AIM: To prospectively compare the healing rates of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced ulcers treated with either a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) or rebamipide. METHODS: We examined 90 patients with early gastric cancer who had undergone ESD. All patients were administered an intravenous infusion of the PPI lansoprazole (20 mg) every 12 h for 2 d, followed by oral administration of lansoprazole (30 mg/d, 5 d). After 7-d treatment, the patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups and received either lansoprazole (30 mg/d orally, n = 45; PPI group) or rebamipide (300 mg orally, three times a day; n = 45; rebamipide group). At 4 and 8 wk after ESD, the ulcer outcomes in the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted in patient age, underlying disease, tumor location, Helicobacter pylori infection rate, or ESD-induced ulcer size between the 2 groups. At both 4 and 8 wk, the healing rates of ESD-induced ulcers were similar in the PPI-treated and the rebamipide-treated patients (4 wk: PPI, 27.2%; rebamipide, 33.3%; P = 0.5341; 8 wk: PPI, 90.9%; rebamipide, 93.3%; P = 0.6710). At 8 wk, the rates of granulation lesions following ulcer healing were significantly higher in the PPI-treated group (13.6%) than in the rebamipide-treated group (0.0%; P = 0.0103). Ulcer-related symptoms were similar in the 2 treatment groups at 8 wk. The medication cost of 8-wk treatment with the PPI was 10945 yen vs 4889 yen for rebamipide. No ulcer bleeding or complications due to the drugs were observed in either treatment group. CONCLUSION: The healing rate of ESD-induced ulcers was similar with rebamipide or PPI treatment; however, rebamipide treatment is more cost-effective and prevents granulation lesions following ulcer healing.
RCT Entities:
AIM: To prospectively compare the healing rates of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced ulcers treated with either a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) or rebamipide. METHODS: We examined 90 patients with early gastric cancer who had undergone ESD. All patients were administered an intravenous infusion of the PPI lansoprazole (20 mg) every 12 h for 2 d, followed by oral administration of lansoprazole (30 mg/d, 5 d). After 7-d treatment, the patients were randomly assigned to 2 groups and received either lansoprazole (30 mg/d orally, n = 45; PPI group) or rebamipide (300 mg orally, three times a day; n = 45; rebamipide group). At 4 and 8 wk after ESD, the ulcer outcomes in the 2 groups were compared. RESULTS: No significant differences were noted in patient age, underlying disease, tumor location, Helicobacter pylori infection rate, or ESD-induced ulcer size between the 2 groups. At both 4 and 8 wk, the healing rates of ESD-induced ulcers were similar in the PPI-treated and the rebamipide-treated patients (4 wk: PPI, 27.2%; rebamipide, 33.3%; P = 0.5341; 8 wk: PPI, 90.9%; rebamipide, 93.3%; P = 0.6710). At 8 wk, the rates of granulation lesions following ulcer healing were significantly higher in the PPI-treated group (13.6%) than in the rebamipide-treated group (0.0%; P = 0.0103). Ulcer-related symptoms were similar in the 2 treatment groups at 8 wk. The medication cost of 8-wk treatment with the PPI was 10945 yen vs 4889 yen for rebamipide. No ulcer bleeding or complications due to the drugs were observed in either treatment group. CONCLUSION: The healing rate of ESD-induced ulcers was similar with rebamipide or PPI treatment; however, rebamipide treatment is more cost-effective and prevents granulation lesions following ulcer healing.
Authors: Woon Geon Shin; Sung Jung Kim; Min Ho Choi; Kyoung Oh Kim; Hyun Joo Jang; Cheol Hee Park; Il Hyun Baek; Kyung Ho Kim; Gwang Ho Baik; Sea Hyub Kae; Jong Hyeok Kim; Hak Yang Kim Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 9.427