Literature DB >> 24049786

Authors' response: forward models and their implications for production, comprehension, and dialogue.

Martin J Pickering1, Simon Garrod.   

Abstract

Our target article proposed that language production and comprehension are interwoven, with speakers making predictions of their own utterances and comprehenders making predictions of other people's utterances at different linguistic levels. Here, we respond to comments about such issues as cognitive architecture and its neural basis, learning and development, monitoring, the nature of forward models, communicative intentions, and dialogue.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24049786     DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x12003238

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Brain Sci        ISSN: 0140-525X            Impact factor:   12.579


  11 in total

1.  Inhibition accumulates over time at multiple processing levels in bilingual language control.

Authors:  Daniel Kleinman; Tamar H Gollan
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2018-04

2.  Syncing Up for a Good Conversation: A Clinically Meaningful Methodology for Capturing Conversational Entrainment in the Speech Domain.

Authors:  Stephanie A Borrie; Tyson S Barrett; Megan M Willi; Visar Berisha
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  The role of conflict, feedback, and action comprehension in monitoring of action errors: Evidence for internal and external routes.

Authors:  Cortney M Howard; Louisa L Smith; H Branch Coslett; Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2019-02-14       Impact factor: 4.027

4.  Single-word predictions of upcoming language during comprehension: Evidence from the cumulative semantic interference task.

Authors:  Daniel Kleinman; Elin Runnqvist; Victor S Ferreira
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2015-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  On the parity of structural persistence in language production and comprehension.

Authors:  Kristen M Tooley; Kathryn Bock
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2014-05-04

6.  Perceiving and remembering speech depend on multifractal nonlinearity in movements producing and exploring speech.

Authors:  Lauren Bloomfield; Elizabeth Lane; Madhur Mangalam; Damian G Kelty-Stephen
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2021-08-04       Impact factor: 4.293

7.  The use of content and timing to predict turn transitions.

Authors:  Simon Garrod; Martin J Pickering
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-06-11

8.  Twisting tongues to test for conflict-monitoring in speech production.

Authors:  Daniel J Acheson; Peter Hagoort
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  Towards a New Model of Verbal Monitoring.

Authors:  Hanna S Gauvin; Robert J Hartsuiker
Journal:  J Cogn       Date:  2020-09-03

10.  Multimodal Communication in Aphasia: Perception and Production of Co-speech Gestures During Face-to-Face Conversation.

Authors:  Basil C Preisig; Noëmi Eggenberger; Dario Cazzoli; Thomas Nyffeler; Klemens Gutbrod; Jean-Marie Annoni; Jurka R Meichtry; Tobias Nef; René M Müri
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.