RATIONALE: The current management of lymphoma requires accurate diagnosis and subtyping of de novo lymphoma and of relapsed or refractory lymphoma in known cases. The role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in the clinical management of lymphomas is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the use of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of de novo and relapsed mediastinal lymphomas. METHODS: A total of 2,256 consecutive patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA in a tertiary center between February 2008 and April 2013 were prospectively evaluated. The diagnostic accuracy and clinical use of EBUS-TBNA in 100 cases of de novo or suspected relapsed mediastinal lymphoma was investigated by comparing EBUS-TBNA diagnosis with the final diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: De novo mediastinal lymphoma was correctly diagnosed by EBUS-TBNA in 45 (88%) of 51 and relapsed lymphoma in 15 (100%) of 15 lymphoma cases. EBUS-TBNA accurately established a diagnosis other than lymphoma in 32 (97%) of 33 patients with suspected lymphoma relapse. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphoma were 89%, 97%, 98%, 83%, and 91%, respectively. Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA in subtyping lymphomas into high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma, low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma was 90%, 100%, and 79%, respectively. EBUS-TBNA diagnosis was adequate for clinical management in 84 (84%) of 100 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodality evaluation of EBUS-TBNA can be successful in the diagnosis of de novo mediastinal lymphomas and is ideally suited in distinguishing lymphoma relapse from alternative pathologies; it is least sensitive in subtyping Hodgkin lymphoma.
RATIONALE: The current management of lymphoma requires accurate diagnosis and subtyping of de novo lymphoma and of relapsed or refractory lymphoma in known cases. The role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) in the clinical management of lymphomas is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the use of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of de novo and relapsed mediastinal lymphomas. METHODS: A total of 2,256 consecutive patients who underwent EBUS-TBNA in a tertiary center between February 2008 and April 2013 were prospectively evaluated. The diagnostic accuracy and clinical use of EBUS-TBNA in 100 cases of de novo or suspected relapsed mediastinal lymphoma was investigated by comparing EBUS-TBNA diagnosis with the final diagnosis. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: De novo mediastinal lymphoma was correctly diagnosed by EBUS-TBNA in 45 (88%) of 51 and relapsed lymphoma in 15 (100%) of 15 lymphoma cases. EBUS-TBNA accurately established a diagnosis other than lymphoma in 32 (97%) of 33 patients with suspected lymphoma relapse. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of EBUS-TBNA in the diagnosis of mediastinal lymphoma were 89%, 97%, 98%, 83%, and 91%, respectively. Sensitivity of EBUS-TBNA in subtyping lymphomas into high-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma, low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and Hodgkin lymphoma was 90%, 100%, and 79%, respectively. EBUS-TBNA diagnosis was adequate for clinical management in 84 (84%) of 100 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodality evaluation of EBUS-TBNA can be successful in the diagnosis of de novo mediastinal lymphomas and is ideally suited in distinguishing lymphoma relapse from alternative pathologies; it is least sensitive in subtyping Hodgkin lymphoma.
Authors: Kazuhiro Yasufuku; Andrew Pierre; Gail Darling; Marc de Perrot; Thomas Waddell; Michael Johnston; Gilda da Cunha Santos; William Geddie; Scott Boerner; Lisa W Le; Shaf Keshavjee Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2011-10-02 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Paul N Meyer; Kai Fu; Timothy C Greiner; Lynette M Smith; Jan Delabie; Randy D Gascoyne; German Ott; Andreas Rosenwald; Rita M Braziel; Elias Campo; Julie M Vose; Georg Lenz; Louis M Staudt; Wing C Chan; Dennis D Weisenburger Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-12-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Neal Navani; James M Brown; Matthew Nankivell; Ian Woolhouse; Richard N Harrison; Vandana Jeebun; Mohammed Munavvar; Benjamin J Ng; Doris M Rassl; Mary Falzon; Gabrijela Kocjan; Robert C Rintoul; Andrew G Nicholson; Sam M Janes Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-04-13 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Neal Navani; David R Lawrence; Shyam Kolvekar; Martin Hayward; Dorcas McAsey; Gabrijela Kocjan; Mary Falzon; Arrigo Capitanio; Penny Shaw; Stephen Morris; Rumana Z Omar; Sam M Janes Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2012-05-31 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: George Santis; Roger Angell; Guillermina Nickless; Alison Quinn; Amanda Herbert; Paul Cane; James Spicer; Ronan Breen; Emma McLean; Khalid Tobal Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-09-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Christoph Frank Dietrich; Jouke Tabe Annema; Paul Clementsen; Xin Wu Cui; Mathias Maximilian Borst; Christian Jenssen Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Christian Jenssen; Jouke Tabe Annema; Paul Clementsen; Xin-Wu Cui; Mathias Maximilian Borst; Christoph Frank Dietrich Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 2.895