| Literature DB >> 24055105 |
Kishiko Sunami1, Akira Ishii, Sakurako Takano, Hidefumi Yamamoto, Tetsushi Sakashita, Masaaki Tanaka, Yasuyoshi Watanabe, Hideo Yamane.
Abstract
In daily communication, we can usually still hear the spoken words as if they had not been masked and can comprehend the speech when spoken words are masked by background noise. This phenomenon is known as phonemic restoration. Since little is known about the neural mechanisms underlying phonemic restoration for speech comprehension, we aimed to identify the neural mechanisms using magnetoencephalography (MEG). Twelve healthy male volunteers with normal hearing participated in the study. Participants were requested to carefully listen to and understand recorded spoken Japanese stories, which were either played forward (forward condition) or in reverse (reverse condition), with their eyes closed. Several syllables of spoken words were replaced by 300-ms white-noise stimuli with an inter-stimulus interval of 1.6-20.3s. We compared MEG responses to white-noise stimuli during the forward condition with those during the reverse condition using time-frequency analyses. Increased 3-5 Hz band power in the forward condition compared with the reverse condition was continuously observed in the left inferior frontal gyrus [Brodmann's areas (BAs) 45, 46, and 47] and decreased 18-22 Hz band powers caused by white-noise stimuli were seen in the left transverse temporal gyrus (BA 42) and superior temporal gyrus (BA 22). These results suggest that the left inferior frontal gyrus and left transverse and superior temporal gyri are involved in phonemic restoration for speech comprehension. Our findings may help clarify the neural mechanisms of phonemic restoration as well as develop innovative treatment methods for individuals suffering from impaired speech comprehension, particularly in noisy environments.Entities:
Keywords: Hearing loss; Magnetoencephalography (MEG); Phonemic restoration; Speech comprehension
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24055105 DOI: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.09.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Brain Res ISSN: 0006-8993 Impact factor: 3.252