BACKGROUND: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) strives for equitable collaboration among community and academic partners throughout the research process. To build the capacity of academia to function as effective research partners with communities, the North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS), home of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH)'s Clinical and Translational Sciences Award (CTSA), developed a community engagement consulting model. This new model harnesses the expertise of community partners with CBPR experience and compensates them equitably to provide technical assistance to community-academic research partnerships. OBJECTIVES: This paper describes approaches to valuing community expertise, the importance of equitable compensation for community partners, the impact on the community partners, opportunities for institutional change, and the constraints faced in model implementation. METHODS: Community Experts (CEs) are independent contractor consultants. CEs were interviewed to evaluate their satisfaction with their engagement and compensation for their work. LESSONS LEARNED: (1) CEs have knowledge, power, and credibility to push for systems change. (2) Changes were needed within the university to facilitate successful consultation to community-academic partnerships. (3) Sustaining the CE role requires staff support, continued compensation, increased opportunities for engagement, and careful consideration of position demands. (4) The role provides benefits beyond financial compensation. (5) Opportunities to gather deepened relationships within the partnership and built collective knowledge that strengthened the project. CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging CE expertise and compensating them for their role benefits both university and community. Creating a place for community expertise within academia is an important step toward equitably including the community in research.
BACKGROUND: Community-based participatory research (CBPR) strives for equitable collaboration among community and academic partners throughout the research process. To build the capacity of academia to function as effective research partners with communities, the North Carolina Translational and Clinical Sciences Institute (NC TraCS), home of the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH)'s Clinical and Translational Sciences Award (CTSA), developed a community engagement consulting model. This new model harnesses the expertise of community partners with CBPR experience and compensates them equitably to provide technical assistance to community-academic research partnerships. OBJECTIVES: This paper describes approaches to valuing community expertise, the importance of equitable compensation for community partners, the impact on the community partners, opportunities for institutional change, and the constraints faced in model implementation. METHODS: Community Experts (CEs) are independent contractor consultants. CEs were interviewed to evaluate their satisfaction with their engagement and compensation for their work. LESSONS LEARNED: (1) CEs have knowledge, power, and credibility to push for systems change. (2) Changes were needed within the university to facilitate successful consultation to community-academic partnerships. (3) Sustaining the CE role requires staff support, continued compensation, increased opportunities for engagement, and careful consideration of position demands. (4) The role provides benefits beyond financial compensation. (5) Opportunities to gather deepened relationships within the partnership and built collective knowledge that strengthened the project. CONCLUSIONS: Leveraging CE expertise and compensating them for their role benefits both university and community. Creating a place for community expertise within academia is an important step toward equitably including the community in research.
Authors: Barbara A Israel; Edith A Parker; Zachary Rowe; Alicia Salvatore; Meredith Minkler; Jesús López; Arlene Butz; Adrian Mosley; Lucretia Coates; George Lambert; Paul A Potito; Barbara Brenner; Maribel Rivera; Harry Romero; Beti Thompson; Gloria Coronado; Sandy Halstead Journal: Environ Health Perspect Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 9.031
Authors: Taylor J Arnold; Andreina Malki; Jackeline Leyva; Jose Ibarra; Stephanie S Daniel; Parissa J Ballard; Joanne C Sandberg; Sara A Quandt; Thomas A Arcury Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2019
Authors: Christopher M Shea; Tiffany L Young; Byron J Powell; Catherine Rohweder; Zoe K Enga; Jennifer E Scott; Lori Carter-Edwards; Giselle Corbie-Smith Journal: Transl Behav Med Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 3.046
Authors: Yolene Gousse; Davin McFarlane; Marilyn Fraser; Michael Joseph; Bibi Alli; Marion Council-George; Hermione Fraser; Desmond Romeo; Nelson Urraca; Patrick Wellington; Mark Stewart; Ruth C Browne; Moro O Salifu; Peter Vavagiakis; Tracey E Wilson Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2018
Authors: Kim B Kim; Miyong T Kim; Hochang B Lee; Tam Nguyen; Lee R Bone; David Levine Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2016-03-17 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ada Bends; Charlene Burns; Pearl Yellowman-Caye; Tammy Rider; Emily Matt Salois; Annette Sutherland; Mike Todd; Deb LaVeaux; Suzanne Christopher Journal: Pimatisiwin Date: 2013
Authors: Jeannine S Skinner; Neely A Williams; Al Richmond; Jen Brown; A Hal Strelnick; Karen Calhoun; E Hill De Loney; Shauntice Allen; Alex Pirie; Consuelo H Wilkins Journal: Prog Community Health Partnersh Date: 2018