Literature DB >> 24062589

Functional genomics in the study of yeast cell polarity: moving in the right direction.

Erin Styles1, Ji-Young Youn, Mojca Mattiazzi Usaj, Brenda Andrews.   

Abstract

The budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae has been used extensively for the study of cell polarity, owing to both its experimental tractability and the high conservation of cell polarity and other basic biological processes among eukaryotes. The budding yeast has also served as a pioneer model organism for virtually all genome-scale approaches, including functional genomics, which aims to define gene function and biological pathways systematically through the analysis of high-throughput experimental data. Here, we outline the contributions of functional genomics and high-throughput methodologies to the study of cell polarity in the budding yeast. We integrate data from published genetic screens that use a variety of functional genomics approaches to query different aspects of polarity. Our integrated dataset is enriched for polarity processes, as well as some processes that are not intrinsically linked to cell polarity, and may provide new areas for future study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Saccharomyces cerevisiae; functional genomics; genetics; microscopy; polarity; proteomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24062589      PMCID: PMC3785969          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  139 in total

1.  Comprehensive mass-spectrometry-based proteome quantification of haploid versus diploid yeast.

Authors:  Lyris M F de Godoy; Jesper V Olsen; Jürgen Cox; Michael L Nielsen; Nina C Hubner; Florian Fröhlich; Tobias C Walther; Matthias Mann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-09-28       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Systematic definition of protein constituents along the major polarization axis reveals an adaptive reuse of the polarization machinery in pheromone-treated budding yeast.

Authors:  Rammohan Narayanaswamy; Emily K Moradi; Wei Niu; G Traver Hart; Matthew Davis; Kriston L McGary; Andrew D Ellington; Edward M Marcotte
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 3.  A picture is worth a thousand words: genomics to phenomics in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Franco J Vizeacoumar; Yolanda Chong; Charles Boone; Brenda J Andrews
Journal:  FEBS Lett       Date:  2009-04-05       Impact factor: 4.124

4.  A molecular barcoded yeast ORF library enables mode-of-action analysis of bioactive compounds.

Authors:  Cheuk Hei Ho; Leslie Magtanong; Sarah L Barker; David Gresham; Shinichi Nishimura; Paramasivam Natarajan; Judice L Y Koh; Justin Porter; Christopher A Gray; Raymond J Andersen; Guri Giaever; Corey Nislow; Brenda Andrews; David Botstein; Todd R Graham; Minoru Yoshida; Charles Boone
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 54.908

5.  An in vivo map of the yeast protein interactome.

Authors:  Kirill Tarassov; Vincent Messier; Christian R Landry; Stevo Radinovic; Mercedes M Serna Molina; Igor Shames; Yelena Malitskaya; Jackie Vogel; Howard Bussey; Stephen W Michnick
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-05-08       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  High-quality binary protein interaction map of the yeast interactome network.

Authors:  Haiyuan Yu; Pascal Braun; Muhammed A Yildirim; Irma Lemmens; Kavitha Venkatesan; Julie Sahalie; Tomoko Hirozane-Kishikawa; Fana Gebreab; Na Li; Nicolas Simonis; Tong Hao; Jean-François Rual; Amélie Dricot; Alexei Vazquez; Ryan R Murray; Christophe Simon; Leah Tardivo; Stanley Tam; Nenad Svrzikapa; Changyu Fan; Anne-Sophie de Smet; Adriana Motyl; Michael E Hudson; Juyong Park; Xiaofeng Xin; Michael E Cusick; Troy Moore; Charlie Boone; Michael Snyder; Frederick P Roth; Albert-László Barabási; Jan Tavernier; David E Hill; Marc Vidal
Journal:  Science       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  The yeast vacuolar membrane proteome.

Authors:  Elena Wiederhold; Tejas Gandhi; Hjalmar P Permentier; Rainer Breitling; Bert Poolman; Dirk J Slotboom
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 5.911

8.  Plasma membrane microdomains regulate turnover of transport proteins in yeast.

Authors:  Guido Grossmann; Jan Malinsky; Wiebke Stahlschmidt; Martin Loibl; Ina Weig-Meckl; Wolf B Frommer; Miroslava Opekarová; Widmar Tanner
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2008-12-08       Impact factor: 10.539

9.  A comprehensive strategy enabling high-resolution functional analysis of the yeast genome.

Authors:  David K Breslow; Dale M Cameron; Sean R Collins; Maya Schuldiner; Jacob Stewart-Ornstein; Heather W Newman; Sigurd Braun; Hiten D Madhani; Nevan J Krogan; Jonathan S Weissman
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2008-07-11       Impact factor: 28.547

10.  Network hubs buffer environmental variation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Sasha F Levy; Mark L Siegal
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 8.029

View more
  6 in total

1.  Projecting cell polarity into the next decade.

Authors:  Attila Csikász-Nagy; Masamitsu Sato; Rafael E Carazo Salas
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-23       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Yeast model identifies ENTPD6 as a potential non-obstructive azoospermia pathogenic gene.

Authors:  Qian Wang; Chao Liu; Chaoming Tang; Huiping Guo; Yujiao Liu; Lina Wang; Haichao Zhao; Yongliang Shang; Yang Wen; Yuan Lin; Tao Zhou; Zuomin Zhou; Wen Dong; Zhibin Hu; Xuejiang Guo; Jiahao Sha; Wei Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Yeast as a Heterologous Model System to Uncover Type III Effector Function.

Authors:  Crina Popa; Núria S Coll; Marc Valls; Guido Sessa
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 6.823

4.  Translation factor mRNA granules direct protein synthetic capacity to regions of polarized growth.

Authors:  Mariavittoria Pizzinga; Christian Bates; Jennifer Lui; Gabriella Forte; Fabián Morales-Polanco; Emma Linney; Barbora Knotkova; Beverley Wilson; Clara A Solari; Luke E Berchowitz; Paula Portela; Mark P Ashe
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2019-03-15       Impact factor: 10.539

Review 5.  Yeast Gup1(2) Proteins Are Homologues of the Hedgehog Morphogens Acyltransferases HHAT(L): Facts and Implications.

Authors:  Cândida Lucas; Célia Ferreira; Giulia Cazzanelli; Ricardo Franco-Duarte; Joana Tulha
Journal:  J Dev Biol       Date:  2016-11-05

6.  Asymmetric Transcription Factor Partitioning During Yeast Cell Division Requires the FACT Chromatin Remodeler and Cell Cycle Progression.

Authors:  Eva Herrero; Sonia Stinus; Eleanor Bellows; Lisa K Berry; Henry Wood; Peter H Thorpe
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 4.562

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.