Patrick W Brady1, Linda M Goldenhar. 1. Division of Hospital Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, The James M. Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, , Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Situation awareness (SA)-the perception of data elements, comprehension of their meaning and projection of their status in the near future-has been associated with human performance in high-risk environments, including aviation and the operating room. The influences on SA in inpatient medicine are unknown. METHODS: We conducted seven focus groups with nurses, respiratory therapists and resident physicians using a standardised semistructured focus group guide to promote discussion. Recordings of the focus groups were transcribed verbatim, and transcripts were qualitatively analysed by two independent reviewers to identify convergent and divergent themes. RESULTS: Three themes emerged: (1) team-based care, (2) availability of standardised data and (3) standardised processes and procedures. We categorised these into social, technological and organisational influences on SA. Subthemes that emerged from each focus group were shared language to describe at-risk patients, provider experience in critical care/deterioration and interdisciplinary huddles to identify and plan for at-risk patients. An objective early warning score, proactive assessment and planning, adequate clinician staffing and tools for entering, displaying and monitoring data trends were identified by six of seven groups. Our data better reflected the concepts of team SA and shared SA than individual SA. CONCLUSIONS: Team-based care and standardisation support SA and the identification and treatment of patient risk in the complex environment of inpatient care. These findings can be used to guide the development and implementation of targeted interventions such as huddles to proactively scan for risk and electronic health record displays of data trends.
BACKGROUND: Situation awareness (SA)-the perception of data elements, comprehension of their meaning and projection of their status in the near future-has been associated with human performance in high-risk environments, including aviation and the operating room. The influences on SA in inpatient medicine are unknown. METHODS: We conducted seven focus groups with nurses, respiratory therapists and resident physicians using a standardised semistructured focus group guide to promote discussion. Recordings of the focus groups were transcribed verbatim, and transcripts were qualitatively analysed by two independent reviewers to identify convergent and divergent themes. RESULTS: Three themes emerged: (1) team-based care, (2) availability of standardised data and (3) standardised processes and procedures. We categorised these into social, technological and organisational influences on SA. Subthemes that emerged from each focus group were shared language to describe at-risk patients, provider experience in critical care/deterioration and interdisciplinary huddles to identify and plan for at-risk patients. An objective early warning score, proactive assessment and planning, adequate clinician staffing and tools for entering, displaying and monitoring data trends were identified by six of seven groups. Our data better reflected the concepts of team SA and shared SA than individual SA. CONCLUSIONS: Team-based care and standardisation support SA and the identification and treatment of patient risk in the complex environment of inpatient care. These findings can be used to guide the development and implementation of targeted interventions such as huddles to proactively scan for risk and electronic health record displays of data trends.
Authors: Andrea L Benin; Christopher P Borgstrom; Grace Y Jenq; Sarah A Roumanis; Leora I Horwitz Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2012-03-02 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Karen M Tucker; Tracy L Brewer; Rachel B Baker; Brenda Demeritt; Michael T Vossmeyer Journal: J Spec Pediatr Nurs Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 1.260
Authors: Susannah Fleming; Matthew Thompson; Richard Stevens; Carl Heneghan; Annette Plüddemann; Ian Maconochie; Lionel Tarassenko; David Mant Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-03-19 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Bill Shearer; Stuart Marshall; Michael David Buist; Monica Finnigan; Simon Kitto; Tonina Hore; Tamica Sturgess; Stuart Wilson; Wayne Ramsay Journal: BMJ Qual Saf Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 7.035
Authors: Stuart D Marshall; Simon Kitto; William Shearer; Stuart J Wilson; Monica A Finnigan; Tamica Sturgess; Tonina Hore; Michael D Buist Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2011-04-16 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: B Alex Dummett; Carmen Adams; Elizabeth Scruth; Vincent Liu; Margaret Guo; Gabriel J Escobar Journal: J Hosp Med Date: 2016-11 Impact factor: 2.960
Authors: Patrick W Brady; Barbara K Giambra; Susan N Sherman; Caitlin Clohessy; Allison M Loechtenfeldt; Kathleen E Walsh; Samir S Shah; Carole Lannon Journal: Hosp Pediatr Date: 2020-08-12