PURPOSE: To investigate radiation exposure in computed tomography (CT)-guided interventions, to establish reference levels for exposure, and to discuss strategies for dose reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 1576 consecutive CT-guided procedures in 1284 patients performed over 4.5 years, including drainage placements; biopsies of different organs; radiofrequency and microwave ablations (RFA/MWA) of liver, bone, and lung tumors; pain blockages, and vertebroplasties. Data were analyzed with respect to scanner settings, overall radiation doses, and individual doses of planning CT series, CT intervention, and control CT series. RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of the total radiation dose was applied during the pre- and post-interventional CT series, leaving only 15% applied by the CT-guided intervention itself. Single slice acquisition was associated with lower doses than continuous CT-fluoroscopy (37 mGy cm vs. 153 mGy cm, p<0.001). The third quartile of radiation doses varied considerably for different interventions. The highest doses were observed in complex interventions like RFA/MWA of the liver, followed by vertebroplasty and RFA/MWA of the lung. CONCLUSIONS: This paper suggests preliminary reference levels for various intervention types and discusses strategies for dose reduction. A multicenter registry of radiation exposure including a broader spectrum of scanners and intervention types is needed to develop definitive reference levels.
PURPOSE: To investigate radiation exposure in computed tomography (CT)-guided interventions, to establish reference levels for exposure, and to discuss strategies for dose reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 1576 consecutive CT-guided procedures in 1284 patients performed over 4.5 years, including drainage placements; biopsies of different organs; radiofrequency and microwave ablations (RFA/MWA) of liver, bone, and lung tumors; pain blockages, and vertebroplasties. Data were analyzed with respect to scanner settings, overall radiation doses, and individual doses of planning CT series, CT intervention, and control CT series. RESULTS: Eighty-five percent of the total radiation dose was applied during the pre- and post-interventional CT series, leaving only 15% applied by the CT-guided intervention itself. Single slice acquisition was associated with lower doses than continuous CT-fluoroscopy (37 mGy cm vs. 153 mGy cm, p<0.001). The third quartile of radiation doses varied considerably for different interventions. The highest doses were observed in complex interventions like RFA/MWA of the liver, followed by vertebroplasty and RFA/MWA of the lung. CONCLUSIONS: This paper suggests preliminary reference levels for various intervention types and discusses strategies for dose reduction. A multicenter registry of radiation exposure including a broader spectrum of scanners and intervention types is needed to develop definitive reference levels.
Authors: J G Alves; S Sarmento; J S Pereira; M F Pereira; M J Sousa; L Cunha; A Dias; A D Oliveira; J V Cardoso; L M Santos; J Lencart; M Gouvêa; J A M Santos Journal: Radiat Environ Biophys Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 1.925
Authors: K A Shpilberg; B N Delman; L N Tanenbaum; S J Esses; R Subramaniam; A H Doshi Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2014-07-17 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Emmanuel C Mbalisike; Thomas J Vogl; Stefan Zangos; Katrin Eichler; Prakash Balakrishnan; Jijo Paul Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2014-08-23 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Nika Guberina; Michael Forsting; Adrian Ringelstein; Saravanabavaan Suntharalingam; Kai Nassenstein; Jens Theysohn; Axel Wetter Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-03-28 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Christian E Althoff; Matthias Bollow; Eugen Feist; Stephan R Marticorena-Garcia; Iris Eshed; Torsten Diekhoff; Bernd Hamm; Kay Geert A Hermann Journal: Clin Rheumatol Date: 2015-04-22 Impact factor: 2.980
Authors: Oliver S Grosser; Christian Wybranski; Dennis Kupitz; Maciej Powerski; Konrad Mohnike; Maciej Pech; Holger Amthauer; Jens Ricke Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: L P Beyer; B Pregler; C Niessen; M Dollinger; B M Graf; M Müller; H J Schlitt; C Stroszczynski; P Wiggermann Journal: Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg Date: 2015-08-26 Impact factor: 2.924
Authors: Caroline A Burgard; Julien Dinkel; Frederik Strobl; Philipp M Paprottka; Nicolai Schramm; Maximilian Reiser; Christoph G Trumm Journal: Diagn Interv Radiol Date: 2018 May-Jun Impact factor: 2.630