Literature DB >> 24060991

Is this my finger? Proprioceptive illusions of body ownership and representation.

Martin E Héroux1, Lee D Walsh, Annie A Butler, Simon C Gandevia.   

Abstract

Body 'ownership' defines which things belong to us and can be manipulated by signals from cutaneous or muscle receptors. Whether signals from muscle proprioceptors on their own influence perceived ownership is unknown. We used finger-joint movement to induce illusory ownership of an artificial finger without vision. We coupled the subject's index finger to an artificial finger 12 cm above it. The experimenter held the subject's other index finger and thumb on the artificial finger and passively moved them congruently or incongruently for 3 min with the index finger and the grasping index finger and thumb intact or anaesthetised. When intact, congruent movement (19 subjects) reduced perceived vertical distance between index fingers to 1.0 (0.0, 2.0) cm [median (IQR)] from 3.0 (3.0, 4.0) cm with incongruent movement (P < 0.01). Simply grasping the artificial finger reduced perceived spacing between the grasping and test index fingers from 6.0 (5.0, 9.0) cm to 3.0 (3.0, 6.0) cm (P < 0.01), a new grasp illusion. Digital anaesthesia eliminated this grasp effect, after which congruent movement still reduced the perceived spacing between the index fingers to 1.0 (0.0, 2.75) cm compared to 4.0 (3.25, 6.0) cm with incongruent movement (P < 0.001). Subjects more strongly agreed that they were holding their own finger after congruent but not incongruent movement (P < 0.01). We propose that the brain generates possible scenarios and tests them against available sensory information. This process can function without vision or motor commands, and with only one channel of somatic information.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24060991      PMCID: PMC3853502          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.261461

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  28 in total

1.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation.

Authors:  S J Blakemore; D M Wolpert; C D Frith
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  The cerebellum and the timing of coordinated eye and hand tracking.

Authors:  R C Miall; G Z Reckess
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 2.310

3.  Two eyes for an eye: the neuroscience of force escalation.

Authors:  Sukhwinder S Shergill; Paul M Bays; Chris D Frith; Daniel M Wolpert
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-07-11       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The illusion of changed position and movement from vibrating one arm is altered by vision or movement of the other arm.

Authors:  Masahiko Izumizaki; Mikio Tsuge; Lena Akai; Uwe Proske; Ikuo Homma
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2010-06-14       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Finger movement responses of cutaneous mechanoreceptors in the dorsal skin of the human hand.

Authors:  B B Edin; J H Abbs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Paroxysmal alien limb phenomena due to epileptic seizures and electrical cortical stimulation.

Authors:  Frank Boesebeck; Alois Ebner
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  The neuroanatomy of asomatognosia and somatoparaphrenia.

Authors:  Todd E Feinberg; Annalena Venneri; Anna Maria Simone; Yan Fan; Georg Northoff
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2009-09-24       Impact factor: 10.154

8.  Muscle spindle activity in man during shortening and lengthening contractions.

Authors:  D Burke; K E Hagbarth; L Löfstedt
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1978-04       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The Rubber Hand Illusion: feeling of ownership and proprioceptive drift do not go hand in hand.

Authors:  Marieke Rohde; Massimiliano Di Luca; Marc O Ernst
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-06-28       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Rubber hands feel touch, but not in blind individuals.

Authors:  Valeria I Petkova; Hedvig Zetterberg; H Henrik Ehrsson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

1.  Time, touch and temperature affect perceived finger position and ownership in the grasp illusion.

Authors:  Martin E Héroux; Nicolas Bayle; Annie A Butler; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Spatial information from cutaneous and muscle receptors contributes to perceived finger position and ownership.

Authors:  Jack Brooks
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Highlights from the 2017 meeting of the Society for Neural Control of Movement (Dublin, Ireland).

Authors:  Juan Alvaro Gallego; Robert M Hardwick; Emily R Oby
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.386

4.  Judgements of hand location and hand spacing show minimal proprioceptive drift.

Authors:  Alex Rana; Annie A Butler; Simon C Gandevia; Martin E Héroux
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2020-05-27       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  How Weight Affects the Perceived Spacing between the Thumb and Fingers during Grasping.

Authors:  Annie A Butler; Martin E Héroux; Simon C Gandevia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of horizontal distance and limb crossing on perceived hand spacing and ownership: Differential sensory processing across hand configurations.

Authors:  Hassan G Qureshi; Annie A Butler; Graham K Kerr; Simon C Gandevia; Martin E Héroux
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Do interoception and attending to the upper limbs affect body ownership and body representation in the grasp illusion?

Authors:  Annie A Butler; Lucy S Robertson; Audrey P Wang; Simon C Gandevia; Martin E Héroux
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.