BACKGROUND: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from grafts in the circulation of transplant recipients is a potential biomarker of rejection. Its usefulness was investigated after heart transplantation during the maintenance phase by use of microarrays and massive parallel sequencing of donor and recipient DNA. Disadvantages of these methods are high costs, long turnaround times, and need for donor DNA. Therefore, we sought to develop a rapid and cost-effective method using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). METHODS: Plasma samples were collected from stable recipients after liver (LTx, n = 10), kidney (KTx, n = 9), and heart (HTx, n = 8) transplantation as well as from 7 additional patients directly after LTx. Known single-nucleotide polymorphisms were selected for high minor allelic frequencies, of which 41 hydrolysis probe assays were established. Plasma cfDNA was preamplified, followed by conventional real-time PCR to define informative (heterologous) SNPs, which were then used for quantification (percentage) of graft-derived cfDNA (GcfDNA) using ddPCR. RESULTS: Mean recovery was 94% (SD, 13%) with an imprecision of 4%-14% with the use of controls with 2% minor allele. GcfDNA in stable patients was <6.8% (LTx), <2.5% (KTx), and <3.4% (HTx). On the day of LTx, GcfDNA was approximately 90% and by day 10 it was <15% in complication-free LTx recipients. In 2 patients with biopsy-proven rejection, GcfDNA increased to >60%, whereas in 1 patient with cholestasis no increase was found. CONCLUSIONS: A novel, cost-effective, rapid technique was developed to quantify GcfDNA in transplant recipients. This technique embodies a promising, potentially universal biomarker for early detection of rejection, which could enable more effective therapeutic interventions.
BACKGROUND: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from grafts in the circulation of transplant recipients is a potential biomarker of rejection. Its usefulness was investigated after heart transplantation during the maintenance phase by use of microarrays and massive parallel sequencing of donor and recipient DNA. Disadvantages of these methods are high costs, long turnaround times, and need for donor DNA. Therefore, we sought to develop a rapid and cost-effective method using digital droplet PCR (ddPCR). METHODS: Plasma samples were collected from stable recipients after liver (LTx, n = 10), kidney (KTx, n = 9), and heart (HTx, n = 8) transplantation as well as from 7 additional patients directly after LTx. Known single-nucleotide polymorphisms were selected for high minor allelic frequencies, of which 41 hydrolysis probe assays were established. Plasma cfDNA was preamplified, followed by conventional real-time PCR to define informative (heterologous) SNPs, which were then used for quantification (percentage) of graft-derived cfDNA (GcfDNA) using ddPCR. RESULTS: Mean recovery was 94% (SD, 13%) with an imprecision of 4%-14% with the use of controls with 2% minor allele. GcfDNA in stable patients was <6.8% (LTx), <2.5% (KTx), and <3.4% (HTx). On the day of LTx, GcfDNA was approximately 90% and by day 10 it was <15% in complication-free LTx recipients. In 2 patients with biopsy-proven rejection, GcfDNA increased to >60%, whereas in 1 patient with cholestasis no increase was found. CONCLUSIONS: A novel, cost-effective, rapid technique was developed to quantify GcfDNA in transplant recipients. This technique embodies a promising, potentially universal biomarker for early detection of rejection, which could enable more effective therapeutic interventions.
Authors: Michael Oellerich; Karen Sherwood; Paul Keown; Ekkehard Schütz; Julia Beck; Johannes Stegbauer; Lars Christian Rump; Philip D Walson Journal: Nat Rev Nephrol Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 28.314
Authors: Jun Zou; Brian Duffy; Michael Slade; Andrew Lee Young; Nancy Steward; Ramsey Hachem; T Mohanakumar Journal: Hum Immunol Date: 2017-03-04 Impact factor: 2.850
Authors: Roy D Bloom; Jonathan S Bromberg; Emilio D Poggio; Suphamai Bunnapradist; Anthony J Langone; Puneet Sood; Arthur J Matas; Shikha Mehta; Roslyn B Mannon; Asif Sharfuddin; Bernard Fischbach; Mohanram Narayanan; Stanley C Jordan; David Cohen; Matthew R Weir; David Hiller; Preethi Prasad; Robert N Woodward; Marica Grskovic; John J Sninsky; James P Yee; Daniel C Brennan Journal: J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2017-03-09 Impact factor: 10.121
Authors: Roni Lehmann-Werman; Daniel Neiman; Hai Zemmour; Joshua Moss; Judith Magenheim; Adi Vaknin-Dembinsky; Sten Rubertsson; Bengt Nellgård; Kaj Blennow; Henrik Zetterberg; Kirsty Spalding; Michael J Haller; Clive H Wasserfall; Desmond A Schatz; Carla J Greenbaum; Craig Dorrell; Markus Grompe; Aviad Zick; Ayala Hubert; Myriam Maoz; Volker Fendrich; Detlef K Bartsch; Talia Golan; Shmuel A Ben Sasson; Gideon Zamir; Aharon Razin; Howard Cedar; A M James Shapiro; Benjamin Glaser; Ruth Shemer; Yuval Dor Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 11.205