| Literature DB >> 24062824 |
Annamaria Sinisi1, Barbara Calcinai, Carlo Cerrano, Henny A Dien, Angela Zampella, Claudio D'Amore, Barbara Renga, Stefano Fiorucci, Orazio Taglialatela-Scafati.
Abstract
Chemical analysis of the organic extract of Theonella swinhoei yielded two new tridecadepsipeptides of the theonellapeptolide family, namely sulfinyltheonellapeptolide, characterized by a methylsulfinylacetyl group at the N-terminus, and theonellapeptolide If, the first member of this class of compounds to show four valine residues. The structures of the compounds, isolated along with the known theonellapeptolide Id, were determined by extensive 2D NMR and MS/MS analyses followed by application of Marfey's method. The isolated peptides exhibited moderate antiproliferative activity against HepG2 cells, a hepatic carcinoma cell line.Entities:
Keywords: 2D NMR; antiproliferative activity; cyclic peptides; marine metabolites; theonellapeptolides
Year: 2013 PMID: 24062824 PMCID: PMC3778368 DOI: 10.3762/bjoc.9.188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Beilstein J Org Chem ISSN: 1860-5397 Impact factor: 2.883
Figure 1Structure of the known compound theonellapeptolide Id (1).
Figure 2Structures of sulfinyltheonellapeptolide (2) and theonellapeptolide If (3).
1H (500 MHz) and 13C (125 MHz) NMR data of sulfinyltheonellapeptolide in CD3OD (2).
| AA | Position | δH, m, | δC | AA | Position | δH, m, | δC |
| L-Thr | 1 | – | 171.2 | β-Ala | 33 | – | 173.2 |
| 2 | 4.36, m | 58.5 | 34/34’ | 2.29, m; 2.59, m | 36.5 | ||
| 3 | 5.19, m | 70.6 | 35/35’ | 3.10, m; 4.23, m | 36.8 | ||
| 4 | 1.11, d, 6.5 | 19.1 | L-Me-Ile | 36 | – | 172.5 | |
| D-Me-Ile | 5 | – | 173.4 | 37 | 3.14, m | 71.2 | |
| 6 | 5.06, m | 62.5 | 38 | 2.48, m | 36.5 | ||
| 7 | 2.14a | 34.2 | 39/39’ | 1.04, m; 1.92a | 30.2 | ||
| 8 | 0.78, d, 7.2 | 11.5 | 40 | 1.00a | 13.2 | ||
| 9/9’ | 1.10, m; 1.38, m | 26.5 | 41 | 0.81, d, 6.4 | 15.3 | ||
| 10 | 0.98, t, 7.6 | 17.0 | 37-NMe | 3.35, s | 39.9 | ||
| 6-NMe | 3.22, s | 32.0 | D-Leu | 42 | – | 176.2 | |
| D-Leu | 11 | – | 177.0 | 43 | 5.06, m | 50.6 | |
| 12 | 5.03, m | 50.5 | 44 | 1.72a; 1.25a | 41.2 | ||
| 13/13’ | 1.74a, 1.25a | 40.4 | 45 | 1.80a | 26.6 | ||
| 14 | 1.81a | 26.3 | 46 | 1.03a | 21.0 | ||
| 15 | 0.89a | 11.1 | 47 | 1.04a | 25.0 | ||
| 16 | 0.94 d, 7.3 | 17.2 | β-Ala | 48 | – | 175.0 | |
| β-Ala | 17 | – | 174.3 | 49/49’ | 2.28, m; 2.36, m | 39.1 | |
| 18/18’ | 2.23, m 2.29 m | 39.5 | 50/50’ | 3.14, m; 3.81, m | 37.7 | ||
| 19/19’ | 3.24, m 3.69, m | 38.2 | D-Me-Leu | 51 | – | 175.2 | |
| L-Me-Ala | 20 | – | 172.5 | 52 | 5.24, m | 57.5 | |
| 21 | 5.17a | 58.5 | 53/53’ | 1.41a; 2.03 m | 39.5 | ||
| 22 | 1.45, d, 7.1 | 16.0 | 54 | 1.52a | 27.1 | ||
| 21-NMe | 2.77 s | 30.5 | 55 | 0.83, d, 6.7 | 22.1 | ||
| L-Me-Val | 23 | – | 173.0 | 56 | 0.95a | 24.3 | |
| 24 | 5.02a | 59.4 | 52-NMe | 3.30 s | 33.0 | ||
| 25 | 2.40, m | 30.2 | L-Val | 57 | – | 176.0 | |
| 26 | 0.86a | 20.6 | 58 | 4.76, m | 57.7 | ||
| 27 | 0.92, d, 6.1 | 20.8 | 59 | 2.12, m | 32.5 | ||
| 24-NMe | 3.31 s | 31.9 | 60 | 0.96a | 20.4 | ||
| D-Val | 28 | – | 173.2 | 61 | 1.01a | 19.2 | |
| 29 | 4.76, m | 68.9 | Me-SAc | 62 | 166.5 | ||
| 30 | 2.68, m | 27.6 | 63/63’ | 3.67, d, 11.2; | 58.9 | ||
| 31 | 0.86a | 18.1 | 3.86, d, 11.2 | ||||
| 32 | 1.17, d, 6.5 | 23.3 | 63-SOMe | 2.79, s | 39.2 | ||
aOverlapped with other signals.
Figure 3COSY and key HMBC correlations (left) and MS/MS fragmentations of 2 and its ring-opened methanolysis product, respectively.
1H (500 MHz) and 13C (125 MHz) NMR data of theonellapeptolide If (3) in CD3OD [24].
| AA | Position | δH, m, | δC | AA | Position | δH, m, | δC |
| L-Thr | 1 | – | 169.2 | β-Ala | 33 | – | 173.2 |
| 2 | 4.38, m | 57.5 | 34/34’ | 2.29, m; 2.59, m | 36.5 | ||
| 3 | 5.15, m | 69.3 | 35/35’ | 3.10, m; 4.17, m | 36.8 | ||
| 4 | 1.13, d, 6.5 | 17.5 | L-Me-Ile | 36 | – | 172.5 | |
| D-Me-Val | 5 | – | 171.5 | 37 | 3.14, m | 71.2 | |
| 6 | 4.95, m | 62.2 | 38 | 2.48, m | 36.5 | ||
| 7 | 2.27a | 26.7 | 39/39’ | 1.04, m; 1.92a | 30.2 | ||
| 8 | 0.76, d, 7.2 | 11.5 | 40 | 1.00a | 13.2 | ||
| 9 | 0.99, d, 7.2 | 23.5 | 41 | 0.81, d, 6.4 | 15.3 | ||
| 6-NMe | 3.17, s | 31.3 | 37-NMe | 3.35, s | 39.9 | ||
| D-Leu | 42 | 176.2 | |||||
| D-Leu | 11 | – | 177.0 | 43 | 5.09, m | 50.6 | |
| 12 | 5.01, m | 48.5 | 44 | 1.72a; 1.25a | 41.2 | ||
| 13/13’ | 1.65a, 1.25a | 40.3 | 45 | 1.78a | 26.6 | ||
| 14 | 1.74a | 24.9 | 46 | 1.03a | 21.0 | ||
| 15 | 0.96a | 11.1 | 47 | 1.04a | 25.0 | ||
| 16 | 0.98 d, 7.3 | 17.2 | β- Ala | 48 | – | 175.0 | |
| β-Ala | 17 | – | 174.3 | 49/49’ | 2.28, m; 2.36, m | 39.1 | |
| 18/18’ | 2.23, m 2.31 m | 39.5 | 50/50’ | 3.14, m; 3.81, m | 37.7 | ||
| 19/19’ | 3.15, m 3.85, m | 38.2 | D-Me-Leu | 51 | – | 175.2 | |
| L-Me-Ala | 20 | – | 172.5 | 52 | 5.18, m | 56.4 | |
| 21 | 5.17a | 58.5 | 53/53’ | 1.41a; 2.03 m | 39.5 | ||
| 22 | 1.45, d, 7.1 | 16.0 | 54 | 1.52a | 27.1 | ||
| 21-NMe | 2.77 s | 30.5 | 55 | 0.83, d, 6.7 | 22.1 | ||
| L-Me-Val | 23 | – | 173.0 | 56 | 0.95a | 24.3 | |
| 24 | 5.02a | 59.4 | 52-NMe | 3.30 s | 33.0 | ||
| 25 | 2.40, m | 30.2 | L-Val | 57 | – | 176.0 | |
| 26 | 0.86a | 20.6 | 58 | 4.98, m | 54.6 | ||
| 27 | 0.92, d, 6.1 | 20.8 | 59 | 2.08, m | 31.6 | ||
| 24-NMe | 3.31 s | 31.9 | 60 | 0.98a | 20.4 | ||
| D-Val | 28 | – | 173.2 | 61 | 1.01a | 19.2 | |
| 29 | 4.76, m | 68.9 | MeO-Ac | 62 | 169.2 | ||
| 30 | 2.68, m | 27.6 | 63/63’ | 3.88, d, 11.2; | 71.8 | ||
| 31 | 0.86a | 18.1 | 3.97, d, 11.2 | ||||
| 32 | 1.17, d, 6.5 | 23.3 | 63-OMe | 3.38 | 59.1 | ||
aOverlapped with other signals.
Figure 4Antiproliferative activity of theonellapeptolides 1–3 on hepatic carcinoma cell line. The MTT assay was performed on HepG2 cells treated with increasing doses for 48 hours. Left panel: Proliferation rate expressed as Δ% of absorbance compared to untreated cells. The values are expressed as the mean ± standard error. Right panel: Computation of IC50 values. From top to bottom: Theonellapeptolide Id, sulfinyltheonellapeptolide and theonellapeptolide If (* p < 0.05 compared to untreated cells; n = 4).