BACKGROUND: Newer troponin assays provide high sensitivity and precision and are reported in a stratified manner by some laboratories. We sought to investigate the clinical impact of such reporting in the treatment of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: We identified patients presenting with suspected ACS over a one-year period. Patients were stratified based on their peak troponin I values within 24 hours of admission into the following categories as reported by our laboratory: troponin value ≤0.03 ng/ml, which is reported as normal (negative troponin group), troponin value 0.04-0.29 ng/ml, which is reported as suggestive of myocardial damage (intermediate troponin group), and troponin value ≥0.3 ng/ml which is reported as indicative of myocardial necrosis (high troponin group). RESULTS: Plasma troponin concentrations were ≤0.03 ng/ml in 77 patients (68.7%), 0.04-0.29 ng/ml in 18 patients (16.1%), and ≥0.30 ng/ml in 17 patients (15.2%). Patients in the intermediate troponin group had thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk scores that were similar to that of the high troponin group. Despite this, patients in the intermediate troponin group were almost 50% less likely to receive coronary angiography, anticoagulation, and clopidogrel when compared to the high troponin group. CONCLUSION: Patients in the intermediate troponin group that meet the guideline definition of acute myocardial infarction are less likely to receive optimal medical and invasive therapy as compared to the high troponin group even though TIMI risk scores were similar in the two groups.
BACKGROUND: Newer troponin assays provide high sensitivity and precision and are reported in a stratified manner by some laboratories. We sought to investigate the clinical impact of such reporting in the treatment of patients with suspected acute coronary syndrome (ACS). METHODS: We identified patients presenting with suspected ACS over a one-year period. Patients were stratified based on their peak troponin I values within 24 hours of admission into the following categories as reported by our laboratory: troponin value ≤0.03 ng/ml, which is reported as normal (negative troponin group), troponin value 0.04-0.29 ng/ml, which is reported as suggestive of myocardial damage (intermediate troponin group), and troponin value ≥0.3 ng/ml which is reported as indicative of myocardial necrosis (high troponin group). RESULTS: Plasma troponin concentrations were ≤0.03 ng/ml in 77 patients (68.7%), 0.04-0.29 ng/ml in 18 patients (16.1%), and ≥0.30 ng/ml in 17 patients (15.2%). Patients in the intermediate troponin group had thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk scores that were similar to that of the high troponin group. Despite this, patients in the intermediate troponin group were almost 50% less likely to receive coronary angiography, anticoagulation, and clopidogrel when compared to the high troponin group. CONCLUSION:Patients in the intermediate troponin group that meet the guideline definition of acute myocardial infarction are less likely to receive optimal medical and invasive therapy as compared to the high troponin group even though TIMI risk scores were similar in the two groups.
Authors: E M Antman; M Cohen; P J Bernink; C H McCabe; T Horacek; G Papuchis; B Mautner; R Corbalan; D Radley; E Braunwald Journal: JAMA Date: 2000-08-16 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Kristian Thygesen; Joseph S Alpert; Harvey D White; Allan S Jaffe; Fred S Apple; Marcello Galvani; Hugo A Katus; L Kristin Newby; Jan Ravkilde; Bernard Chaitman; Peter M Clemmensen; Mikael Dellborg; Hanoch Hod; Pekka Porela; Richard Underwood; Jeroen J Bax; George A Beller; Robert Bonow; Ernst E Van der Wall; Jean-Pierre Bassand; William Wijns; T Bruce Ferguson; Philippe G Steg; Barry F Uretsky; David O Williams; Paul W Armstrong; Elliott M Antman; Keith A Fox; Christian W Hamm; E Magnus Ohman; Maarten L Simoons; Philip A Poole-Wilson; Enrique P Gurfinkel; José-Luis Lopez-Sendon; Prem Pais; Shanti Mendis; Jun-Ren Zhu; Lars C Wallentin; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Kim M Fox; Alexander N Parkhomenko; Silvia G Priori; Michal Tendera; Liisa-Maria Voipio-Pulkki; Alec Vahanian; A John Camm; Raffaele De Caterina; Veronica Dean; Kenneth Dickstein; Gerasimos Filippatos; Christian Funck-Brentano; Irene Hellemans; Steen Dalby Kristensen; Keith McGregor; Udo Sechtem; Sigmund Silber; Michal Tendera; Petr Widimsky; José Luis Zamorano; Joao Morais; Sorin Brener; Robert Harrington; David Morrow; Michael Lim; Marco A Martinez-Rios; Steve Steinhubl; Glen N Levine; W Brian Gibler; David Goff; Marco Tubaro; Darek Dudek; Nawwar Al-Attar Journal: Circulation Date: 2007-10-19 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Nicholas L Mills; Antonia M D Churchhouse; Kuan Ken Lee; Atul Anand; David Gamble; Anoop S V Shah; Elspeth Paterson; Margaret MacLeod; Catriona Graham; Simon Walker; Martin A Denvir; Keith A A Fox; David E Newby Journal: JAMA Date: 2011-03-23 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Adam M Rogers; Vijay S Ramanath; Mary Grzybowski; Arthur L Riba; Sandeep M Jani; Rajendra Mehta; Anthony C De Franco; Robert Parrish; Stephen Skorcz; Patricia L Baker; Jessica Faul; Benrong Chen; Canopy Roychoudhury; Mary Anne C Elma; Kristi R Mitchell; James B Froehlich; Cecelia Montoye; Kim A Eagle Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: Till Keller; Tanja Zeller; Dirk Peetz; Stergios Tzikas; Alexander Roth; Ewa Czyz; Christoph Bickel; Stephan Baldus; Ascan Warnholtz; Meike Fröhlich; Christoph R Sinning; Medea S Eleftheriadis; Philipp S Wild; Renate B Schnabel; Edith Lubos; Nicole Jachmann; Sabine Genth-Zotz; Felix Post; Viviane Nicaud; Laurence Tiret; Karl J Lackner; Thomas F Münzel; Stefan Blankenberg Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2009-08-27 Impact factor: 91.245