Literature DB >> 2403818

Etoposide in acute nonlymphocytic leukemia. Australian Leukemia Study Group.

J F Bishop1, R M Lowenthal, D Joshua, J P Matthews, D Todd, R Cobcroft, M G Whiteside, H Kronenberg, D Ma, A Dodds.   

Abstract

Previously untreated patients with acute nonlymphocytic leukemia (ANLL) aged 15 to 70 years were randomized to either cytosine arabinoside 100 mg/m2/d continuous intravenous (IV) infusion days 1 through 7, daunorubicin 50 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 3 (7-3), or the same drugs intensified with etoposide 75 mg/m2/d IV days 1 through 7 (7-3-7) as induction therapy. Patients achieving complete remission (CR) received two courses of consolidation therapy (5-2 or 5-2-5) followed by maintenance therapy. Of 264 eligible patients, CR occurred in 56% of 7-3 and 59% of 7-3-7 patients; 7-3-7 significantly improved remission duration (P = .01). The median remission duration was 12 months for 7-3 and 18 months for 7-3-7. Survival was similar when the two arms were compared overall. Subset analysis performed to identify patients with the most benefit showed that etoposide significantly prolonged remission duration in younger patients (less than 55 years) with a median of 12 months for 7-3 and 27 months for 7-3-7 (P = .01). Survival appeared to be prolonged with 7-3-7 in patients aged less than 55 years, with a median of 9 months for 7-3 as compared with 17 months for 7-3-7 (P = .03). In older patients (aged greater than or equal to 55 years), 7-3-7 was more toxic, with significantly more severe [World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 or 4] stomatitis (P = .02) and no additional clinical benefit. Hematologic toxicity for induction courses was similar, with granulocytopenia less than 0.5 x 10(9)/L for a median of 16 days per course for 7-3 and 15 days for 7-3-7. Hematologic toxicity was more severe for 5-2-5 consolidation courses (P = .003). Induction and consolidation therapy intensified with etoposide resulted in significantly improved remission duration but not survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2403818

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Blood        ISSN: 0006-4971            Impact factor:   22.113


  35 in total

1.  Rapid upregulation of telomerase activity in human leukemia HL-60 cells treated with clinical doses of the DNA-damaging drug etoposide.

Authors:  T J Moriarty; S Dupuis; C Autexier
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 11.528

2.  Prognostic factors for intensive care unit admission, intensive care outcome, and post-intensive care survival in patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia: a single center experience.

Authors:  Peter Schellongowski; Thomas Staudinger; Michael Kundi; Klaus Laczika; Gottfried J Locker; Andja Bojic; Oliver Robak; Valentin Fuhrmann; Ulrich Jäger; Peter Valent; Wolfgang R Sperr
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 9.941

3.  The FLAM regimen: revisiting time sequential induction therapy for patients with poor-risk acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Steven Knapper
Journal:  Haematologica       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 9.941

Review 4.  Therapeutic advances in leukemia and myelodysplastic syndrome over the past 40 years.

Authors:  Hagop Kantarjian; Susan O'Brien; Jorge Cortes; William Wierda; Stefan Faderl; Guillermo Garcia-Manero; Jean-Pierre Issa; Elihu Estey; Michael Keating; Emil J Freireich
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 5.  Upfront therapy of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Jenna Vanliere Canzoniero; Bhavana Bhatnagar; Maria R Baer; Ivana Gojo
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 6.  Timed sequential therapy for acute myelogenous leukemia: Results of a retrospective study of 301 patients and review of the literature.

Authors:  Kelly J Norsworthy; Amy E DeZern; Hua-Ling Tsai; Wesley A Hand; Ravi Varadhan; Steven D Gore; Ivana Gojo; Keith Pratz; Hetty E Carraway; Margaret Showel; Michael A McDevitt; Douglas Gladstone; Gabriel Ghiaur; Gabrielle Prince; Amy H Seung; Dina Benani; Mark J Levis; Judith E Karp; B Douglas Smith
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.156

7.  Optimum Induction Chemotherapy for Pediatric Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Experience From A Developing Country.

Authors:  Tariq Ghafoor; Shakeel Ahmed; Sumaira Khalil; Tanzeela Farah
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020

8.  Clinical Impact of Additional Cytogenetic Aberrations, cKIT and RAS Mutations, and Treatment Elements in Pediatric t(8;21)-AML: Results From an International Retrospective Study by the International Berlin-Frankfurt-Münster Study Group.

Authors:  Kim Klein; Gertjan Kaspers; Christine J Harrison; H Berna Beverloo; Ardine Reedijk; Mathilda Bongers; Jacqueline Cloos; Andrea Pession; Dirk Reinhardt; Martin Zimmerman; Ursula Creutzig; Michael Dworzak; Todd Alonzo; Donna Johnston; Betsy Hirsch; Michal Zapotocky; Barbara De Moerloose; Alcira Fynn; Vincent Lee; Takashi Taga; Akio Tawa; Anne Auvrignon; Bernward Zeller; Erik Forestier; Carmen Salgado; Walentyna Balwierz; Alexander Popa; Jeffrey Rubnitz; Susana Raimondi; Brenda Gibson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Recent advances in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Omar Abdel-Wahab; Ross L Levine
Journal:  F1000 Med Rep       Date:  2010-07-22

10.  Tipifarnib in the treatment of newly diagnosed acute myelogenous leukemia.

Authors:  Judith E Karp; Jeffrey E Lancet
Journal:  Biologics       Date:  2008-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.