Literature DB >> 2405634

Shear bond strength of four orthodontic bonding systems.

M N Coreil1, P McInnes-Ledoux, W R Ledoux, R Weinberg.   

Abstract

Recently new orthodontic bonding systems have been developed for attachment of brackets to the etched facial surfaces of teeth. Two of these new systems use bonding agents that contain solvents. It is claimed that this improves the polymerization of the unfilled resin primer and may increase bond strength. A new light-cured restorative enamel/dentin-bonding agent has also recently been introduced. Its value in orthodontic bonding has not been determined. The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the shear bond strengths of the three new bonding systems and to compare these with a conventional orthodontic bonding system. Forty-eight enamel specimens were prepared with 600-grit silicone carbide paper, acid etched with 37% phosphoric acid, and assigned to four enamel-bonding treatment groups: (A) Saga sealant; (B) Maximum Cure; (C) Scotchbond-2; and (D) Concise enamel bond. After enamel priming, the specimens were bonded to Concise orthodontic bonding resin. The bonded specimens were thermocycled (15 degrees C to 45 degrees C) and then stored in distilled water at 37 degrees C for 7 days. Shear bond strength was tested with an Instron testing machine at a strain rate of 0.02 in/min. The mean shear bond strengths and standard deviations reported in MN/m2 were (A) 20.34 (5.37); (B) 25.33 (5.96); (C) 14.59 (5.25); and (D) 20.13 (4.98). The mean shear bond strengths for groups A, B, and D were significantly greater (p less than 0.05) than that for group C. The addition of solvents to the new orthodontic bonding systems does not appear to have a clinically significant effect. The new restorative bonding resin does not provide comparable enamel bond strengths.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2405634     DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(90)70085-Q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  5 in total

1.  CO2 laser debonding of a ceramic bracket bonded with orthodontic adhesive containing thermal expansion microcapsules.

Authors:  Ayano Saito; Yasuhiro Namura; Keitaro Isokawa; Noriyoshi Shimizu
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 3.161

2.  In-vitro study of the adhesive strengths of brackets on metals, ceramic and composite. Part 2: Bonding to porcelain and composite resin.

Authors:  P G Jost-Brinkmann; S Can; C Drost
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.938

3.  Moisture insensitive primer: A myth or truth.

Authors:  Chandresh Shukla; Rajkumar Maurya; Upendra Jain; Ankur Gupta; Jayshree Garg
Journal:  J Orthod Sci       Date:  2014-10

4.  Comparison of Bond Strength of Metal and Ceramic Brackets with or without Primer.

Authors:  Shreya Sharma; Susmita K Pandit; Rohan Das; Moumita Sinha; Rajalaxmi Sahu; Pragya Trivedi
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2022-07-13

5.  The effects of composite resin types and debonding pliers on the amount of adhesive remnants and enamel damages: a stereomicroscopic evaluation.

Authors:  Parisa Salehi; Hamidreza Pakshir; Navid Naseri; Tahereh Baherimoghaddam
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2013-12-18
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.