| Literature DB >> 24049405 |
Manisha R Sharma1, Charmi S Mehta, Dipali J Shukla, Kalapi B Patel, Manish V Patel, Shiv Narayan Gupta.
Abstract
Vata is the governing factor in the maintenance of equilibrium in the universe as well as in the body. As age advances, the influence of Vata Dosha progresses, resulting in the process of gradual degeneration of the body. Sandhigatavata (osteoarthritis) is one of the consequences of this process, which is common in the elderly people. This is one of the major causes of chronic disability, affecting the quality of life. Prevalence of osteoarthritis in India is more among menopausal women. This study has been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Ayurvedic multimodal management in Sandhigatavata and to provide better options to Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs). In present clinical trial, 50 patients of Sandhigatavata have been registered and have been given Snehana, Svedana, Mriduvirechana, Matrabasti, and Jalaukavacharana, along with oral medications like Yogaraja Guggulu and Ashvagandha Churna. This multimodal therapy is being used in P.D. Patel Ayurved Hospital, Nadiad, since years, providing good relief to patients with Sandhigatavata. The results have been analyzed statistically by using the Student paired't' test. The therapy showed highly significant (P < 0.001) beneficial effect on the clinical features of Sandhigatavata. On overall effect of therapy, 4% of the patients were relieved completely, while 24% have shown marked improvement, 50% moderate improvement, and 22% mild improvement. Results of follow-up showed that marked improvement decreased, but moderate improvement was steady. Continuing the study on a larger number of patients, with inclusion of more objective parameters to get better conclusions is suggested at the end of the study.Entities:
Keywords: Matrabasti; Sandhigatavata; Snehana; Svedana; Upanaha; osteoarthritis
Year: 2013 PMID: 24049405 PMCID: PMC3764880 DOI: 10.4103/0974-8520.115447
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ayu ISSN: 0974-8520
Subjective criteria
Overall assessment of therapy
Observations
Effect of therapy on clinical features after 15 days of indoor treatment
Effect of therapy on clinical features during first follow-up
Effect of therapy on clinical features second follow-up
Effect of therapy on range of movement of knee joint after 15 days of indoor treatment
Effect of therapy on range of movement of knee joint during first follow-up
Effect of therapy on range of movement of the knee joint during second follow-up
Figure 1Comparison of mean scores in clinical features (knee joint osteoarthritis)
Figure 2Comparison of percentage improvement in clinical features (knee joint osteoarthritis)
Figure 3Comparison of mean scores in degree of range of movement of knee joint osteoarthritis
Figure 4Comparison of percentage improvement in degree of range of movement of knee joint osteoarthritis
Figure 5Overall effect of therapy