Literature DB >> 24060048

Segmental motion of forefoot and hindfoot as a diagnostic tool.

Nori Okita1, Steven A Meyers, John H Challis, Neil A Sharkey.   

Abstract

Segmental motions derived from non-invasive motion analysis are being used to investigate the intrinsic functional behavior of the foot and ankle in health and disease. The goal of this research was to examine the ability of a generic segmented model of the foot to capture and differentiate changes in internal skeletal kinematics due to neuromuscular disease and/or trauma. A robotic apparatus that reproduces the kinematics and kinetics of gait in cadaver lower extremities was employed to produce motion under normal and aberrant neuromuscular activation patterns of tibialis posterior and/or tibialis anterior. Stance phase simulations were conducted on 10 donor limbs while recording three-dimensional kinematic trajectories of (1) skin-mounted markers used clinically to construct segmented foot models, and (2) bone-mounted marker clusters to capture actual internal bone motion as the gold standard for comparison. The models constructed from external marker data were able to differentiate the kinematic behaviors elicited by different neuromuscular conditions in a manner similar to that using the bone-derived data. Measurable differences between internal and externally measured kinematics were small, variable and random across the three axes of rotation and neuromuscular conditions, with a tendency toward more differences noted during early and late stance. Albeit slightly different, three-dimensional motion profiles of the hindfoot and forefoot segments correlated well with internal skeletal motion under all neuromuscular conditions, thereby confirming the utility of measuring segmental motions as a valid means of clinical assessment.
© 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Foot and ankle modeling; Gait simulation; Motion Analysis; Neuromuscular dysfunction

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24060048      PMCID: PMC3845905          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2013.08.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  23 in total

1.  Differences in ankle-joint complex motion during the stance phase of walking as measured by superficial and bone-anchored markers.

Authors:  Pär Westblad; Takeshi Hashimoto; Ian Winson; Arne Lundberg; Anton Arndt
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.827

2.  The effect of posterior tibialis tendon dysfunction on the plantar pressure characteristics and the kinematics of the arch and the hindfoot.

Authors:  Carl W Imhauser; Sorin Siegler; Nicholas A Abidi; David Z Frankel
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.063

3.  Analysis of a kinetic multi-segment foot model. Part I: Model repeatability and kinematic validity.

Authors:  Dustin A Bruening; Kevin M Cooney; Frank L Buczek
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 2.840

4.  [Contribution of electromyographic analysis of the walking habits of children with spastic foot in cerebral palsy: a preliminary study].

Authors:  A Renders; C Detrembleur; R Rossillon; T Lejeune; J J Rombouts
Journal:  Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot       Date:  1997

5.  Rear-foot, mid-foot and fore-foot motion during the stance phase of gait.

Authors:  A Leardini; M G Benedetti; L Berti; D Bettinelli; R Nativo; S Giannini
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2006-09-11       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Foot and ankle kinematics in patients with posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Mary Ellen Ness; Jason Long; Richard Marks; Gerald Harris
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Foot kinematics during walking measured using bone and surface mounted markers.

Authors:  C Nester; R K Jones; A Liu; D Howard; A Lundberg; A Arndt; P Lundgren; A Stacoff; P Wolf
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2007-07-16       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Tibialis posterior tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  K A Johnson; D E Strom
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  A procedure for determining rigid body transformation parameters.

Authors:  J H Challis
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.712

10.  Ankle and foot kinematics associated with stage II PTTD during stance.

Authors:  Jeff R Houck; Christopher G Neville; Josh Tome; Adolph S Flemister
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.827

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.