| Literature DB >> 24058263 |
Shirley Miller1, Brandy-Joe Milliron, Kathleen Woolf.
Abstract
The accuracy of 6 resting metabolic rate (RMR) prediction equations to indirect calorimetry was compared in 38 Hispanic women (age = 30 ± 7 years; body mass index = 28.9 ± 7.2 kg/m2; body fat = 42% ± 8%). Paired t tests examined differences between predicted and measured RMR; significance defined as P < 0.05. Bias and agreement were displayed using Bland-Altman plots. Accuracy was defined when the predicted RMR was ± 10% of the measured RMR. Data were analyzed with SPSS (version 19). Only the equation of Owen et al was not significantly different from the measured RMR (1336 ± 142 and 1322 ± 203 kcal/d, respectively). The equation of Owen et al was accurate for 84.2% of women; RMR prediction equations had limited applicability for young Hispanic women.Entities:
Keywords: Hispanic women; prediction equations; resting metabolic rate
Year: 2013 PMID: 24058263 PMCID: PMC3779143 DOI: 10.1097/TIN.0b013e31828d7a1b
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Top Clin Nutr ISSN: 0883-5691 Impact factor: 0.508