BACKGROUND: Successful community-academic research partnerships require building the capacity of both community-based organizations (CBOs) and academics to conduct collaborative research of mutual interest and benefit. Yet, information about the needs and goals of research-interested CBOs is lacking. Our partnership aimed to conduct a community research needs assessment and to use results to develop future capacity-building programs for CBOs. METHODS: Based on our review of the literature, informal interviews with research-interested CBOs and community-engaged research groups locally and nationally, we developed a needs assessment survey. Key domains of this survey included history and experience with research collaboration, interest in specific research topics, and preference for learning format and structure. We trained community health workers (CHWs) to recruit senior leaders from CBOs in New York City (NYC) and encourage them to complete an on-line survey. RESULTS: Fully 54% (33/61) of CBOs completed the needs assessment. Most (69%) reported involvement with research or evaluation in the last 2 years and 33% had some funding for research. Although 75% had collaborated with academic institutions in the past, 58% did not rate this experience well. The four areas respondents prioritized for skills building were program evaluation, developing needs assessments, building surveys, and understanding statistical analyses. They were less interested in learning to build collaborations with academics. CONCLUSIONS: A formal needs assessment of research training and educational needs of CBOs revealed that most had experience, albeit negative, with academic collaborations. CBO leaders wanted to build skills to conduct and analyze assessments and program evaluations. Our community-academic partnership is using these findings to develop a research capacity-building course. Other partnerships should consider conducting such assessments to transform the capacity of CBOs to be active research partners and leaders.
BACKGROUND: Successful community-academic research partnerships require building the capacity of both community-based organizations (CBOs) and academics to conduct collaborative research of mutual interest and benefit. Yet, information about the needs and goals of research-interested CBOs is lacking. Our partnership aimed to conduct a community research needs assessment and to use results to develop future capacity-building programs for CBOs. METHODS: Based on our review of the literature, informal interviews with research-interested CBOs and community-engaged research groups locally and nationally, we developed a needs assessment survey. Key domains of this survey included history and experience with research collaboration, interest in specific research topics, and preference for learning format and structure. We trained community health workers (CHWs) to recruit senior leaders from CBOs in New York City (NYC) and encourage them to complete an on-line survey. RESULTS: Fully 54% (33/61) of CBOs completed the needs assessment. Most (69%) reported involvement with research or evaluation in the last 2 years and 33% had some funding for research. Although 75% had collaborated with academic institutions in the past, 58% did not rate this experience well. The four areas respondents prioritized for skills building were program evaluation, developing needs assessments, building surveys, and understanding statistical analyses. They were less interested in learning to build collaborations with academics. CONCLUSIONS: A formal needs assessment of research training and educational needs of CBOs revealed that most had experience, albeit negative, with academic collaborations. CBO leaders wanted to build skills to conduct and analyze assessments and program evaluations. Our community-academic partnership is using these findings to develop a research capacity-building course. Other partnerships should consider conducting such assessments to transform the capacity of CBOs to be active research partners and leaders.
Authors: Barbara A Israel; Chris M Coombe; Rebecca R Cheezum; Amy J Schulz; Robert J McGranaghan; Richard Lichtenstein; Angela G Reyes; Jaye Clement; Akosua Burris Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2010-09-23 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Derek M Griffith; Julie Ober Allen; E Hill DeLoney; Kevin Robinson; E Yvonne Lewis; Bettina Campbell; Susan Morrel-Samuels; Arlene Sparks; Marc A Zimmerman; Thomas Reischl Journal: J Prim Prev Date: 2010-04
Authors: Kathryn L Braun; Tung T Nguyen; Sora Park Tanjasiri; Janis Campbell; Sue P Heiney; Heather M Brandt; Selina A Smith; Daniel S Blumenthal; Margaret Hargreaves; Kathryn Coe; Grace X Ma; Donna Kenerson; Kushal Patel; JoAnn Tsark; James R Hébert Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2011-11-28 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Emily E Anderson; Stephanie Solomon; Elizabeth Heitman; James M DuBois; Celia B Fisher; Rhonda G Kost; Mary Ellen Lawless; Cornelia Ramsey; Bonnie Jones; Alice Ammerman; Lainie Friedman Ross Journal: J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics Date: 2012-04 Impact factor: 1.742
Authors: Francis H Barchi; Megan Kasimatis-Singleton; Mary Kasule; Pilate Khulumani; Jon F Merz Journal: BMC Med Educ Date: 2013-02-01 Impact factor: 2.463
Authors: Benjamin Kaplan; Carolyn Caddle-Steele; Gregory Chisholm; Warria A Esmond; Kadija Ferryman; Melvin Gertner; Crispin Goytia; Diane Hauser; Lynne D Richardson; Mimsie Robinson; Carol R Horowitz Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2017
Authors: Jennifer Cunningham-Erves; Yvonne Joosten; Charrise P Hollingsworth; Joshua D Cockroft; Velma M Murry; Lexie Lipham; Patrick Luther; Yolanda Vaughn; Stephania T Miller Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2020
Authors: Qianling Zhou; Sunita M Stewart; Alice Wan; Charles Sai-Cheong Leung; Agnes Y Lai; Tai Hing Lam; Sophia Siu-Chee Chan Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2017-02-13