| Literature DB >> 24039888 |
Brian D Lutz1, Emily S Bernhardt, William H Schlesinger.
Abstract
While several thousand square kilometers of land area have been subject to surface mining in the Central Appalachians, no reliable estimate exists for how much coal is produced per unit landscape disturbance. We provide this estimate using regional satellite-derived mine delineations and historical county-level coal production data for the period 1985-2005, and further relate the aerial extent of mining disturbance to stream impairment and loss of ecosystem carbon sequestration potential. To meet current US coal demands, an area the size of Washington DC would need to be mined every 81 days. A one-year supply of coal would result in ∼2,300 km of stream impairment and a loss of ecosystem carbon sequestration capacity comparable to the global warming potential of >33,000 US homes. For the first time, the environmental impacts of surface coal mining can be directly scaled with coal production rates.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24039888 PMCID: PMC3770658 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0073203
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Stream impairment estimates per unit coal produced.
| Metric | Mining threshold (%) | Cumulative impairment through 2005 (km) | Impairment from 1985 and prior (km) | Impairment for period 1985–2005 (km) | Stream impairment per unit disturbance (m ha−1) | Stream impairment per unit coal (cm ton−1) |
|
| 5.4 | 2,834 | 940 | 1,894 | 29.0 | 0.25 |
|
| 6.3 | 3,390 | 1,422 | 1,968 | 30.2 | 0.26 |
|
| 2.2 | 4,308 | 2,545 | 1,763 | 27.0 | 0.24 |
Values correspond to upper 95% CI values reported by Bernhardt et al. (see Table 1 their publication) [10].
Values from Bernhardt et al. [10] for cumulative stream impairment over the period 1976–2005.
Data provided in Fig. 4 of ref.[10], as well as by the authors.
Quotient of stream impairment (1985–2005) divided by mining disturbance (1985–2005 WV only = 65,211ha; from Table S1 in File S1).
Converted to stream impairment per unit coal using slope estimate (11,500 tons coal/ha).
Foregone ecosystem C sequestration per unit coal produced.
| Study | Ecosystem Type | Soil C Sequestration Rate(g C m−2 yr−1) | Biomass C Sequestration Rate(g C m−2 yr−1) | Ecosystem C Sequestration Rate(g C m−2 yr−1) |
|
| Reclaimed Grassland | 159 | 8 | 167 |
|
| Reclaimed Forests | 274 | 83 | 357 |
|
| Unmined Forests | 237 | 152 | 389 |
Values are from Simmons et al. Table 5 [8]. Our reference to “Soil” is considered “total belowground” by the authors; our use of “biomass” is considered “total aboveground, as reported by the authors. Reported values for C pools were divided by stand age (15 yr) and converted to g C m−2 yr−1.
Values are calculated from Amichev et al. Table 1 [9]. Reported values for C pools for all sites were divided by stand age and converted to gC m−2 yr−1. Our reference to “Soil” is considered “SOC” + “Litter Layer C”, as reported by the authors; our reference to “Biomass” is considered “Total Tree C”, as reported by the authors.
Figure 1Extent of mining disturbance and relationship to coal production.
Red areas show the cumulative extent of surface mining disturbance between 1985–2005 across the study area (left). The amount of disturbance estimated within each county was regressed against cumulative county-level coal production reported for this period (right). Although Pike County, KY had more than twice the mining disturbance compared to any other county, confidence intervals around the slope estimates with the Pike County data included (95% CI = 8,320–11,300) overlapped with the confidence interval estimates for the slope value when this data point was omitted (95% CI = 9,650–13,340; confidence interval estimates calculated using the confint function in CRAN-R statistical software). Nonetheless, given this single data point exerts high leverage on the regression results, we use the values for the analysis in which this data point is excluded.
Figure 2Scaling the environmental costs of coal production.
Cumulative surface coal production across the 47 county study area is shown for the period 1985–2005 (A). Cumulative surface mining disturbance (B), stream length impairment (C), and forgone C sequestration (D) were estimated by multiplying the respective per-unit-coal values by the cumulative coal production data. Vertical dashed lines indicate comparative values for contextualization (see Table S2 in File S1).