Literature DB >> 24046579

trans-Diamminedichloridobis(1H-imidazole-κN (3))nickel(II).

Piskala Subburaman Kannan1, Ayyakannu Sundaram Ganeshraja, Kanniah Rajkumar, Krishnamoorthy Anbalagan, Arunachalatheva Subbiahpandi.   

Abstract

The whole mol-ecule of the title compound, [NiCl2(C3H4N2)2(NH3)2], is generated by inversion symmetry. The Ni(II) ion, which is located on an inversion center, has a distorted octa-hedral coordination environment and is surrounded by two ammine N atoms and two Cl atoms in the equatorial plane, with two N atoms of two imidazole groups occupying the axial positions. The imidazole ring makes a dihedral angle of 81.78 (18)° with the Ni/N/Cl equatorial plane. In the crystal, mol-ecules are linked via N-H⋯Cl hydrogen bonds and C-H⋯π inter-actions, forming a three-dimensional network.

Entities:  

Year:  2013        PMID: 24046579      PMCID: PMC3772436          DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813016747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online        ISSN: 1600-5368


Related literature

For applications of imidazole and its derivatives, see: Huang et al. (2008 ▶, 2011 ▶). For the biological activity of imidazole deriv­atives, see: Gaonkar et al. (2009 ▶).

Experimental

Crystal data

[NiCl2(C3H4N2)2(NH3)2] M = 299.82 Orthorhombic, a = 9.1349 (9) Å b = 7.9451 (5) Å c = 15.6121 (13) Å V = 1133.09 (16) Å3 Z = 4 Mo Kα radiation μ = 2.16 mm−1 T = 293 K 0.5 × 0.4 × 0.4 mm

Data collection

Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Eos diffractometer Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▶) T min = 0.369, T max = 0.421 4464 measured reflections 1338 independent reflections 1137 reflections with I > 2σ(I) R int = 0.017

Refinement

R[F 2 > 2σ(F 2)] = 0.045 wR(F 2) = 0.129 S = 1.11 1338 reflections 71 parameters H-atom parameters constrained Δρmax = 0.76 e Å−3 Δρmin = −1.00 e Å−3 Data collection: CrysAlis CCD (Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▶); cell refinement: CrysAlis CCD; data reduction: CrysAlis RED (Oxford Diffraction, 2009 ▶); program(s) used to solve structure: SHELXS97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); program(s) used to refine structure: SHELXL97 (Sheldrick, 2008 ▶); molecular graphics: ORTEP-3 for Windows (Farrugia, 2012 ▶) and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶); software used to prepare material for publication: SHELXL97 and PLATON (Spek, 2009 ▶). Crystal structure: contains datablock(s) global, I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813016747/su2612sup1.cif Structure factors: contains datablock(s) I. DOI: 10.1107/S1600536813016747/su2612Isup2.hkl Additional supplementary materials: crystallographic information; 3D view; checkCIF report
[NiCl2(C3H4N2)2(NH3)2]F(000) = 616
Mr = 299.82Dx = 1.758 Mg m3
Orthorhombic, PbcaMo Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å
Hall symbol: -P 2ac 2abCell parameters from 1338 reflections
a = 9.1349 (9) Åθ = 5.2–29.1°
b = 7.9451 (5) ŵ = 2.16 mm1
c = 15.6121 (13) ÅT = 293 K
V = 1133.09 (16) Å3Block, green
Z = 40.5 × 0.4 × 0.4 mm
Oxford Diffraction Xcalibur Eos diffractometer1338 independent reflections
Radiation source: fine-focus sealed tube1137 reflections with I > 2σ(I)
Graphite monochromatorRint = 0.017
Detector resolution: 15.9821 pixels mm-1θmax = 29.1°, θmin = 5.2°
ω and φ scanh = −8→12
Absorption correction: multi-scan (CrysAlis PRO; Oxford Diffraction, 2009)k = −10→10
Tmin = 0.369, Tmax = 0.421l = −21→15
4464 measured reflections
Refinement on F2Primary atom site location: structure-invariant direct methods
Least-squares matrix: fullSecondary atom site location: difference Fourier map
R[F2 > 2σ(F2)] = 0.045Hydrogen site location: inferred from neighbouring sites
wR(F2) = 0.129H-atom parameters constrained
S = 1.11w = 1/[σ2(Fo2) + (0.0565P)2 + 3.9561P] where P = (Fo2 + 2Fc2)/3
1338 reflections(Δ/σ)max < 0.001
71 parametersΔρmax = 0.76 e Å3
0 restraintsΔρmin = −1.00 e Å3
Geometry. All esds (except the esd in the dihedral angle between two l.s. planes) are estimated using the full covariance matrix. The cell esds are taken into account individually in the estimation of esds in distances, angles and torsion angles; correlations between esds in cell parameters are only used when they are defined by crystal symmetry. An approximate (isotropic) treatment of cell esds is used for estimating esds involving l.s. planes.
Refinement. Refinement of F2 against ALL reflections. The weighted R-factor wR and goodness of fit S are based on F2, conventional R-factors R are based on F, with F set to zero for negative F2. The threshold expression of F2 > 2sigma(F2) is used only for calculating R-factors(gt) etc. and is not relevant to the choice of reflections for refinement. R-factors based on F2 are statistically about twice as large as those based on F, and R- factors based on ALL data will be even larger.
xyzUiso*/Ueq
C40.1725 (5)0.0044 (5)0.3343 (3)0.0331 (9)
H40.2329−0.08240.35300.040*
C60.0749 (5)0.1968 (6)0.2518 (3)0.0369 (9)
H60.05390.26590.20530.044*
C70.0103 (4)0.1991 (5)0.3298 (2)0.0288 (8)
H7−0.06430.27200.34620.035*
Cl2−0.25211 (9)−0.00290 (10)0.44598 (5)0.0227 (2)
N30.0715 (3)0.0774 (4)0.38102 (17)0.0209 (6)
N50.1766 (4)0.0725 (5)0.2555 (2)0.0372 (8)
H50.23380.04250.21450.045*
N8−0.0253 (3)0.2503 (3)0.53954 (16)0.0128 (5)
H8A−0.09890.29730.51090.015*
H8B0.05680.30700.52920.015*
H8C−0.04460.25300.59540.015*
Ni10.00000.00000.50000.0150 (2)
U11U22U33U12U13U23
C40.031 (2)0.041 (2)0.0275 (19)0.0049 (16)0.0083 (16)0.0018 (15)
C60.040 (2)0.050 (2)0.0203 (16)−0.0078 (19)0.0006 (16)0.0116 (18)
C70.0277 (19)0.035 (2)0.0233 (17)0.0025 (15)0.0011 (14)0.0094 (15)
Cl20.0183 (4)0.0255 (4)0.0242 (4)−0.0017 (3)−0.0041 (3)0.0038 (3)
N30.0209 (14)0.0267 (14)0.0152 (12)−0.0010 (11)0.0022 (11)0.0021 (11)
N50.0391 (19)0.052 (2)0.0206 (14)−0.0066 (17)0.0140 (14)−0.0034 (15)
N80.0144 (11)0.0118 (10)0.0123 (10)0.0009 (9)−0.0010 (9)−0.0004 (9)
Ni10.0151 (3)0.0177 (3)0.0123 (3)0.00026 (19)−0.00016 (19)0.00066 (19)
C4—N31.312 (5)N3—Ni12.063 (3)
C4—N51.345 (5)N5—H50.8600
C4—H40.9300N8—Ni12.095 (2)
C6—C71.353 (6)N8—H8A0.8900
C6—N51.357 (6)N8—H8B0.8900
C6—H60.9300N8—H8C0.8900
C7—N31.374 (5)Ni1—N3i2.063 (3)
C7—H70.9300Ni1—N8i2.095 (2)
Cl2—Ni12.4527 (9)Ni1—Cl2i2.4527 (9)
N3—C4—N5110.5 (4)Ni1—N8—H8C109.5
N3—C4—H4124.7H8A—N8—H8C109.5
N5—C4—H4124.7H8B—N8—H8C109.5
C7—C6—N5105.7 (3)N3i—Ni1—N3180.0
C7—C6—H6127.1N3i—Ni1—N889.00 (11)
N5—C6—H6127.1N3—Ni1—N891.00 (11)
C6—C7—N3109.7 (4)N3i—Ni1—N8i91.00 (11)
C6—C7—H7125.2N3—Ni1—N8i89.00 (11)
N3—C7—H7125.2N8—Ni1—N8i180.0
C4—N3—C7105.9 (3)N3i—Ni1—Cl2i89.45 (8)
C4—N3—Ni1126.3 (3)N3—Ni1—Cl2i90.55 (8)
C7—N3—Ni1127.2 (2)N8—Ni1—Cl2i89.62 (7)
C4—N5—C6108.2 (3)N8i—Ni1—Cl2i90.38 (7)
C4—N5—H5125.9N3i—Ni1—Cl290.55 (8)
C6—N5—H5125.9N3—Ni1—Cl289.45 (8)
Ni1—N8—H8A109.5N8—Ni1—Cl290.38 (7)
Ni1—N8—H8B109.5N8i—Ni1—Cl289.62 (7)
H8A—N8—H8B109.5Cl2i—Ni1—Cl2180.0
N5—C6—C7—N3−0.1 (5)C4—N3—Ni1—N8143.9 (3)
N5—C4—N3—C7−0.9 (5)C7—N3—Ni1—N8−46.1 (3)
N5—C4—N3—Ni1170.8 (3)C4—N3—Ni1—N8i−36.1 (3)
C6—C7—N3—C40.6 (5)C7—N3—Ni1—N8i133.9 (3)
C6—C7—N3—Ni1−171.1 (3)C4—N3—Ni1—Cl2i54.3 (3)
N3—C4—N5—C60.9 (5)C7—N3—Ni1—Cl2i−135.7 (3)
C7—C6—N5—C4−0.5 (5)C4—N3—Ni1—Cl2−125.7 (3)
C4—N3—Ni1—N3i126 (8)C7—N3—Ni1—Cl244.3 (3)
C7—N3—Ni1—N3i−64 (8)
D—H···AD—HH···AD···AD—H···A
N5—H5···Cl2ii0.862.533.268 (3)144
N8—H8A···Cl2iii0.892.323.180 (3)162
N8—H8B···Cl2iv0.892.373.210 (3)157
C4—H4···Cg1v0.932.953.772 (5)148
Table 1

Hydrogen-bond geometry (Å, °)

Cg1 is the centroid of the N3/C4/N5/C6/C7 ring.

D—H⋯A D—HH⋯A DA D—H⋯A
N5—H5⋯Cl2i 0.862.533.268 (3)144
N8—H8A⋯Cl2ii 0.892.323.180 (3)162
N8—H8B⋯Cl2iii 0.892.373.210 (3)157
C4—H4⋯Cg1iv 0.932.953.772 (5)148

Symmetry codes: (i) ; (ii) ; (iii) ; (iv) .

  3 in total

1.  A short history of SHELX.

Authors:  George M Sheldrick
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr A       Date:  2007-12-21       Impact factor: 2.290

2.  Poly[[μ(2)-aqua-μ(3)-(4-carb-oxy-2-propyl-1H-imidazole-5-carboxyl-ato-κN,O:O:O)-sodium] hemihydrate].

Authors:  Zhong-Jing Huang; Jin-Niu Tang; Zhi-Rong Luo; Dai-Yin Wang; Huan Wei
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect E Struct Rep Online       Date:  2011-03-09

3.  Structure validation in chemical crystallography.

Authors:  Anthony L Spek
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2009-01-20
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.