Literature DB >> 24035734

Barriers to early pediatric cochlear implantation.

Michael Armstrong1, Alison Maresh, Claire Buxton, Patricia Craun, Lauren Wowroski, Brian Reilly, Diego Preciado.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Universal newborn hearing screening has significantly improved the ability to identify patients with congenital sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), which results in earlier treatment and better hearing and development outcomes. It is recommended that patients born with SNHL who meet criteria receive cochlear implants (CIs) by a target age of 12 months, however many children are being implanted at an older age. This study aims to describe populations of pre-lingual patients with SNHL that are at risk for delayed implantation and to identify and analyze barriers that cause this delay.
METHODS: Charts of patients receiving a CI between January 2008 and June 2012 at a tertiary care cochlear implant center were reviewed retrospectively. We looked at patient demographics, age at hearing loss diagnosis, age at implantation, and etiology of hearing loss. Barriers to implantation were identified through surveys completed by team members.
RESULTS: Fifty-seven CI recipients were identified of which 42 were in patients with pre-lingual SNHL. SNHL etiology included: cochlear dysplasia (18%), GJB2/GJB6 (17%), acquired (10%) extreme prematurity (9%), and idiopathic (46%). The median age of SNHL diagnosis for pre-lingual patients was 15 months. Compared to private insurance, public insurance status was associated with SNHL diagnosis at a significantly later median age (20.0 vs. 4.0 months, p=0.024), and with a significantly longer median interval from diagnosis to implantation (25.5 vs. 11.0 months, p=0.029). While cochlear implant team members identified delayed insurance approval and medical comorbidities as reasons for delayed implantation, the most significant factor identified was parental, with delayed/missed appointments or reluctance for evaluations or surgery.
CONCLUSION: 52% of patients with pre-lingual SNHL that met criteria for CI were implanted more than 12 months after diagnosis. Having public or no insurance was significantly associated with delayed implantation. Parental barriers were most common factors cited for delays in implantation. Overcoming these delays necessitates appropriate identification of at risk patients and creating a system to educate families and chaperone them through the process.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barriers to healthcare access; Cochlear implantation; Insurance status; Sensorineural hearing loss

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24035734     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2013.08.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0165-5876            Impact factor:   1.675


  10 in total

1.  Factors impacting early cochlear implantation in Chinese children.

Authors:  Wei Li; Chunfu Dai; Huawei Li; Bing Chen; Ye Jiang
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2015-01-08       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 2.  Disparities in access to pediatric hearing health care.

Authors:  Matthew L Bush; Michael R Kaufman; Beth N McNulty
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Identification of Potential Barriers to Timely Access to Pediatric Hearing Aids.

Authors:  Lisa Zhang; Anne R Links; Emily F Boss; Alicia White; Jonathan Walsh
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2020-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

4.  Rural barriers to early diagnosis and treatment of infant hearing loss in Appalachia.

Authors:  Matthew L Bush; Bryan Hardin; Christopher Rayle; Cathy Lester; Christina R Studts; Jennifer B Shinn
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 5.  Profound Hearing Loss: Addressing Barriers to Hearing Healthcare.

Authors:  Sheila R Pratt
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

6.  Identifying barriers and considerations for cochlear implantation in Amish children.

Authors:  Rachel Whelan; Jennifer L McCoy; Mahmoud Omar; David H Chi
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  2021-01-05       Impact factor: 1.808

7.  Pediatric Cochlear Implantation: Why Do Children Receive Implants Late?

Authors:  Elizabeth M Fitzpatrick; Julia Ham; JoAnne Whittingham
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2015 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.570

8.  Association of Socioeconomic Characteristics With Receipt of Pediatric Cochlear Implantations in California.

Authors:  Rance J T Fujiwara; Gail Ishiyama; Akira Ishiyama
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-01-04

9.  American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force Guidelines for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Children.

Authors:  Andrea D Warner-Czyz; J Thomas Roland; Denise Thomas; Kristin Uhler; Lindsay Zombek
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

10.  Improving early audiological intervention via newborn hearing screening in Belgium.

Authors:  Bénédicte Vos; Christelle Senterre; Michel Boutsen; Raphaël Lagasse; Alain Levêque
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 2.655

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.