Hanna Fagerlind1, Åsa Kettis, Bengt Glimelius, Lena Ring. 1. All authors: Uppsala University; Lena Ring, Medical Products Agency, Uppsala; Bengt Glimelius, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract
PURPOSE: To explore oncologists' psychosocial attitudes and beliefs and their perceptions regarding barriers against psychosocial communication. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to oncologists in Sweden (n = 537). Questions covered demography, the Physician Psychosocial Beliefs Scale (PPBS), and barriers against psychosocial communication. Stepwise multiple regression was used to determine what factors contribute the most to the PPBS score and the total number of barriers and barriers affecting clinical practice, respectively. Spearman rank-order correlation was used to determine correlation between PPBS score and number of barriers. RESULTS: Questionnaire response rate was 64%. Mean PPBS value was 85.5 (range, 49 to 123; SD, 13.0). Most oncologists (93%) perceived one or more barriers in communicating psychosocial aspects with patients. On average, five different communication barriers were perceived, of which most were perceived to affect clinical practice. These barriers included insufficient consultation time, lack of resources for taking care of problems discovered, and lack of methods to evaluate patients' psychosocial health in clinical practice. There was a positive correlation (rs = 0.490; P < .001) between the PPBS score and the number of perceived barriers (ie, less psychosocially oriented oncologists perceived more barriers). Oncologists with supplementary education with a psychosocial focus perceived fewer barriers/barriers affecting clinical practice (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively) and were more psychosocially oriented (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Oncologists perceive many different barriers affecting psychosocial communication in clinical practice. Interventions aiming to improve psychosocial communication must therefore be multifaceted and individualized to clinics and individual oncologists. It is important to minimize barriers to facilitate optimal care and treatment of patients with cancer.
PURPOSE: To explore oncologists' psychosocial attitudes and beliefs and their perceptions regarding barriers against psychosocial communication. METHODS: A questionnaire was distributed to oncologists in Sweden (n = 537). Questions covered demography, the Physician Psychosocial Beliefs Scale (PPBS), and barriers against psychosocial communication. Stepwise multiple regression was used to determine what factors contribute the most to the PPBS score and the total number of barriers and barriers affecting clinical practice, respectively. Spearman rank-order correlation was used to determine correlation between PPBS score and number of barriers. RESULTS: Questionnaire response rate was 64%. Mean PPBS value was 85.5 (range, 49 to 123; SD, 13.0). Most oncologists (93%) perceived one or more barriers in communicating psychosocial aspects with patients. On average, five different communication barriers were perceived, of which most were perceived to affect clinical practice. These barriers included insufficient consultation time, lack of resources for taking care of problems discovered, and lack of methods to evaluate patients' psychosocial health in clinical practice. There was a positive correlation (rs = 0.490; P < .001) between the PPBS score and the number of perceived barriers (ie, less psychosocially oriented oncologists perceived more barriers). Oncologists with supplementary education with a psychosocial focus perceived fewer barriers/barriers affecting clinical practice (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively) and were more psychosocially oriented (P = .001). CONCLUSION: Oncologists perceive many different barriers affecting psychosocial communication in clinical practice. Interventions aiming to improve psychosocial communication must therefore be multifaceted and individualized to clinics and individual oncologists. It is important to minimize barriers to facilitate optimal care and treatment of patients with cancer.
Authors: Suzanne C O'Neill; Kathryn L Taylor; Jonathan Clapp; Jinani Jayasekera; Claudine Isaacs; Deena Mary Atieh Graham; Stuart L Goldberg; Jeanne Mandelblatt Journal: J Health Commun Date: 2018-08-21
Authors: Nicole Ernstmann; Markus Wirtz; Anika Nitzsche; Sophie E Gross; Lena Ansmann; Tristan D Gloede; Julia Jung; Holger Pfaff; Walter Baumann; Stephan Schmitz; Melanie Neumann Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2017-09 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Joanne Lester; Kara Crosthwaite; Robin Stout; Rachel N Jones; Christopher Holloman; Charles Shapiro; Barbara L Andersen Journal: Oncol Nurs Forum Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 2.172
Authors: Kara Long Roche; Ana M Angarita; Angelica Cristello; Melissa Lippitt; Adil H Haider; Janice V Bowie; Amanda N Fader; Ana I Tergas Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2016-10-31 Impact factor: 3.840