Literature DB >> 12356185

Differences in ankle-joint complex motion during the stance phase of walking as measured by superficial and bone-anchored markers.

Pär Westblad1, Takeshi Hashimoto, Ian Winson, Arne Lundberg, Anton Arndt.   

Abstract

Bones of the ankle-joint complex are difficult to represent with superficial markers and an invasive approach is required to quantify skin movement artifact. Three-dimensional coordinates during gait were first calculated from sets of three superficial markers located on both the lower leg and heel. Intracortical pins equipped with external marker arrays were subsequently inserted in the tibia, talus and calcaneus for further trials. Tibiocalcaneal and talocalcaneal joint helical axis component rotations were calculated. Intersubject motion patterns were comparable. Root mean square (RMS) differences were chosen to describe discrepancies between temporal intracortical pin and superficial marker curves. Results for the tibiocalcaneal rotations inversion/eversion, plantarflexion/ dorsiflexion and abduction/adduction were 2.5 degrees, 1.7 degrees and 2.8 degrees respectively. Inversion/eversion about the talocalcaneal joint showed an RMS difference of 2.1 degrees. A systematic over- or underestimation of superficial relative to bone-anchored markers could not be determined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12356185     DOI: 10.1177/107110070202300914

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  16 in total

Review 1.  The relation between geometry and function of the ankle joint complex: a biomechanical review.

Authors:  Roeland P Kleipool; Leendert Blankevoort
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2010-03-19       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Helical axis calculation based on Burmester theory: experimental comparison with traditional techniques for human tibiotalar joint motion.

Authors:  N Sancisi; V Parenti-Castelli; F Corazza; A Leardini
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Segmental foot mobility in individuals with and without diabetes and neuropathy.

Authors:  Smita Rao; Charles Saltzman; H John Yack
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 2.063

Review 4.  Ankle and foot power in gait analysis: Implications for science, technology and clinical assessment.

Authors:  Karl E Zelik; Eric C Honert
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  Foot kinematics during a bilateral heel rise test in participants with stage II posterior tibial tendon dysfunction.

Authors:  Jeff R Houck; Christopher Neville; Josh Tome; A Samuel Flemister
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 4.751

6.  Ankle and foot kinematics associated with stage II PTTD during stance.

Authors:  Jeff R Houck; Christopher G Neville; Josh Tome; Adolph S Flemister
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 2.827

7.  Segmental motion of forefoot and hindfoot as a diagnostic tool.

Authors:  Nori Okita; Steven A Meyers; John H Challis; Neil A Sharkey
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2013-09-07       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  Kinematics of the ankle and foot. In vivo roentgen stereophotogrammetry.

Authors:  A Lundberg
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand Suppl       Date:  1989

9.  Direct assessment of 3D foot bone kinematics using biplanar X-ray fluoroscopy and an automatic model registration method.

Authors:  Kohta Ito; Koh Hosoda; Masahiro Shimizu; Shuhei Ikemoto; Shinnosuke Kume; Takeo Nagura; Nobuaki Imanishi; Sadakazu Aiso; Masahiro Jinzaki; Naomichi Ogihara
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 2.303

10.  Repeatability of a multi-segment foot model with a 15-marker set in healthy adults.

Authors:  Sang Gyo Seo; Dong Yeon Lee; Hyuk Ju Moon; Sung Ju Kim; Jihyeung Kim; Kyoung Min Lee; Chin Youb Chung; In Ho Choi
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2014-04-22       Impact factor: 2.303

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.