| Literature DB >> 24059682 |
Tom L G M van den Kerkhof1, K Anton Feenstra, Zelda Euler, Marit J van Gils, Linda W E Rijsdijk, Brigitte D Boeser-Nunnink, Jaap Heringa, Hanneke Schuitemaker, Rogier W Sanders.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Current HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env) vaccines are unable to induce cross-reactive neutralizing antibodies. However, such antibodies are elicited in 10-30% of HIV-1 infected individuals, but it is unknown why these antibodies are induced in some individuals and not in others. We hypothesized that the Envs of early HIV-1 variants in individuals who develop cross-reactive neutralizing activity (CrNA) might have unique characteristics that support the induction of CrNA.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24059682 PMCID: PMC3849187 DOI: 10.1186/1742-4690-10-102
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Retrovirology ISSN: 1742-4690 Impact factor: 4.602
Figure 1Sampling of viruses and sera. Time bars showing the period in which viruses were isolated and the period in which sera were obtained for assessment of neutralizing activity. The white, grey and dark grey bars represent the individuals with non-CrNA (n=9), intermediate CrNA (n=10) and CrNA (n=12), respectively. The x-axis represents the months post-SC. The box-plots represent the sampling periods with minimum and maximum time points indicated by whiskers. The median time points of virus and sera sampling for the 31 individuals are indicated by solid vertical lines in the boxes.
Individual’s data summary
| ACH19829 | 297 | 6 | 26-jan-86 | 10.5 | 440 | 3.9 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH18969 | 275 | 5 | 29-Oct-87 | 1.8 | 520 | 4.3 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH19308 | 231 | 5 | 14-jul-91 | 3.3 | 380 | 4.4 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH18814 | 230 | 6 | 27-jul-87 | 3.2 | 500 | 5.1 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH18818 | 205 | 4 | 26-jan-86 | 8.2 | 510 | 5.4 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH19885 | 180 | 5 | 28-dec-94 | 2.9 | 580 | 3.3 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH11668 | 169 | 5 | 28-jun-86 | 7.9 | 380 | 4.5 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH19463 | 164 | 5 | 14-jul-86 | 2.1 | 350 | 4.8 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH19507 | 140 | 6 | 23-apr-88 | 7.9 | 400 | 5.0 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH19474 | 126 | 5 | 27-jul-87 | 12.7 | 410 | 3.0 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH19999 | 111 | 4 | 26-aug-85 | 4.3 | 1060 | 4.6 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH19793 | 93 | 4 | 28-jun-86 | 12.3 | 1000 | 4.5 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH19588 | 91 | 4 | 20-nov-85 | 13.8 | 600 | 5.3 | gp160 | - | - |
| ACH19566 | 78 | 5 | 11-Mar-85 | 13.2 | 610 | 3.5 | C1-V5 | - | - |
| ACH19768 | 64 | 5 | 6-apr-86 | 2.2 | 370 | 3.7 | gp160 | - | - |
| ACH18860 | 64 | 2 | 25-aug-86 | 2.6 | 550 | 4.9 | C1-V5 | - | - |
| ACH18839 | 64 | 3 | 17-Oct-86 | 3.3 | 330 | 3.8 | C1-V5 | - | - |
| ACH19542 | 45 | 3 | 23-jun-85 | 4.5 | 310 | 3.9 | gp160 | - | - |
| ACH18766 | 43 | 1 | 15-jul-88 | 5.1 | 760 | 4.3 | gp160 | - | - |
| ACH19861 | 43 | 3 | 24-feb-89 | 3.0 | 470 | 4.3 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH19453 | 39 | 3 | 23-dec-85 | 7.0 | 810 | 3.0 | gp160 | - | - |
| ACH18829 | 38 | 3 | 2-feb-87 | 4.0 | 770 | 2.6 | C1-V5 | - | - |
| ACH19792 | 34 | 2 | 8-nov-85 | 6.9 | 450 | 4.9 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH19961 | 31 | 0 | 14-sep-87 | 2.4 | 530 | 4.5 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH19329 | 31 | 1 | 28-dec-94 | 4.3 | 780 | 3.9 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH19974 | 29 | 2 | 26-jan-86 | 8.8 | 550 | 3.5 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH19489 | 29 | 0 | 30-sep-85 | 7.4 | 550 | 3.1 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH18887 | 29 | 1 | 7-dec-89 | 8.8 | 670 | 4.6 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH19342 | 28 | 2 | 14-jul-86 | 3.0 | 700 | 3.9 | C1-V5 | - | - |
| ACH19576 | 23 | 1 | 2-feb-88 | 7.0 | 500 | 4.5 | gp160 | + | + |
| ACH18880 | 20 | 0 | 28-jun-86 | 10.4 | 860 | 4.8 | gp160 | + | + |
aNeutralization titers are expressed as the geometric mean of the reciprocal plasma dilution that inhibited virus infection by 50% for the panel of 6 heterologous viruses.
bThe number of viruses neutralized, at least 3-fold higher than the IC50 of the same serum with MLV, from the panel of 6 heterologous viruses from different subtypes.
cDate of seroconversion (SC).
dMonths post SC to time of clonal virus isolation (CVI).
eCD4+ T-cell (CD4+) count at setpoint (SP).
fLog viral load at setpoint (SP).
Env fragment sequenced.
hIndividuals from which viruses were used in the neutralization sensitivity assay with MAbs and polyclonal HIVIg pools are indicated with +.
IIndividuals from which viral sequences were used in the Sequence Harmony model are indicated with +.
Figure 2Short V1 sequences and lower probability of overall glycosylation correlate with the development of cross-reactive neutralizing activity. Scatter plots of individual’s geometric mean IC50 titer across the 6 virus panel (x-axis) versus sequence characteristics of the gp160s from clonal virus isolates on the y-axis. (A) length of gp160 in amino acids (AA); (B) length of variable region 1 (V1) in amino acids (AA); (C) total number of PNGS in gp160; (D) number of NXS motifs relative to the total number of PNGS.
Figure 3Lower probability of glycosylation at position 332 correlates with the induction of cross-reactive neutralizing activity. (A) Pie charts representing the distribution of NLS and NIS PNGS motifs at position 332 between 12 individuals who developed and 9 individuals who did not develop CrNA. Red and green represent NLS and NIS motifs, respectively. (B) Residual virus infectivity in the presence of high concentrations of 2G12 (25 μg/ml), excluding viruses lacking one or more of the essential 2G12 glycans 295, 332, 386 or 392 [61,62,85], for virus clones that have NLS or NIS motif. (C) Residual virus infectivity in the presence of high concentrations of PGT126 (5 μg/ml), for virus clones that have NLS or NIS motifs. Values in the gray area are considered sensitive, while values in the white area are considered resistant.
Sequence Harmony results
| | | | | | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C1 | E32 | 0.825 | −5.5 | Egd | Edkng | 1 |
| C1 | K33 | 0.765 | −6.7 | KQn_e | QNdek | 1 |
| C1 | V85 | 0.792 | −4.8 | Vkaei | Ver | 2 |
| C1 | V87 | 0.843 | −4.9 | Ekg | Eadg | 2 |
| C1 | K97 | 0.840 | −5.1 | Kint | Knr | 3 |
| C1 | K130 | 0.843 | −8.5 | Ne | Nd | 4 |
| V1 | L134 | 0.620 | −11.4 | Lf | VL_aim | 5 |
| V1 | K135 | 0.346 | −17.0 | RKeqg | -hknwg | 5 |
| V1 | N136 | 0.698 | −12.9 | Nt | N-t | 5 |
| V1 | T138 | 0.585 | −14.4 | Tn_ | -gast | 6 |
| V1 | N139 | 0.650 | −12.5 | N_t | -nist | 6 |
| V1 | T140 | 0.531 | −12.0 | Tiks_n | -alns | 6 |
| V1 | .141 | 0.522 | −13.2 | T-spgn | SR-egk | 6 |
| V1 | .141 | 0.368 | −38.3 | -tn | N | 6 |
| V1 | .141 | 0.223 | −24.4 | -sktni | TAeiv | 6 |
| V1 | .141 | 0.000 | −69.1 | -h | T | 6 |
| V1 | .141 | 0.000 | −45.6 | - | Nads | 6 |
| V1 | .141 | 0.664 | −16.1 | -ts | Tnsa_ | 6 |
| V1 | N141 | 0.418 | −21.7 | NTs | N-tip | 6 |
| V1 | S142 | 0.697 | −12.1 | Ns | Nt_i | 6 |
| V1 | .145 | 0.518 | −17.3 | W-g | Snw_ | |
| V1 | .146 | 0.507 | −15.8 | -m | LI-vg | |
| V1 | K151 | 0.696 | −8.3 | E-GRtak | GK-qte | 6 |
| C2 | E268 | 0.814 | −4.6 | Ekqg | Edgr | 7 |
| C2 | V271 | 0.719 | −15.3 | Vi | Va | 8 |
| C2 | V275 | 0.587 | −9.0 | Eknvad | Esnqk | 3 |
| V3 | K322 | 0.611 | −17.4 | DE | Eaq | 9 |
| C3 | I333 | 0.804 | −15.5 | Li | Il | 10 |
| C3 | A336 | 0.684 | −9.1 | TAgvel | Aekv | 10 |
| C3 | K337 | 0.686 | −10.1 | EQKntd | Knq | 10 |
| C3 | K343 | 0.667 | −8.4 | Kqsg | EQKgnh | 11 |
| C3 | A346 | 0.809 | −15.9 | AV | V | 11 |
| C3 | S347 | 0.837 | −3.1 | TIndesk | NKEITr | 11 |
| V4 | F396 | 0.578 | −16.4 | NT-wf | -NG | 11 |
| V4 | T399 | 0.604 | −10.9 | -vt | RT-ans | 11 |
| V4 | .403 | 0.686 | −16.1 | -t | N-s | |
| V4 | .404 | 0.537 | −11.7 | -ksr | KT-epn | |
| V4 | S405 | 0.661 | −15.4 | -Sdl | -evs | 10 |
| V4 | N406 | 0.377 | −34.9 | N_t | -n | 10 |
| V4 | N407 | 0.277 | −18.9 | N_srk | -thn | 10 |
| V4 | .412 | 0.574 | −13.5 | -s | N-wde | |
| V4 | .412 | 0.689 | −11.6 | - | -snt | |
| C4 | S440 | 0.729 | −6.8 | Raks | KReg | 12 |
| V5 | S461 | 0.650 | −14.0 | DE-sn | -n | |
| V5 | .464 | 0.692 | −9.4 | NEK- | -rk | 13 |
| V5 | .464 | 0.557 | −15.2 | -nda | -Nti | 13 |
| gp41 | Q621 | 0.540 | −9.4 | Kestardq | EMYQNK | |
aAmino acid numbering based on the HXB2 reference sequence.
bSequence Harmony scores (SH-scores): SH-scores below a cut-off of <0.7 for variable regions and a cut-off of <0.85 for conserved regions are shown.
cThe z-scores display the accuracy of a given result; the more negative the z-score the less likely it is that the results was found by chance.
dThe ’consensus string’ shows the residues found in each group on that specific site ordered by frequency were a lower case letter is present less than half the amount of the most abundant residue (upper case).
eIndividuals who developed CrNA.
fIndividuals who did not develop CrNA.
gNumbers represent the subclusters as defined in Additional file 5: Table S2.
Figure 4Three dimensional clustering of amino acid positions that differ between individuals that induce CrNA and those that do not. Side (A) and top (B) views of the Env spike. The structures of three gp120 protomers, including the entire gp120 sequence and modeled as described in the Methods section, were fitted into the cry-EM density of the virus-associated Env spike [87]. A backbone trace of one protomer is colored in red and the positions revealed by SH are indicated in yellow space filling in the same protomer. (C, D). Model of gp120 with the same color-code as in A and B. Various Env subdomains are indicated in black font. Residues identified by SH are labeled in blue. The views are from the approach of CD4 (C) or rotated by 90° over the y-axis (D). The viral membrane would be at the top and the target membrane at the bottom. (E, F). Details of the V4 domain and its association with the α2 helix of the C3 domain. The residues identified by SH are indicated in sticks.
Figure 5Sensitivity to bNAbs does not correlate with the induction of cross-reactive neutralizing activity. Sensitivity to neutralization by b12, VRC01, 447-52D, 2G12, PGT121, PGT126, PG9, PG16, PGT145, 2F5 and 4E10 and polyclonal HIVIg (three different sera pools) of viral variants obtained from 12 individuals who developed CrNA (grey bars) and 9 individuals who did not develop CrNA (white bars). Median IC50 values per individual per bNAb or HIVIg as determined by linear regression are used and differences were considered statistically significant when P values were ≤ 0.05, represented by an asterix. The bNAbs are ordered from left to right according to their epitope cluster.