Literature DB >> 24048353

Assessing the validity and reproducibility of genome-scale predictions.

Lauren A Sugden1, Michael R Tackett, Yiannis A Savva, William A Thompson, Charles E Lawrence.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Validation and reproducibility of results is a central and pressing issue in genomics. Several recent embarrassing incidents involving the irreproducibility of high-profile studies have illustrated the importance of this issue and the need for rigorous methods for the assessment of reproducibility.
RESULTS: Here, we describe an existing statistical model that is very well suited to this problem. We explain its utility for assessing the reproducibility of validation experiments, and apply it to a genome-scale study of adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR)-mediated RNA editing in Drosophila. We also introduce a statistical method for planning validation experiments that will obtain the tightest reproducibility confidence limits, which, for a fixed total number of experiments, returns the optimal number of replicates for the study. AVAILABILITY: Downloadable software and a web service for both the analysis of data from a reproducibility study and for the optimal design of these studies is provided at http://ccmbweb.ccv.brown.edu/reproducibility.html .

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24048353      PMCID: PMC3810853          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt508

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


  58 in total

1.  Methods for assessing reproducibility of clustering patterns observed in analyses of microarray data.

Authors:  Lisa M McShane; Michael D Radmacher; Boris Freidlin; Ren Yu; Ming-Chung Li; Richard Simon
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Differential expression in SAGE: accounting for normal between-library variation.

Authors:  Keith A Baggerly; Li Deng; Jeffrey S Morris; C Marcelo Aldaz
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-08-12       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Calculation of the minimum number of replicate spots required for detection of significant gene expression fold change in microarray experiments.

Authors:  Michael A Black; R W Doerge
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Genome-wide analysis of A-to-I RNA editing by single-molecule sequencing in Drosophila.

Authors:  Georges St Laurent; Michael R Tackett; Sergey Nechkin; Dmitry Shtokalo; Denis Antonets; Yiannis A Savva; Rachel Maloney; Philipp Kapranov; Charles E Lawrence; Robert A Reenan
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2013-09-29       Impact factor: 15.369

5.  An unwinding activity that covalently modifies its double-stranded RNA substrate.

Authors:  B L Bass; H Weintraub
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1988-12-23       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  A-to-I pre-mRNA editing in Drosophila is primarily involved in adult nervous system function and integrity.

Authors:  M J Palladino; L P Keegan; M A O'Connell; R A Reenan
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2000-08-18       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  Nervous system targets of RNA editing identified by comparative genomics.

Authors:  Barry Hoopengardner; Tarun Bhalla; Cynthia Staber; Robert Reenan
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Substrate specificity of the dsRNA unwinding/modifying activity.

Authors:  K Nishikura; C Yoo; U Kim; J M Murray; P A Estes; F E Cash; S A Liebhaber
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 11.598

9.  How many replicates of arrays are required to detect gene expression changes in microarray experiments? A mixture model approach.

Authors:  Wei Pan; Jizhen Lin; Chap T Le
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2002-04-22       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  Bayesian model accounting for within-class biological variability in Serial Analysis of Gene Expression (SAGE).

Authors:  Ricardo Z N Vêncio; Helena Brentani; Diogo F C Patrão; Carlos A B Pereira
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 3.169

View more
  1 in total

1.  Understanding experiments and research practices for reproducibility: an exploratory study.

Authors:  Sheeba Samuel; Birgitta König-Ries
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 2.984

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.