Literature DB >> 24055476

Preliminary development of a clinical decision rule for acute aortic syndromes.

Andrew J Lovy1, Eran Bellin, Jeffrey M Levsky, David Esses, Linda B Haramati.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Patients with suspected acute aortic syndromes (AAS) often undergo computed tomography (CT) with negative results. We sought clinical and diagnostic criteria to identify low-risk patients, an initial step in developing a clinical decision rule.
METHODS: We retrospectively identified all adults presenting to our emergency department (ED) from January 1, 2006, to August 1, 2010, who underwent CT angiography for suspected AAS without prior trauma or AAS. A total of 1465 patients met inclusion criteria; a retrospective case-controlled review (ratio 1:4) was conducted. Cases were diagnosed with aortic dissection, intramural hematoma, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, or ruptured aneurysm.
RESULTS: Of the patients who underwent CT, 2.7% (40/1465) had an AAS; 2 additional cases were diagnosed after admission (ED miss rate, 5% [2/42]). Patients with AAS were significantly older than controls (66 vs 59 years; P = .008). Risk factors included abnormal chest radiograph (sensitivity, 79% [26/33]; specificity, 82% [113/137]) and acute chest pain (sensitivity, 83% [29/35]; specificity, 71% [111/157]). None of the 19 patients with resolved pain upon ED presentation had AAS. These data support a 2-step rule: first screen for ongoing pain; if present, screen for acute chest pain or an abnormal chest radiograph. This approach achieves a 54% (84/155) reduction in CT usage with a sensitivity for AAS of 96% (95% confidence interval, 89%-100%), negative predictive value of 99.8% (99.4%-100%), and a false-negative rate of 1.7% (1/84).
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate a need to safely identify patients at low risk for AAS who can forgo CT. We developed a preliminary 2-step clinical decision rule, which requires validation.
© 2013.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24055476      PMCID: PMC4275798          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.06.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Emerg Med        ISSN: 0735-6757            Impact factor:   2.469


  24 in total

1.  Quality of history taking in patients with aortic dissection.

Authors:  H S Rosman; S Patel; S Borzak; G Paone; K Retter
Journal:  Chest       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 2.  Diagnostic accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography, helical computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging for suspected thoracic aortic dissection: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Toshiya Shiga; Zen'ichiro Wajima; Christian C Apfel; Tetsuo Inoue; Yoko Ohe
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2006-07-10

3.  Thoracic aortic aneurysm and dissection: increasing prevalence and improved outcomes reported in a nationwide population-based study of more than 14,000 cases from 1987 to 2002.

Authors:  Christian Olsson; Stefan Thelin; Elisabeth Ståhle; Anders Ekbom; Fredrik Granath
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-12-04       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Ascending thoracic aneurysms are associated with decreased systemic atherosclerosis.

Authors:  Hardean Achneck; Biren Modi; Coralie Shaw; John Rizzo; Gonzalo Albornoz; Daniel Fusco; John Elefteriades
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 9.410

5.  Suspected aortic dissection and other aortic disorders: multi-detector row CT in 373 cases in the emergency setting.

Authors:  Robert G Hayter; James T Rhea; Andrew Small; Faranak S Tafazoli; Robert A Novelline
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Cost-effectiveness of intensive glycemic control, intensified hypertension control, and serum cholesterol level reduction for type 2 diabetes.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-05-15       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Radiation dose from contemporary cardiothoracic multidetector CT protocols with an anthropomorphic female phantom: implications for cancer induction.

Authors:  Lynne M Hurwitz; Robert E Reiman; Terry T Yoshizumi; Philip C Goodman; Greta Toncheva; Giao Nguyen; Carolyn Lowry
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-10-08       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  Frequency and explanation of false negative diagnosis of aortic dissection by aortography and transesophageal echocardiography.

Authors:  R C Bansal; K Chandrasekaran; K Ayala; D C Smith
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 24.094

9.  Acute aortic dissection: population-based incidence compared with degenerative aortic aneurysm rupture.

Authors:  W Darrin Clouse; John W Hallett; Hartzell V Schaff; Peter C Spittell; Charles M Rowland; Duane M Ilstrup; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.616

10.  Estimating risk of cancer associated with radiation exposure from 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography.

Authors:  Andrew J Einstein; Milena J Henzlova; Sanjay Rajagopalan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-07-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  8 in total

1.  Diagnosing acute aortic syndrome: a Canadian clinical practice guideline.

Authors:  Robert Ohle; Justin W Yan; Krishan Yadav; Alexis Cournoyer; David W Savage; Prasad Jetty; Rony Atoui; Bindu Bittira; Brock Wilson; Ashish Gupta; Niamh Coffey; Yvonne Callaway; Jeffrey Middaugh; Dominique Ansell; Fraser Rubens; Stephen J Bignucolo; Terena-Marie Scott; Sarah McIsaac; Eddy Lang
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2020-07-20       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Emergency CT misdiagnosis in acute aortic syndrome.

Authors:  John G Dreisbach; Jonathan Cl Rodrigues; Giles Roditi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 3.629

3.  Variation in CTA evaluation of ED patients suspected of aortic dissection.

Authors:  Jarren K T Takaki; Isabella Ford; Hyo-Chun Yoon
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2022-05-05

Review 4.  Chest radiography in acute aortic syndrome: pearls and pitfalls.

Authors:  Ashish Chawla; Surendran Rajendran; Wai Heng Yung; Suresh Balasubramanian Babu; Wilfred C Peh
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-06-09

5.  Recommendations for accurate CT diagnosis of suspected acute aortic syndrome (AAS)--on behalf of the British Society of Cardiovascular Imaging (BSCI)/British Society of Cardiovascular CT (BSCCT).

Authors:  Varut Vardhanabhuti; Edward Nicol; Gareth Morgan-Hughes; Carl A Roobottom; Giles Roditi; Mark C K Hamilton; Russell K Bull; Franchesca Pugliese; Michelle C Williams; James Stirrup; Simon Padley; Andrew Taylor; L Ceri Davies; Roger Bury; Stephen Harden
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 3.039

6.  Development and Validation of a Simplified Probability Assessment Score Integrated With Age-Adjusted d-Dimer for Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Syndromes.

Authors:  Fulvio Morello; Paolo Bima; Emanuele Pivetta; Marco Santoro; Elisabetta Catini; Barbara Casanova; Bernd A Leidel; Alexandre de Matos Soeiro; Thomas Nestelberger; Christian Mueller; Stefano Grifoni; Enrico Lupia; Peiman Nazerian
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-01-21       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Prospective diagnostic accuracy study of plasma soluble ST2 for diagnosis of acute aortic syndromes.

Authors:  Fulvio Morello; Alice Bartalucci; Marco Bironzo; Marco Santoro; Emanuele Pivetta; Alice Ianniello; Francesca Rumbolo; Giulio Mengozzi; Enrico Lupia
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-20       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Aortic Dissection: A Review of the Pathophysiology, Management and Prospective Advances.

Authors:  Ahmed Sayed; Malak Munir; Eshak I Bahbah
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2021
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.