CONTEXT: The neurobiological effect of yoga on the cortical structures in the elderly is as yet unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven healthy elderly subjects received yoga intervention as an add-on life-style practice. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained before and 6 months later. Voxel-based-morphometric analyses compared the brains before and after the yoga. RESULTS: Yoga group was found to have increases in hippocampal, but not in occipital gray matter. CONCLUSION: Yoga has potential to reduce neuro-senescence. Small sample size and absence of the control group prevent generalization of the findings limiting its translational value.
CONTEXT: The neurobiological effect of yoga on the cortical structures in the elderly is as yet unknown. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seven healthy elderly subjects received yoga intervention as an add-on life-style practice. Magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained before and 6 months later. Voxel-based-morphometric analyses compared the brains before and after the yoga. RESULTS: Yoga group was found to have increases in hippocampal, but not in occipital gray matter. CONCLUSION: Yoga has potential to reduce neuro-senescence. Small sample size and absence of the control group prevent generalization of the findings limiting its translational value.
Entities:
Keywords:
Elderly; hippocampus; magnetic resonance imaging; yoga
Hippocampus is the vulnerable structure for loss of grey matter with aging.[1] Volume reductions in the hippocampus are the earliest indicators of Alzheimer's dementia (AD).[2] Exercise has neuroprotective effects in patients with dementia.[3] Exercise increases regional blood flow and helps enhance neuronal connectivity to hippocampus.[4] Contextually, it is interesting to note that aerobic exercise has been shown to increase hippocampal grey matter volume.[5] Among the life-style practices as alternative to exercise, yoga is practiced in the east and in many western populations. Yoga comprises of various domains of practices such as physical postures, regulated breathing, meditation and several other related techniques. One study found that gray matter volumes were higher in those who were practicing hatha yoga and meditation for a long time as compared with controls not practicing yoga.[6] There is some evidence that meditation alone too provides neuroprotective effects by the way of increasing cortical thickness and that older people have advantage in getting this benefit of meditation.[78] We found elevations in serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), a neuroprotective chemical, after 3-month Yogāsana and Prāṇāyāma therapy in adults with depression.[9] BDNF is highly expressed in the hippocampus.[10] Hence, it is possible that yoga practice might result in changes in the hippocampus. In this study, the effect of yoga practice on hippocampus volume is examined in healthy elderly subjects.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Subjects and yoga procedure
The sample for this study comes from a larger randomized controlled trial comparing cognitive and other effects of yoga and wait-listing in the elderly. Seven consenting healthy elderly (age range 69-81 years; 4 males) living in old age homes who participated in this magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study before and after 6 months of yoga formed the sample. The National Institute of Mental Health and Neuroscience Ethics Committee approved this study. All subjects were clinically screened for AD, depression and cerebrovascular disease using appropriate instruments and a detailed clinical examination. They were also screened for any contraindications for MRI or yoga. None used alcohol or any other drugs of abuse that could potentially affect brain function or structure. They were not on any psychotropic medication.The yoga module was prepared and validated[11] specifically to provide benefits against age-related cognitive loss. The practices included Yogāsanas (e.g., Bhujaṅgāsana,, Paścimottānāsana etc.), Prāṇāyāma (e.g., Naḍiśuddhi, Bhastrikā etc.) and OM chanting [Reference 11 published in this issue has more details of the yoga practices used in this module]. These were taught 5 days a week for 3 months by a researcher formally trained in yoga. After the 3 months of training, the subjects received a manual describing these practices. The subjects were to continue the same with its help on a daily basis. They received “booster” training sessions at monthly intervals and on any other day if the participants requested. Each day's session would last about an hour.
MRI acquisition
MRI was performed with 3.0 Tesla Scanner. T1 weighted three-dimensional magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo sequence was performed (time repetition=8.1 ms, time echo=3.7 ms, nutation angle=8°, field of view=256 mm, slice thickness=1 mm without interslice gap, NEX=1, matrix=256 × 256). MRI was obtained before and after the 6-month yoga intervention.
Image processing and analysis
Voxel based morphometry analysis was performed using Statistical Parametric Mapping (SPM8) (http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm) and MATLAB 7.8 (Math-Works, Natick, MA, USA). MRI images were initially segmented into gray matter (GM), white matter and cerebrospinal fluid using the standard unified segmentation model in SPM8.[7] GM population templates were then generated from the entire image dataset using the Diffeomorphic Anatomical Registration Using Exponentiated Lie Algebra (DARTEL) technique.[12] Then, after an initial affine registration of the GM DARTEL templates to the tissue probability maps in Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) space (http://www.mni.mcgill.ca/), non-linear warping of GM images was performed to the DARTEL GM template in MNI space. Next, images were modulated to ensure that relative volumes of GM were preserved following the spatial normalization procedure. Lastly, images were smoothed with an 8 mm full width at half maximum Gaussian kernel. After spatial pre-processing, the smoothed, modulated and normalized GM datasets were used for statistical analysis. The masks for the region of interests (ROIs) (hippocampus as the apriori ROI and superior occipital gyrus as the control brain region) were constructed using Wake Forest University Pick Atlas (version 3.0.4).[1314] Paired sample t-test within the SPM interface was performed to assess the impact of yoga practice on hippocampus. Superior occipital gyrus was chosen as the control brain region. Given the focused hypothesis on specific apriori regions, significance was set at uncorrected P<0.05.
RESULTS
All participants completed the 6-month yoga intervention. They spontaneously reported no adverse event. Effect on hippocampus volume paired sample t-test of GM images with apriori ROI of hippocampus revealed a significant increase in bilateral hippocampus volume (posterior region) following 6 months of yoga in elderly subjects (N=7) (left hippocampus: X = −33, Y=−30, Z=−11; T=2.9; uncorrected P=0.01; right hippocampus: X =32, Y=−22, Z=−18; T=2.3; uncorrected P=0.03) [Figure 1]. No change in volume was observed in the control brain region (superior occipital gyrus).
Figure 1
Voxel based morphometric analysis of the effects of yoga practice in healthy elderly (demonstrates significant increase in bilateral hippocampus gray matter volume after 6 months of yoga practice [indicated by the yellow circle])
Voxel based morphometric analysis of the effects of yoga practice in healthy elderly (demonstrates significant increase in bilateral hippocampus gray matter volume after 6 months of yoga practice [indicated by the yellow circle])
DISCUSSION
In this study, 6 months of yoga practice was associated with the increase in volume of bilateral hippocampus; however, this finding has to be considered preliminary and has to be interpreted with caution in the context of following critical limitations: (1) Small sample size (N=7); (2) absence of a control group scanned twice at an interval of 6 months; (3) we did not perform multiple comparison correction; (4) lack of concurrent assessment of certain related neurobiological parameters like BDNF.It is known that in healthy aging too, the elderly obtain a 1-2% loss in hippocampus volume annually.[1] In contrast, after 6 months of yoga intervention, the hippocampus gained volume in this study. Such change did not occur in occipital cortex. Hippocampus and occipital cortices were chosen as the target and control regions due to their differential susceptibility to neuro-senescence; with the occipital cortex being the least affected in the age-related brain atrophy.[15] This neuroplastic effect in the hippocampus is in keeping with similar reports in the literature; aerobic exercise[5] and meditations[7] too produced increases in the volume of the hippocampus. Demonstrating this differential effect of an intervention using a control group as done in an earlier study[16] would have been more convincing. A behavioral/functional correlate to the observed neuroplastic effect too was desirable. In this small sample of seven subjects, such correlation was not attempted. Similarly, correlation with other neuroplasticity measures could strengthen the finding.In summary, 6 months of practice of yoga obtained greater hippocampal, but not occipital cortex volumes in non-demented elderly. Yoga has the potential to be a barrier to age-related neuro-senescence. The findings merit confirmation in the larger sample, as well as with a control intervention and/or aerobic exercise. Given the cultural acceptance of yoga, this should be exploited as a public health intervention to fight neuro-senescence and diseases including AD.
Authors: Britta K Hölzel; James Carmody; Mark Vangel; Christina Congleton; Sita M Yerramsetti; Tim Gard; Sara W Lazar Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2010-11-10 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Sara W Lazar; Catherine E Kerr; Rachel H Wasserman; Jeremy R Gray; Douglas N Greve; Michael T Treadway; Metta McGarvey; Brian T Quinn; Jeffery A Dusek; Herbert Benson; Scott L Rauch; Christopher I Moore; Bruce Fischl Journal: Neuroreport Date: 2005-11-28 Impact factor: 1.837
Authors: Lukas Pezawas; Beth A Verchinski; Venkata S Mattay; Joseph H Callicott; Bhaskar S Kolachana; Richard E Straub; Michael F Egan; Andreas Meyer-Lindenberg; Daniel R Weinberger Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2004-11-10 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: V R Hariprasad; S Varambally; P T Varambally; J Thirthalli; I V Basavaraddi; B N Gangadhar Journal: Indian J Psychiatry Date: 2013-07 Impact factor: 1.759
Authors: Sarah L Aghjayan; Alina Lesnovskaya; Irene Esteban-Cornejo; Jamie C Peven; Chelsea M Stillman; Kirk I Erickson Journal: Hippocampus Date: 2021-06-08 Impact factor: 3.753