iron-catalyzed decarboxylative alkenylation of cycloalkanes: To a Schlenk tube equipped with a magnetic stir bar were added Fe(acac)3 (21.2 mg, 0.06 mmol) and cinnamic acid (0.3 mmol) under a nitrogen atmosphere. Cycloalkane (2.0 mL, 15–25 mmol) and DTBP (di-tert-butyl peroxide, 0.6 mmol, 113 μL) were added under a nitrogen atmosphere and the resulting reaction mixture was stirred at 120 °C for 24 h. After cooling to room temperature and removal of volatiles, the products were isolated by flash column chromatography (PE). Experimental details and spectral data.
  63 in total

1.  Ir(I)-catalyzed enantioselective secondary sp3 C-H bond activation of 2-(alkylamino)pyridines with alkenes.

Authors:  Shiguang Pan; Kohei Endo; Takanori Shibata
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 6.005

2.  C-H bond activation and organometallic intermediates on isolated metal centers on oxide surfaces.

Authors:  Christophe Copéret
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Bu4NI-catalyzed C-O bond formation by using a cross-dehydrogenative coupling (CDC) reaction.

Authors:  Long Chen; Erbo Shi; Zhaojun Liu; Shulin Chen; Wei Wei; Hong Li; Kai Xu; Xiaobing Wan
Journal:  Chemistry       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 5.236

4.  Iron-catalyzed C-C bond formation at alpha-position of aliphatic amines via C-H bond activation through 1,5-hydrogen transfer.

Authors:  Naohiko Yoshikai; Adam Mieczkowski; Arimasa Matsumoto; Laurean Ilies; Eiichi Nakamura
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 15.419

5.  Ru(3)(CO)(12)-catalyzed coupling reaction of sp(3) C-H bonds adjacent to a nitrogen atom in alkylamines with alkenes.

Authors:  N Chatani; T Asaumi; S Yorimitsu; T Ikeda; F Kakiuchi; S Murai
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-11-07       Impact factor: 15.419

6.  Pyrrole synthesis via allylic sp3 C-H activation of enamines followed by intermolecular coupling with unactivated alkynes.

Authors:  Souvik Rakshit; Frederic W Patureau; Frank Glorius
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Iridium-catalyzed alkylation of methylquinolines with alcohols.

Authors:  Yasushi Obora; Shinji Ogawa; Nobuyuki Yamamoto
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 4.354

8.  Intramolecular Pd(0)-catalyzed reactions of (2-iodoanilino)-aldehydes: a joint experimental-computational study.

Authors:  Daniel Solé; Francesco Mariani; Israel Fernández; Miguel A Sierra
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 4.354

9.  C-H bond functionalization via hydride transfer: direct coupling of unactivated alkynes and sp(3) C-H bonds catalyzed by platinum tetraiodide.

Authors:  Paul A Vadola; Dalibor Sames
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2009-11-18       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Ligand-enabled methylene C(sp3)-H bond activation with a Pd(II) catalyst.

Authors:  Masayuki Wasa; Kelvin S L Chan; Xing-Guo Zhang; Jian He; Masanori Miura; Jin-Quan Yu
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 15.419

View more
  5 in total

1.  Nickel-Catalyzed Decarboxylative Arylation of Azoles with Perfluoro- and Nitrobenzoates.

Authors:  Jennifer M Crawford; Kyle E Shelton; Emily K Reeves; Bryce K Sadarananda; Dipannita Kalyani
Journal:  Org Chem Front       Date:  2015-05-12       Impact factor: 5.281

2.  Metal-Free Preparation of Cycloalkyl Aryl Sulfides via Di-tert-butyl Peroxide-Promoted Oxidative C(sp3)[BOND]H Bond Thiolation of Cycloalkanes.

Authors:  Jincan Zhao; Hong Fang; Jianlin Han; Yi Pan; Guigen Li
Journal:  Adv Synth Catal       Date:  2014-08-10       Impact factor: 5.837

3.  Dealkenylative Alkenylation: Formal σ-Bond Metathesis of Olefins.

Authors:  Manisha Swain; Gusein Sadykhov; Ruoxi Wang; Ohyun Kwon
Journal:  Angew Chem Int Ed Engl       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 15.336

4.  Nickel-catalyzed decarboxylative cross-coupling of perfluorobenzoates with aryl halides and sulfonates.

Authors:  Logan W Sardzinski; William C Wertjes; Abigail M Schnaith; Dipannita Kalyani
Journal:  Org Lett       Date:  2015-02-20       Impact factor: 6.005

5.  Cascade alkylarylation of substituted N-allylbenzamides for the construction of dihydroisoquinolin-1(2H)-ones and isoquinoline-1,3(2H,4H)-diones.

Authors:  Ping Qian; Bingnan Du; Wei Jiao; Haibo Mei; Jianlin Han; Yi Pan
Journal:  Beilstein J Org Chem       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 2.883

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.