Argonde C van Harten1, Lieke L Smits, Charlotte E Teunissen, Pieter J Visser, Teddy Koene, Marinus A Blankenstein, Philip Scheltens, Wiesje M van der Flier. 1. From the Alzheimer Center (A.C.v.H., L.L.S., P.J.V., T.K., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Neurology (A.C.v.H., L.L.S., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Neuroscience Campus Amsterdam (A.C.v.H., L.L.S., C.E.T., P.J.V., P.S., W.M.v.d.F.), Department of Clinical Chemistry (C.E.T., M.A.B.), Department of Medical Psychology (T.K.), and Department of Epidemiology/Biostatistics (W.M.v.d.F.), VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam; and the Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology/Alzheimer Center Limburg (P.J.V.), School for Mental Health and Neurosciences, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, the Netherlands.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We assessed whether preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD) based on CSF biomarkers at baseline predicts decline in cognitive functioning as measured by repeated neuropsychological tests for 4 cognitive domains in patients with subjective complaints. METHODS: We included 132 patients with subjective complaints from our memory clinic-based Amsterdam Dementia Cohort, who underwent lumbar puncture and had repeated (range 2-7) neuropsychological evaluations. Follow-up was 2 ± 1 years. CSF biomarkers amyloid-β (Aβ42), total tau (Tau), and hyperphosphorylated tau-181 were used to define National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) preclinical AD stages. Predictive value of preclinical AD stages as defined by CSF biomarkers, individual biomarkers, and Aβ42/tau ratio was assessed using linear mixed models. Outcome measures were compound z scores for memory, attention, executive functioning, language, and global cognition. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and education. RESULTS: Patients were 61 ± 8 years old; 56 (42%) were women. Average baseline Mini-Mental State Examination score was 28.3 ± 1.5. Patients who fulfilled criteria for preclinical AD (stage 1: n = 11 + stage 2: n = 10) showed decline over time in memory (β ± SE -0.41 ± 0.14, p < 0.01), executive functions (-0.21 ± 0.08, p < 0.01), and global cognition (-0.29 ± 0.10, p < 0.01). There were no differences in cognitive decline between NIA-AA preclinical AD stages 1 and 2. In patients with normal CSF biomarkers, we observed memory improvement (0.19 ± 0.07, p < 0.01) and stable performance in all other domains. CONCLUSIONS: CSF evidence of preclinical AD in patients with subjective complaints predicted cognitive decline over time, encompassing more than memory alone. Executive functioning and global cognitive functioning also deteriorated. On the other hand, 2-year prognosis for patients without evidence of AD pathophysiology was good.
OBJECTIVE: We assessed whether preclinical Alzheimer disease (AD) based on CSF biomarkers at baseline predicts decline in cognitive functioning as measured by repeated neuropsychological tests for 4 cognitive domains in patients with subjective complaints. METHODS: We included 132 patients with subjective complaints from our memory clinic-based Amsterdam Dementia Cohort, who underwent lumbar puncture and had repeated (range 2-7) neuropsychological evaluations. Follow-up was 2 ± 1 years. CSF biomarkers amyloid-β (Aβ42), total tau (Tau), and hyperphosphorylated tau-181 were used to define National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer's Association (NIA-AA) preclinical AD stages. Predictive value of preclinical AD stages as defined by CSF biomarkers, individual biomarkers, and Aβ42/tau ratio was assessed using linear mixed models. Outcome measures were compound z scores for memory, attention, executive functioning, language, and global cognition. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, and education. RESULTS:Patients were 61 ± 8 years old; 56 (42%) were women. Average baseline Mini-Mental State Examination score was 28.3 ± 1.5. Patients who fulfilled criteria for preclinical AD (stage 1: n = 11 + stage 2: n = 10) showed decline over time in memory (β ± SE -0.41 ± 0.14, p < 0.01), executive functions (-0.21 ± 0.08, p < 0.01), and global cognition (-0.29 ± 0.10, p < 0.01). There were no differences in cognitive decline between NIA-AA preclinical AD stages 1 and 2. In patients with normal CSF biomarkers, we observed memory improvement (0.19 ± 0.07, p < 0.01) and stable performance in all other domains. CONCLUSIONS: CSF evidence of preclinical AD in patients with subjective complaints predicted cognitive decline over time, encompassing more than memory alone. Executive functioning and global cognitive functioning also deteriorated. On the other hand, 2-year prognosis for patients without evidence of AD pathophysiology was good.
Authors: Clifford R Jack; David S Knopman; Gaël Chételat; Dennis Dickson; Anne M Fagan; Giovanni B Frisoni; William Jagust; Elizabeth C Mormino; Ronald C Petersen; Reisa A Sperling; Wiesje M van der Flier; Victor L Villemagne; Pieter J Visser; Stephanie J B Vos Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2016-01-18 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Beth E Snitz; Oscar L Lopez; Eric McDade; James T Becker; Ann D Cohen; Julie C Price; Chester A Mathis; William E Klunk Journal: J Alzheimers Dis Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 4.472
Authors: Rebecca E Amariglio; Elizabeth C Mormino; Alison C Pietras; Gad A Marshall; Patrizia Vannini; Keith A Johnson; Reisa A Sperling; Dorene M Rentz Journal: Neurology Date: 2015-06-05 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Alberto J Espay; Joaquin A Vizcarra; Luca Marsili; Anthony E Lang; David K Simon; Aristide Merola; Keith A Josephs; Alfonso Fasano; Francesca Morgante; Rodolfo Savica; J Timothy Greenamyre; Franca Cambi; Tritia R Yamasaki; Caroline M Tanner; Ziv Gan-Or; Irene Litvan; Ignacio F Mata; Cyrus P Zabetian; Patrik Brundin; Hubert H Fernandez; David G Standaert; Marcelo A Kauffman; Michael A Schwarzschild; S Pablo Sardi; Todd Sherer; George Perry; James B Leverenz Journal: Neurology Date: 2019-02-12 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Yujing Zhao; Dana L Tudorascu; Oscar L Lopez; Ann D Cohen; Chester A Mathis; Howard J Aizenstein; Julie C Price; Lewis H Kuller; M Ilyas Kamboh; Steven T DeKosky; William E Klunk; Beth E Snitz Journal: JAMA Neurol Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 18.302
Authors: David S Knopman; Clifford R Jack; Emily S Lundt; Stephen D Weigand; Prashanthi Vemuri; Val J Lowe; Kejal Kantarci; Jeffrey L Gunter; Matthew L Senjem; Michelle M Mielke; Mary M Machulda; Rosebud O Roberts; Bradley F Boeve; David T Jones; Ronald C Petersen Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2016-06-16 Impact factor: 4.673