Literature DB >> 18372559

Forest to reclaimed mine land use change leads to altered ecosystem structure and function.

Jeffrey A Simmons1, William S Currie, Keith N Eshleman, Karen Kuers, Susan Monteleone, Tim L Negley, Bob R Pohlad, Carolyn L Thomas.   

Abstract

The United States' use of coal results in many environmental alterations. In the Appalachian coal belt region, one widespread alteration is conversion of forest to reclaimed mineland. The goal of this study was to quantify the changes to ecosystem structure and function associated with a conversion from forest to reclaimed mine grassland by comparing a small watershed containing a 15-year-old reclaimed mine with a forested, reference watershed in western Maryland. Major differences were apparent between the two watersheds in terms of biogeochemistry. Total C, N, and P pools were all substantially lower at the mined site, mainly due to the removal of woody biomass but also, in the case of P, to reductions in soil pools. Mineral soil C, N, and P pools were 96%, 79%, and 69% of native soils, respectively. Although annual runoff from the watersheds was similar, the mined watershed exhibited taller, narrower storm peaks as a result of a higher soil bulk density and decreased infiltration rates. Stream export of N was much lower in the mined watershed due to lower net nitrification rates and nitrate concentrations in soil. However, stream export of sediment and P and summer stream temperature were much higher. Stream leaf decomposition was reduced and macroinvertebrate community structure was altered as a result of these changes to the stream environment. This land use change leads to substantial, long-term changes in ecosystem capital and function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18372559     DOI: 10.1890/07-1117.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Appl        ISSN: 1051-0761            Impact factor:   4.657


  12 in total

1.  Reconstructing disturbance history for an intensively mined region by time-series analysis of Landsat imagery.

Authors:  Jing Li; Carl E Zipper; Patricia F Donovan; Randolph H Wynne; Adam J Oliphant
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2015-08-07       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Investigation of biogeochemical functional proxies in headwater streams across a range of channel and catchment alterations.

Authors:  Jacob F Berkowitz; Elizabeth A Summers; Chris V Noble; John R White; Ronald D DeLaune
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Restoring forests and associated ecosystem services on appalachian coal surface mines.

Authors:  Carl E Zipper; James A Burger; Jeffrey G Skousen; Patrick N Angel; Christopher D Barton; Victor Davis; Jennifer A Franklin
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 3.266

Review 4.  Systematic review of community health impacts of mountaintop removal mining.

Authors:  Abee L Boyles; Robyn B Blain; Johanna R Rochester; Raghavendhran Avanasi; Susan B Goldhaber; Sofie McComb; Stephanie D Holmgren; Scott A Masten; Kristina A Thayer
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 9.621

5.  Development of soils and communities of plants and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi on West Virginia surface mines.

Authors:  Michael A Levy; Jonathan R Cumming
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2014-09-07       Impact factor: 3.266

6.  Mountaintop removal mining: digging into community health concerns.

Authors:  David C Holzman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 7.  Assessing "dangerous climate change": required reduction of carbon emissions to protect young people, future generations and nature.

Authors:  James Hansen; Pushker Kharecha; Makiko Sato; Valerie Masson-Delmotte; Frank Ackerman; David J Beerling; Paul J Hearty; Ove Hoegh-Guldberg; Shi-Ling Hsu; Camille Parmesan; Johan Rockstrom; Eelco J Rohling; Jeffrey Sachs; Pete Smith; Konrad Steffen; Lise Van Susteren; Karina von Schuckmann; James C Zachos
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-03       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Understanding the Capability of an Ecosystem Nature-Restoration in Coal Mined Area.

Authors:  Xiaoqin Cui; Suping Peng; Laurence R Lines; Guowei Zhu; Zhenqi Hu; Fan Cui
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  The environmental price tag on a ton of mountaintop removal coal.

Authors:  Brian D Lutz; Emily S Bernhardt; William H Schlesinger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Mine land reclamation and eco-reconstruction in Shanxi province I: mine land reclamation model.

Authors:  Hao Bing-yuan; Kang Li-xun
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-06-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.