OBJECTIVES: There is currently no widely available, minimally invasive first-level examination that allows physicians to identify soft-tissue lesions that are likely to be malignant. The aim of this pilot study was to explore the potential suitability of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) for this purpose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 23 patients were referred to the Veneto Oncological Institute for work-up of superficial soft-tissue lesions. Fourteen lesions were examined with CEUS and enhancement kinetics was analyzed. Subsequently, all lesions were surgically removed and subjected to histological analysis. RESULTS: The 14 lesions included in the study were histologically classified as malignant (n = 7) or benign (n = 7, including 3 schwannomas). A statistically significant difference between benign and malignant lesions was found in terms of mean times to peak enhancement intensity (p = 0.03) but not mean filling times (FT). When schwannomas were analyzed as a separate group, their mean FT was found to be significantly different from that of the other benign lesions (p = 0.001) and from that of the group comprising other benign lesions as well as malignant lesions (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: CEUS with analysis of contrast-enhancement kinetics is a relatively low-cost, minimally invasive imaging technique, which appears to be a potentially effective first-level method for identifying suspicious soft-tissue masses.
OBJECTIVES: There is currently no widely available, minimally invasive first-level examination that allows physicians to identify soft-tissue lesions that are likely to be malignant. The aim of this pilot study was to explore the potential suitability of dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) for this purpose. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 23 patients were referred to the Veneto Oncological Institute for work-up of superficial soft-tissue lesions. Fourteen lesions were examined with CEUS and enhancement kinetics was analyzed. Subsequently, all lesions were surgically removed and subjected to histological analysis. RESULTS: The 14 lesions included in the study were histologically classified as malignant (n = 7) or benign (n = 7, including 3 schwannomas). A statistically significant difference between benign and malignant lesions was found in terms of mean times to peak enhancement intensity (p = 0.03) but not mean filling times (FT). When schwannomas were analyzed as a separate group, their mean FT was found to be significantly different from that of the other benign lesions (p = 0.001) and from that of the group comprising other benign lesions as well as malignant lesions (p < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: CEUS with analysis of contrast-enhancement kinetics is a relatively low-cost, minimally invasive imaging technique, which appears to be a potentially effective first-level method for identifying suspicious soft-tissue masses.
Authors: Gerd Bodner; Michael F H Schocke; Franz Rachbauer; Klaus Seppi; Siegfried Peer; Anke Fierlinger; Tarek Sununu; Werner R Jaschke Journal: Radiology Date: 2002-05 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Steven P Daniels; Lori Mankowski Gettle; Donna G Blankenbaker; Kenneth S Lee; Andrew B Ross Journal: Skeletal Radiol Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 2.199
Authors: Alessandro Coran; Antonio Di Maggio; Marco Rastrelli; Enrico Alberioli; Shady Attar; Paolo Ortolan; Carlo Bortolanza; Annalisa Tosi; Maria Cristina Montesco; Elisabetta Bezzon; Carlo Riccardo Rossi; Roberto Stramare Journal: J Ultrasound Date: 2015-02-15