Literature DB >> 24047378

Recurrent processing enhances visual awareness but is not necessary for fast categorization of natural scenes.

Mika Koivisto1, Granit Kastrati, Antti Revonsuo.   

Abstract

Humans are rapid in categorizing natural scenes. Electrophysiological recordings reveal that scenes containing animals can be categorized within 150 msec, which has been interpreted to indicate that feedforward flow of information from V1 to higher visual areas is sufficient for visual categorization. However, recent studies suggest that recurrent interactions between higher and lower levels in the visual hierarchy may also be involved in categorization. To clarify the role of recurrent processing in scene categorization, we recorded EEG and manipulated recurrent processing with object substitution masking while the participants performed a go/no-go animal/nonanimal categorization task. The quality of visual awareness was measured with a perceptual awareness scale after each trial. Masking reduced the clarity of perceptual awareness, slowed down categorization speed for scenes that were not clearly perceived, and reduced the electrophysiological difference elicited by animal and nonanimal scenes after 150 msec. The results imply that recurrent processes enhance the resolution of conscious representations and thus support categorization of stimuli that are difficult to categorize on the basis of the coarse feedforward representations alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24047378     DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_00486

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  8 in total

Review 1.  Neural correlates of consciousness: progress and problems.

Authors:  Christof Koch; Marcello Massimini; Melanie Boly; Giulio Tononi
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Revealing a competitive dynamic in rapid categorization with object substitution masking.

Authors:  Jason K Chow; Thomas J Palmeri; Michael L Mack
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  On the necessity of recurrent processing during object recognition: it depends on the need for scene segmentation.

Authors:  Noor Seijdel; Jessica Loke; Ron van de Klundert; Matthew van der Meer; Eva Quispel; Simon van Gaal; Edward H F de Haan; H Steven Scholte
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Probing feedforward and feedback contributions to awareness with visual masking and transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Evelina Tapia; Diane M Beck
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-10-21

5.  Differential Visual Processing of Animal Images, with and without Conscious Awareness.

Authors:  Weina Zhu; Jan Drewes; Nicholas A Peatfield; David Melcher
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 3.169

6.  Dense sampling reveals behavioral oscillations in rapid visual categorization.

Authors:  Jan Drewes; Weina Zhu; Andreas Wutz; David Melcher
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Early Local Activity in Temporal Areas Reflects Graded Content of Visual Perception.

Authors:  Chiara F Tagliabue; Chiara Mazzi; Chiara Bagattini; Silvia Savazzi
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-04-25

8.  Scene complexity modulates degree of feedback activity during object detection in natural scenes.

Authors:  Iris I A Groen; Sara Jahfari; Noor Seijdel; Sennay Ghebreab; Victor A F Lamme; H Steven Scholte
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-12-31       Impact factor: 4.475

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.