Literature DB >> 24037300

Do urban canyons influence street level grass pollen concentrations?

Robert George Peel1, Roy Kennedy, Matt Smith, Ole Hertel.   

Abstract

In epidemiological studies, outdoor exposure to pollen is typically estimated using rooftop monitoring station data, whilst exposure overwhelmingly occurs at street level. In this study the relationship between street level and roof level grass pollen concentrations was investigated for city centre street canyon environments in Aarhus, Denmark, and London, UK, during the grass pollen seasons of 2010 and 2011 respectively. For the period mid-day to late evening, street level concentrations in both cities tended to be lower than roof-level concentrations, though this difference was found to be statistically significant only in London. The ratio of street/roof level concentrations was compared with temperature, relative humidity, wind speed and direction, and solar radiation. Results indicated that the concentration ratio responds to wind direction with respect to relative canyon orientation and local source distribution. In the London study, an increase in relative humidity was linked to a significant decrease in street/roof level concentration ratio, and a possible causative mechanism involving moisture mediated pollen grain buoyancy is proposed. Relationships with the other weather variables were not found to be significant in either location. These results suggest a tendency for monitoring station data to overestimate exposure in the canyon environment.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24037300     DOI: 10.1007/s00484-013-0728-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biometeorol        ISSN: 0020-7128            Impact factor:   3.787


  10 in total

1.  Effects of sampling height and climatic conditions in aerobiological studies.

Authors:  P Alcázar; C Galán; P Cariñanos; E Domínguez-Vilches
Journal:  J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol       Date:  1999 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.333

2.  Measured and modelled concentrations and vertical profiles of airborne particulate matter within the boundary layer of a street canyon.

Authors:  J J Colls; A Micallef
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  1999-09-01       Impact factor: 7.963

3.  Significance of sampling height of airborne particles for aerobiological information.

Authors:  A Rantio-Lehtimäki; A Koivikko; R Kupias; Y Mäkinen; A Pohjola
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 13.146

4.  Factors that determine the severity of Betula spp. pollen seasons in Poland (Poznań and Krakow) and the United Kingdom (Worcester and London).

Authors:  A Stach; J Emberlin; M Smith; B Adams-Groom; D Myszkowska
Journal:  Int J Biometeorol       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 3.787

5.  Collection and Washout of Airborne Pollens and Spores by Raindrops.

Authors:  J E McDonald
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-02-09       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Relative efficiencies of the Burkard 7-Day, Rotorod and Burkard Personal Samplers for Poaceae and Urticaceae pollen under field conditions.

Authors:  Robert G Peel; Roy Kennedy; Matt Smith; Ole Hertel
Journal:  Ann Agric Environ Med       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.447

7.  Variation in ragweed pollen concentration to a height of 108 meters.

Authors:  G S Raynor; E C Ogden; J V Hayes
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 10.793

8.  Association between air pollution and daily consultations with general practitioners for allergic rhinitis in London, United Kingdom.

Authors:  S Hajat; A Haines; R W Atkinson; S A Bremner; H R Anderson; J Emberlin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-04-01       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Rate of dehydration of corn (Zea mays L.) pollen in the air.

Authors:  Donald E Aylor
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2003-08-08       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  Air pollution and seasonal asthma during the pollen season. A cohort study in Puertollano and Ciudad Real (Spain).

Authors:  F Feo Brito; P Mur Gimeno; C Martínez; A Tobías; L Suárez; F Guerra; J M Borja; A M Alonso
Journal:  Allergy       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 13.146

  10 in total
  5 in total

1.  Urban-scale variation in pollen concentrations: A single station is insufficient to characterize daily exposure.

Authors:  Daniel S W Katz; Stuart A Batterman
Journal:  Aerobiologia (Bologna)       Date:  2020-04-20       Impact factor: 2.410

2.  The evaluation of pollen concentrations with statistical and computational methods on rooftop and on ground level in Vienna - How to include daily crowd-sourced symptom data.

Authors:  Maximilian Bastl; Katharina Bastl; Kostas Karatzas; Marija Aleksic; Reinhard Zetter; Uwe Berger
Journal:  World Allergy Organ J       Date:  2019-05-09       Impact factor: 4.084

3.  Incorporating the field border effect to reduce the predicted uncertainty of pollen dispersal model in Asia.

Authors:  Yuan-Chih Su; Cheng-Bin Lee; Tien-Joung Yiu; Bo-Jein Kuo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 4.379

4.  Urbanity as a determinant of exposure to grass pollen in Helsinki Metropolitan area, Finland.

Authors:  Timo T Hugg; Jan Hjort; Harri Antikainen; Jarmo Rusanen; Mirkka Tuokila; Sanna Korkonen; Jan Weckström; Maritta S Jaakkola; Jouni J K Jaakkola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  The effect of sampling height on grass pollen concentrations in different urban environments in the Helsinki Metropolitan Area, Finland.

Authors:  Timo T Hugg; Mirkka Tuokila; Sanna Korkonen; Jan Weckström; Maritta S Jaakkola; Jouni J K Jaakkola
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.