BACKGROUND: There has been no consensus regarding the optimal treatment durations and drug regimens in patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced ulcers. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and rebamipide combination therapy compared with PPI monotherapy for ESD-induced ulcer healing. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, controlled study; clinical trial. SETTING:Five hospitals in a University Medical Center group in Korea. PATIENTS: This study involved 290 adults (309 lesions) who underwent ESD for gastric adenoma or early gastric cancer. INTERVENTION: PPI and rebamipide combination therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The ulcer healing rate at 4 weeks after ESD. RESULTS: The ulcer healing rates at 4 weeks after ESD in the PPI and rebamipide combination therapy group were significantly higher than those in the PPI alone group, both in the full analysis (94.9% vs 89.9%; P < .0001) and in the per-protocol analysis (94.5% vs 91.2%; P = .020). This combination therapy was an independent predictive factor for a high ulcer healing rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 5.572; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.615-11.876; P = .014). Additionally, the combination therapy group exhibited a higher quality of ulcer healing than the PPI monotherapy group (reviewer 1: P = .027; OR 1.949; 95% CI, 1.077-3.527; reviewer 2: P = .027; OR 1.933; 95% CI, 1.074-3.481). LIMITATIONS: Open-label study. CONCLUSION:PPI and rebamipide combination therapy had a superior 4-week ESD-induced ulcer healing rate and quality of ulcer healing compared with PPI monotherapy. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01167101.). Copyright Â
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: There has been no consensus regarding the optimal treatment durations and drug regimens in patients with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced ulcers. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy of proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and rebamipide combination therapy compared with PPI monotherapy for ESD-induced ulcer healing. DESIGN: Randomized, prospective, controlled study; clinical trial. SETTING: Five hospitals in a University Medical Center group in Korea. PATIENTS: This study involved 290 adults (309 lesions) who underwent ESD for gastric adenoma or early gastric cancer. INTERVENTION: PPI and rebamipide combination therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The ulcer healing rate at 4 weeks after ESD. RESULTS: The ulcer healing rates at 4 weeks after ESD in the PPI and rebamipide combination therapy group were significantly higher than those in the PPI alone group, both in the full analysis (94.9% vs 89.9%; P < .0001) and in the per-protocol analysis (94.5% vs 91.2%; P = .020). This combination therapy was an independent predictive factor for a high ulcer healing rate (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 5.572; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.615-11.876; P = .014). Additionally, the combination therapy group exhibited a higher quality of ulcer healing than the PPI monotherapy group (reviewer 1: P = .027; OR 1.949; 95% CI, 1.077-3.527; reviewer 2: P = .027; OR 1.933; 95% CI, 1.074-3.481). LIMITATIONS: Open-label study. CONCLUSION: PPI and rebamipide combination therapy had a superior 4-week ESD-induced ulcer healing rate and quality of ulcer healing compared with PPI monotherapy. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01167101.). Copyright Â
Authors: Chang Seok Bang; Woon Geon Shin; Seung In Seo; Min Ho Choi; Hyun Joo Jang; Se Woo Park; Sea Hyub Kae; Young Joo Yang; Suk Pyo Shin; Gwang Ho Baik; Hak Yang Kim Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2018-08-30 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Chan Hyuk Park; Dong-Hoon Yang; Jong Wook Kim; Jie-Hyun Kim; Ji Hyun Kim; Yang Won Min; Si Hyung Lee; Jung Ho Bae; Hyunsoo Chung; Kee Don Choi; Jun Chul Park; Hyuk Lee; Min-Seob Kwak; Bun Kim; Hyun Jung Lee; Hye Seung Lee; Miyoung Choi; Dong-Ah Park; Jong Yeul Lee; Jeong-Sik Byeon; Chan Guk Park; Joo Young Cho; Soo Teik Lee; Hoon Jai Chun Journal: Intest Res Date: 2020-10-13