Marci E Gluck1, Cindy Ziker, Matthew Schwegler, Marie Thearle, Susanne B Votruba, Jonathan Krakoff. 1. Obesity and Diabetes Clinical Research Section, Phoenix Epidemiology and Clinical Research Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Phoenix, AZ, United States. Electronic address: gmarci@niddk.nih.gov.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for development of cognitive dysfunction. Impairments in glucose regulation have been associated with poorer performance on tests of executive function and information processing speed. METHODS: We administered the Stroop Color Word Task, where higher interference scores are indicative of decreased selective attention, to 98 non-diabetic volunteers (64 m; %fat=37 ± 12; age=36 ± 9 yrs, race=41 NA/30 C/13 H/14 AA) on our inpatient unit. After 3d on a weight maintaining diet, % body fat was measured by DXA and a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was administered. Impaired glucose regulation (IGR) was defined as: fasting plasma glucose ≥ 100 and ≤ 125 mg/dL and/or 2h plasma glucose between ≥ 140 and ≤ 199 mg/dL (IGR; n=48; NGR; n=50). Total and incremental area under the curve (AUC) for insulin and glucose were calculated. RESULTS: Stroop interference scores were not significantly associated with any measure of adiposity or insulin concentrations. Individuals with IGR had significantly higher interference scores than those with normal glucose regulation (NGR; p=0.003). Higher interference scores were significantly correlated with fasting plasma glucose concentrations (r=0.26, p=0.007) and total glucose AUC (r=0.30, p=0.02) and only trending so for iAUC and 2h plasma glucose (r=0.18, p=0.08; r=0.17, p=0.09 respectively). In separate multivariate linear models, fasting plasma glucose (p=0.002) and total glucose AUC (p=0.0005) remained significant predictors of Stroop interference scores, even after adjustment for age, sex, race, education and %fat. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with IGR had decreased performance on a test of selective attention. Fasting plasma glucose was more strongly associated with lower performance scores than 2h plasma glucose. Our results indicate that even mild hyperglycemia in the non-diabetic range is associated with attentional processing difficulties in a sample of younger adults. Whether these impairments precede or are induced by impaired glucose regulation is not clear.
BACKGROUND:Type 2 diabetes is a risk factor for development of cognitive dysfunction. Impairments in glucose regulation have been associated with poorer performance on tests of executive function and information processing speed. METHODS: We administered the Stroop Color Word Task, where higher interference scores are indicative of decreased selective attention, to 98 non-diabetic volunteers (64 m; %fat=37 ± 12; age=36 ± 9 yrs, race=41 NA/30 C/13 H/14 AA) on our inpatient unit. After 3d on a weight maintaining diet, % body fat was measured by DXA and a 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) was administered. Impaired glucose regulation (IGR) was defined as: fasting plasma glucose ≥ 100 and ≤ 125 mg/dL and/or 2h plasma glucose between ≥ 140 and ≤ 199 mg/dL (IGR; n=48; NGR; n=50). Total and incremental area under the curve (AUC) for insulin and glucose were calculated. RESULTS: Stroop interference scores were not significantly associated with any measure of adiposity or insulin concentrations. Individuals with IGR had significantly higher interference scores than those with normal glucose regulation (NGR; p=0.003). Higher interference scores were significantly correlated with fasting plasma glucose concentrations (r=0.26, p=0.007) and total glucose AUC (r=0.30, p=0.02) and only trending so for iAUC and 2h plasma glucose (r=0.18, p=0.08; r=0.17, p=0.09 respectively). In separate multivariate linear models, fasting plasma glucose (p=0.002) and total glucose AUC (p=0.0005) remained significant predictors of Stroop interference scores, even after adjustment for age, sex, race, education and %fat. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with IGR had decreased performance on a test of selective attention. Fasting plasma glucose was more strongly associated with lower performance scores than 2h plasma glucose. Our results indicate that even mild hyperglycemia in the non-diabetic range is associated with attentional processing difficulties in a sample of younger adults. Whether these impairments precede or are induced by impaired glucose regulation is not clear.
Authors: Miriam Promintzer-Schifferl; Gerhard Prager; Christian Anderwald; Martina Mandl; Harald Esterbauer; Soheila Shakeri-Leidenmühler; Giovanni Pacini; Marietta Stadler; Martin G Bischof; Bernhard Ludvik; Aanton Luger; Michael Krebs Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2011-04-14 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Yael D Reijmer; Esther van den Berg; Carla Ruis; L Jaap Kappelle; Geert Jan Biessels Journal: Diabetes Metab Res Rev Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 4.876
Authors: Sjoerd M Euser; Naveed Sattar; Jacqueline C M Witteman; Eduard L E M Bollen; Eric J G Sijbrands; Albert Hofman; Ivan J Perry; Monique M B Breteler; Rudi G J Westendorp Journal: Diabetes Date: 2010-04-14 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Hannah Bruehl; Oliver T Wolf; Victoria Sweat; Aziz Tirsi; Stephen Richardson; Antonio Convit Journal: Brain Res Date: 2009-05-20 Impact factor: 3.252
Authors: Suzanne Phelan; Jason Hassenstab; Jeanne M McCaffery; Lawrence Sweet; Hollie A Raynor; Ronald A Cohen; Rena R Wing Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2010-06-10 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Jussi Hirvonen; Kirsi A Virtanen; Lauri Nummenmaa; Jarna C Hannukainen; Miikka-Juhani Honka; Marco Bucci; Sergey V Nesterov; Riitta Parkkola; Juha Rinne; Patricia Iozzo; Pirjo Nuutila Journal: Diabetes Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 9.461
Authors: Douglas C Chang; Paolo Piaggi; Joushua E Burkholder; Susanne B Votruba; Jonathan Krakoff; Marci E Gluck Journal: Physiol Behav Date: 2016-10-13
Authors: Jeannine S Skinner; Amy Morgan; Hector Hernandez-Saucedo; Angela Hansen; Selena Corbett; Matthew Arbuckle; James Ba Leverenz; Consuelo H Wilkins; Suzanne Craft; Laura D Baker Journal: J Gerontol Geriatr Res Date: 2015-07-23
Authors: Rodrigo B Mansur; Francheska Delgado-Peraza; Mehala Subramaniapillai; Yena Lee; Michelle Iacobucci; Flora Nasri; Nelson Rodrigues; Joshua D Rosenblat; Elisa Brietzke; Victoria E Cosgrove; Nicole E Kramer; Trisha Suppes; Charles L Raison; Andrea Fagiolini; Natalie Rasgon; Sahil Chawla; Carlos Nogueras-Ortiz; Dimitrios Kapogiannis; Roger S McIntyre Journal: J Psychiatr Res Date: 2020-12-04 Impact factor: 4.791
Authors: A B Fagundo; S Jiménez-Murcia; C Giner-Bartolomé; Z Agüera; S Sauchelli; M Pardo; A B Crujeiras; R Granero; R Baños; C Botella; R de la Torre; J M Fernández-Real; J C Fernández-García; G Frühbeck; A Rodríguez; N Mallorquí-Bagué; S Tárrega; F J Tinahones; R Rodriguez; F Ortega; J M Menchón; F F Casanueva; F Fernández-Aranda Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-08-01 Impact factor: 4.379