| Literature DB >> 24044611 |
Anna Bachmayr-Heyda1, Stefanie Aust, Georg Heinze, Stephan Polterauer, Christoph Grimm, Elena Ioana Braicu, Jalid Sehouli, Sandrina Lambrechts, Ignace Vergote, Sven Mahner, Dietmar Pils, Eva Schuster, Theresia Thalhammer, Reinhard Horvat, Carsten Denkert, Robert Zeillinger, Dan Cacsire Castillo-Tong.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Epithelial ovarian cancer is one of the most lethal gynecologic malignancies. Clinicopathological factors do not permit precise prognosis and cannot provide guidance to specific treatments. In this study we assessed tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells in association with Ki67 proliferation index and evaluated their prognostic impact in EOC samples.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24044611 PMCID: PMC3848589 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-13-422
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Clinicopathological characteristics of the tumors
| | |
| Serous | 179 (88.2) |
| Non-serous1 | 24 (11.8) |
| | |
| II | 9 (4.4) |
| III | 160 (78.8) |
| IV | 34 (16.7) |
| | |
| 1 | 7 (3.4) |
| 2 | 45 (22.2) |
| 3 | 150 (73.9) |
| Unkown | 1 (0.5) |
| | |
| No | 141 (69.5) |
| Yes | 62 (30.5) |
| 203 (100.0) |
18 endometrioid, 9 mixed epithelial, 1 mucinous, 4 undifferentiated, 2 clear cell.
Figure 1Representative CD8 and Ki67 immunohistochemical staining in epithelial ovarian cancer. A and B: high and low CD8+ cell infiltration, respectively; C and D: high and low Ki67 proliferation index, respectively; optical magnification x200.
Figure 2Non-linear association of Ki67 proliferation index with overall survival. Association adjusted for age, FIGO, residual tumor and CD8+ cell infiltration; relative hazard compared to a reference level of Ki67 = 5%; X-axis indicates Ki67 proliferation index.
Results of cox regression analyses
| Age (continuous, per decade) | ||||
| FIGO (ordinal, per stage) | ||||
| Residual tumor (yes vs. no) | ||||
| CD8+ cell infiltration (continuous, per doubling) | ||||
| Ki67+ tumor cells (<5% vs. ≥5%) | ||||
| | ||||
| Age (continuous, per decade) | 1.08 (0.94-1.23) | 0.268 | ||
| FIGO (ordinal, per stage) | ||||
| Residual tumor (yes vs. no) | ||||
| CD8 cell infiltration (continuous, per doubling) | 0.97 (0.89-1.05) | 0.447 | 0.92 (0.84-1.01) | 0.074 |
| Ki67 (<5% vs. ≥5%) | 1.63 (0.76-3.49) | 0.209 | 1.51 (0.69-3.28) | 0.299 |
1HR and p values of statistically significant parameters presented in bold.
Figure 3Kaplan-Meier curves showing the association between CD8+ cell infiltration and overall survival of patients. CD8+ cell infiltration (low versus high, cut-off value at median); A: in optimally debulked patients; log-rank test, p = 0.596; B: in patients with residual tumor; log-rank test, p = 0.055.