Literature DB >> 20850061

Food-related Stroop interference in obese and normal-weight individuals: behavioral and electrophysiological indices.

Ilse M T Nijs1, Ingmar H A Franken, Peter Muris.   

Abstract

The primary objective of the present study was to investigate differences in the attentional processing of food-related words in a Stroop task, as assessed by means of behavioral (reaction times) and electrophysiological (P200 and P300 amplitudes) indices, between obese and normal-weight individuals. Results revealed a P200 bias to food-related words in obese participants, which was not seen in normal-weight participants. This indicates that, in an early, automatic stage of information processing, obese participants already tend to engage more attention towards food-related stimuli than to neutral stimuli. With respect to reaction times and P300 scores, as alleged indices of more conscious maintained attention, a general food-related bias was observed, with no between-group differences. Further, in the obese group, significant positive correlations were observed between the food-related reaction time bias, food craving, and external eating, whereas in the normal-weight group, food craving scores correlated positively with P200/P300 amplitude biases. It can be concluded that obese individuals display an enhanced automatic, preconscious attentional processing of food-related stimuli, and this can be regarded as an initial expression of a greater responsiveness to food cues. In the current food-abundant environment, such a heightened food cue-responsiveness might contribute substantially to the tendency to overeat.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20850061     DOI: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2010.07.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eat Behav        ISSN: 1471-0153


  38 in total

1.  Reduced Inhibitory Control Mediates the Relationship Between Cortical Thickness in the Right Superior Frontal Gyrus and Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Luca Lavagnino; Benson Mwangi; Isabelle E Bauer; Bo Cao; Sudhakar Selvaraj; Alan Prossin; Jair C Soares
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 7.853

2.  Executive functioning and dietary intake: Neurocognitive correlates of fruit, vegetable, and saturated fat intake in adults with obesity.

Authors:  Emily P Wyckoff; Brittney C Evans; Stephanie M Manasse; Meghan L Butryn; Evan M Forman
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.868

3.  Electrophysiological evidence for enhanced representation of food stimuli in working memory.

Authors:  Femke Rutters; Sanjay Kumar; Suzanne Higgs; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Human cognitive function and the obesogenic environment.

Authors:  Ashley A Martin; Terry L Davidson
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2014-03-11

Review 5.  A systematic review of attentional biases in disorders involving binge eating.

Authors:  Monika Stojek; Lisa M Shank; Anna Vannucci; Diana M Bongiorno; Eric E Nelson; Andrew J Waters; Scott G Engel; Kerri N Boutelle; Daniel S Pine; Jack A Yanovski; Marian Tanofsky-Kraff
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2018-01-31       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 6.  Neural vulnerability factors for obesity.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Kyle Burger
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2018-12-19

Review 7.  Managing temptation in obesity treatment: A neurobehavioral model of intervention strategies.

Authors:  Bradley M Appelhans; Simone A French; Sherry L Pagoto; Nancy E Sherwood
Journal:  Appetite       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.868

Review 8.  Behavioral and Neural Evidence of the Rewarding Value of Exercise Behaviors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Boris Cheval; Rémi Radel; Jason L Neva; Lara A Boyd; Stephan P Swinnen; David Sander; Matthieu P Boisgontier
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 9.  Appetitive traits as targets for weight loss: The role of food cue responsiveness and satiety responsiveness.

Authors:  Kerri N Boutelle; Michael A Manzano; Dawn M Eichen
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2020-06-18

Review 10.  Neural vulnerability factors that increase risk for future weight gain.

Authors:  Eric Stice; Sonja Yokum
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2016-02-08       Impact factor: 17.737

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.