Literature DB >> 24037030

A qualitative study of healthcare providers' perspectives on the implications of genome-wide testing in pediatric clinical practice.

Marian Reiff1, Rebecca Mueller, Surabhi Mulchandani, Nancy B Spinner, Reed E Pyeritz, Barbara A Bernhardt.   

Abstract

The utilization of genome-wide chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in pediatric clinical practice provides an opportunity to consider how genetic diagnostics is evolving, and to prepare for the clinical integration of genome-wide sequencing technologies. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 15 healthcare providers (7 genetic counselors, 4 medical geneticists, and 4 non-genetics providers) to investigate the impact of CMA on clinical practice, and implications for providers, patients and families. Interviews were analyzed qualitatively using content analysis. Most providers reported that genomic testing enhanced their professional experience and was beneficial to patients, primarily due to the improved diagnostic rate compared with earlier chromosomal studies. Other effects on practice included moving towards genotype-first diagnosis and broadening indications for chromosomal testing. Opinions varied concerning informed consent and disclosure of results. The duty to disclose incidental findings (IFs) was noted; however concerns were raised about potential psychosocial harms of disclosing pre-symptomatic findings. Tensions were revealed between the need for comprehensive informed consent for all families and the challenges of communicating time-consuming and potentially anxiety-provoking information regarding uncertain and incidental findings that may be relevant only in rare cases. Genetic counselors can play an important role in liaising with families, health professionals and testing laboratories, providing education and guidance to non-genetics providers, and enabling families to receive adequate pre-and post-test information and follow-up care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24037030      PMCID: PMC3955216          DOI: 10.1007/s10897-013-9653-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  48 in total

1.  The coming explosion in genetic testing--is there a duty to recontact?

Authors:  Reed E Pyeritz
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-10-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Cytogenetic technology--genotype and phenotype.

Authors:  David H Ledbetter
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Disclosure of incidental findings from next-generation sequencing in pediatric genomic research.

Authors:  Ruqayyah Abdul-Karim; Benjamin E Berkman; David Wendler; Annette Rid; Javed Khan; Tom Badgett; Sara Chandros Hull
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 4.  Consensus statement: chromosomal microarray is a first-tier clinical diagnostic test for individuals with developmental disabilities or congenital anomalies.

Authors:  David T Miller; Margaret P Adam; Swaroop Aradhya; Leslie G Biesecker; Arthur R Brothman; Nigel P Carter; Deanna M Church; John A Crolla; Evan E Eichler; Charles J Epstein; W Andrew Faucett; Lars Feuk; Jan M Friedman; Ada Hamosh; Laird Jackson; Erin B Kaminsky; Klaas Kok; Ian D Krantz; Robert M Kuhn; Charles Lee; James M Ostell; Carla Rosenberg; Stephen W Scherer; Nancy B Spinner; Dimitri J Stavropoulos; James H Tepperberg; Erik C Thorland; Joris R Vermeesch; Darrel J Waggoner; Michael S Watson; Christa Lese Martin; David H Ledbetter
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Empowering primary care health professionals in medical genetics: how soon? How fast? How far?

Authors:  K Greendale; R E Pyeritz
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  2001

Review 6.  Medical applications of array CGH and the transformation of clinical cytogenetics.

Authors:  L G Shaffer; B A Bejjani
Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.636

7.  American College of Medical Genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants.

Authors:  Hutton M Kearney; Erik C Thorland; Kerry K Brown; Fabiola Quintero-Rivera; Sarah T South
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 8.822

8.  Reply to letter from Drs. Ledbetter, Saul, and Moeschler.

Authors:  Jannine Cody
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 8.822

9.  A blueprint for maternal and child health primary care physician education in medical genetics and genomic medicine: recommendations of the United States secretary for health and human services advisory committee on heritable disorders in newborns and children.

Authors:  Alex R Kemper; Tracy L Trotter; Michele A Lloyd-Puryear; Penny Kyler; W Gregory Feero; R Rodney Howell
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 8.822

10.  "What does it mean?": uncertainties in understanding results of chromosomal microarray testing.

Authors:  Marian Reiff; Barbara A Bernhardt; Surabhi Mulchandani; Danielle Soucier; Diana Cornell; Reed E Pyeritz; Nancy B Spinner
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 8.822

View more
  7 in total

1.  Communicating microarray results of uncertain clinical significance in consultation summary letters and implications for practice.

Authors:  Jean Lillian Paul; Rachel Pope-Couston; Samantha Wake; Trent Burgess; Tiong Yang Tan
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  A theory-informed systematic review of clinicians' genetic testing practices.

Authors:  Jean L Paul; Hanna Leslie; Alison H Trainer; Clara Gaff
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Public's Views toward Return of Secondary Results in Genomic Sequencing: It's (Almost) All about the Choice.

Authors:  Kerry A Ryan; Raymond G De Vries; Wendy R Uhlmann; J Scott Roberts; Michele C Gornick
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2017-03-29       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Genetic Testing Experiences Among Parents of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder in the United States.

Authors:  Shixi Zhao; Wei-Ju Chen; Shweta U Dhar; Tanya N Eble; Oi-Man Kwok; Lei-Shih Chen
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2019-12

5.  Advances in Genetic Discovery and Implications for Counseling of Patients and Families with Autism Spectrum Disorders.

Authors:  Jun Shen; Sharyn Lincoln; David T Miller
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2014-07-02

6.  Healthcare professionals' and patients' perspectives on consent to clinical genetic testing: moving towards a more relational approach.

Authors:  Gabrielle Natalie Samuel; Sandi Dheensa; Bobbie Farsides; Angela Fenwick; Anneke Lucassen
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2017-08-08       Impact factor: 2.652

Review 7.  Incidental Findings with Genomic Testing: Implications for Genetic Counseling Practice.

Authors:  Myra I Roche; Jonathan S Berg
Journal:  Curr Genet Med Rep       Date:  2015-08-25
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.