Literature DB >> 24055512

Vacuum-assisted wound closure versus alginate for the treatment of deep perivascular wound infections in the groin after vascular surgery.

Christina Monsen1, Christine Wann-Hansson2, Catharina Wictorsson3, Stefan Acosta3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vacuum-assisted wound closure (VAC) therapy may heal wounds faster than conventional dressings after surgical debridement of perivascular groin infections after vascular surgery.
METHODS: Patients with deep infected wounds (Szilagyi grade III) were surgically revised and left open for secondary healing, then randomized to either VAC or alginate (Sorbalgon) therapy, between February 2007 and November 2011. To test the hypothesis, it was calculated that 42 patients needed to be included (90% power, 5% level of significance). It was decided to perform an interim analysis after inclusion of 20 patients.
RESULTS: Among 66 patients undergoing groin revision, 20 patients were included in this study. Patients were randomized to VAC (n = 10) or alginate (n = 10). The two groups were comparable in patient and wound characteristics. Time to full skin epithelialization was significantly shorter in the VAC group (median, 57 days) compared with the alginate group (median, 104 days; P = .026). The number of positive wound cultures of bacteria and C-reactive protein values decreased equally in both groups between surgical revision and day 21. One femur amputation was performed in each group as a consequence of the groin infection, one patient died during the in-hospital stay in the alginate group, and none died in the VAC group.
CONCLUSIONS: VAC achieves faster healing than alginate therapy after wound debridement for deep perivascular wound infections in the groin after vascular surgery. This finding does not allow further inclusion of patients from an ethical point of view, and this study was, therefore, stopped prematurely.
Copyright © 2014 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24055512     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2013.06.073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  8 in total

1.  Prosthetic Vascular Graft Infections: Bacterial Cultures from Negative-Pressure-Wound-Therapy Foams Do Not Improve Diagnostics.

Authors:  Alexandra U Scherrer; Guido Bloemberg; Reinhard Zbinden; Annelies S Zinkernagel; Claudio Fuchs; Sandra Frauenfelder; Zoran Rancic; Dieter Mayer; Barbara Hasse
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Hospitalised patients' experiences during Negative Pressure Wound Therapy due to surgical site infection after vascular and cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Charlotte B Thorup; Mette Hougaard; Pernille F Blindum; Erik E Sørensen
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 3.315

3.  Change in granulation tissue coverage and bacteriological load using Low Cost Negative Pressure Wound Therapy in acute musculoskeletal wounds.

Authors:  Siddharth Pathak; Amit Srivastava; Aditya N Aggarwal; Manish Chadha; Bineeta Kashyap; N P Singh
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-10-27

4.  Negative pressure wound therapy in patients with wounds healing by secondary intention: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Yvonne Zens; Michael Barth; Heiner C Bucher; Katrin Dreck; Moritz Felsch; Wolfram Groß; Thomas Jaschinski; Heike Kölsch; Mandy Kromp; Inga Overesch; Stefan Sauerland; Sven Gregor
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-10

5. 

Authors:  Paula Angeleli Bueno de Camargo; Matheus Bertanha; Regina Moura; Rodrigo Gibin Jaldin; Ricardo de Alvarenga Yoshida; Rafael Elias Farres Pimenta; Jamil Victor de Oliveira Mariúba; Marcone Lima Sobreira
Journal:  J Vasc Bras       Date:  2016 Oct-Dec

6.  Negative Pressure Wound Therapy vs Conventional Wound Treatment in Subcutaneous Abdominal Wound Healing Impairment: The SAWHI Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Dörthe Seidel; Stephan Diedrich; Florian Herrle; Henryk Thielemann; Frank Marusch; Rebekka Schirren; Recca Talaulicar; Tobias Gehrig; Nadja Lehwald-Tywuschik; Matthias Glanemann; Jörg Bunse; Martin Hüttemann; Chris Braumann; Oleg Heizmann; Marc Miserez; Thomas Krönert; Stephan Gretschel; Rolf Lefering
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

7.  ALGINATE versus NPWT in the Preparation of Surgical Excisions for an STSG: ATEC Trial.

Authors:  Dominique Casanova; Pierre Guerreschi; Raphael Sinna; Nicolas Bertheuil; Cécile Philandrianos; Bérengère Chignon-Sicard; Franck Duteille; Michael Atlan; Pascal Rousseau; Gilles Chatellier; Fabien Boucher; Nathalie Pham Dang; Adeline Cambon-Binder; Audrey Michot; Isabelle Pluvy; Frédéric Seigle-Murandi; Weiguo Hu; Marc Revol
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open       Date:  2020-03-27

8.  Negative pressure wound therapy versus usual care for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention (SWHSI-2 trial): study protocol for a pragmatic, multicentre, cross surgical specialty, randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Ian Chetter; Catherine Arundel; Belen Corbacho Martin; Catherine Hewitt; Caroline Fairhurst; Kalpita Joshi; Andrew Mott; Sara Rodgers; Pedro Saramago Goncalves; David Torgerson; Jacqueline Wilkinson; Jane Blazeby; Rhiannon Macefield; Stephen Dixon; Eileen Henderson; Angela Oswald; Jo Dumville; Matthew Lee; Thomas Pinkney; Nikki Stubbs; Lyn Wilson
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.279

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.